Trickyblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2021
- Messages
- 2,156
- Team supported
- City
I’m gonna go with 12 or 18the question on everyone's mind - what number is he getting!
I’m gonna go with 12 or 18the question on everyone's mind - what number is he getting!
Good lad cracking news.Just checking my tin hat from last night, and I reckon it’s got another days beating left in it (nerds don’t hit that hard!)……
Kane’s camp has agreed to the new terms.
Now its over to the Execs to do their thing.
Well I for one felt our days of players and particularly management being typically, City of yesteryear were over.Or maybe it was just typical City. I’m not sure why people still believe that we are this well oiled machine. Our Execs have taken a lot of stick for messing up transfer in recent windows
Roman numerals?the question on everyone's mind - what number is he getting!
He also is the same age now than when Kun joined in 2011. Similar goals per game ratio too.gabby's and dzeko's stats in the league are strikingly similar, both scored 50 goals in around 7000 minutes and 130 appearances (7081 and 130 for dzeko, 7538 and 133 for jesus)
Kane doesn’t have much of a choice.Just checking my tin hat from last night, and I reckon it’s got another days beating left in it (nerds don’t hit that hard!)……
Kane’s camp has agreed to the new terms.
Now its over to the Execs to do their thing.
18 IMO he’s had that at Spuds before.I’m gonna go with 12 or 18
this. we are good but not faultless. not just the exec but the recruitment team themselves, we've had plenty of duds. we've had transfers that could and should have been handled far better. i still don't see the logic in loudly pursuing one striker option without preparing a plan B AND keeping it till late in the window. people argue that if they've done that, clearly there was a reason behind it, but that strikes me as circular logic. what if it's just a bad decision?Or maybe it was just typical City. I’m not sure why people still believe that we are this well oiled machine. Our Execs have taken a lot of stick for messing up transfer in recent windows
If only today they've agreed new terms with Kane then surely City would still be confident of a deal getting struck. We've had that other "ITK" guy saying the deal is straight up off and a general sense it isn't happening. So this agreeing with Kanes camp today would all be pointless.So he's saying kane wants to come, which he always has.
He's saying now we have to deal with spurs, which was always the issue ! How is any of that good news or any different to what we already know ?
Both under appreciated.gabby's and dzeko's stats in the league are strikingly similar, both scored 50 goals in around 7000 minutes and 130 appearances (7081 and 130 for dzeko, 7538 and 133 for jesus)
gabby's and dzeko's stats in the league are strikingly similar, both scored 50 goals in around 7000 minutes and 130 appearances (7081 and 130 for dzeko, 7538 and 133 for jesus)
Chelsea would have gone for him if he and any interest in going there. Same goes for United.Kane doesn’t have much of a choice.
The 2 main problems are his age and options.
He won’t go abroad so only leaves City or United as viable options.
Chelsea - lukaku
Arsenal - no chance
Liverpool- Jota, Salah, Firmino, mane
United- Rashford, Greenwood, cavani,martial
City- vacant position.
He has no choice.
hahah!I imagine there was no annoyance over the number ten shirt but more he wanted a bigger wedge to wear that fucking third kit
Kane doesn’t have much of a choice.
The 2 main problems are his age and options.
He won’t go abroad so only leaves City or United as viable options.
Chelsea - lukaku
Arsenal - no chance
Liverpool- Jota, Salah, Firmino, mane
United- Rashford, Greenwood, cavani,martial
City- vacant position.
He has no choice.
You couldn't get more different styles of a striker with these three.I saw today Gabby is equal to Dzeko in our Premier League goalscoring charts on 50 goals.
He is only eight goals behind Tevez.