That will a disaster if true. We need Bernardo if we don't sign a striker.Sadly looks like he is going regardless
Last edited:
That will a disaster if true. We need Bernardo if we don't sign a striker.Sadly looks like he is going regardless
as the famous septic pegg would say, Man City's new striker will be a man... or a woman, he, she, them,they, it, will live in a house, the number is.... on the doorVery difficult to sort fact from fiction in this transfer window
All the reliable City reporters have stated they will allow the players to leave as long as they bring in a suitable offer, and have also mentioned City want cash deals for any of the players from first team wanting out. The loan deals are already impossible unless we have a sudden transfer policy change and are offered way more than expected upon completion of loan. I would disregard any loan offer news. Whether player agrees personal terms with another club means nowt.Absolute worst possible case is Bernardo loaned out and no striker in.
Unless Haaland's camp have indicated City are his preferred destination as long as the deal is right, I can't see us entering a highest bidder wins auction for him next summer.
Next summer could end up like 5 blokes lining up, hoping that the hottie of their affections chooses them above the other contestants.
We've probably told his team what we're prepared to offer & left them a contact number to get back to us on if they're interested. Fuck him & move on......
Doesn't matter. We can't even guarantee on Kevin's fitness this season. We need Bernardo if we don't get a striker. He can play anywhere for usWe’ve brought in Grealish to replace Bernardo.
"It's a natural assumption"Yes, it's a natural assumption if he seems to prefer a short-term signing with an immediate impact, which the club are less keen on given that age profile and cost but are happy to entertain.
Strange obsession with 12/13 years olds you. Dangerous bloke.
We already have, it was reported that Alf sat down with Txiki. We put our deal forward and if it had been accepted. We wouldn't be after Kane.That may be true, but I'm sure if we threw our hat in the ring we'd fare well.
And to be honest, regarding Delap, I think people need to stop talking about him as a potential rival to Haaland in 4 years or so, it's mildly absurd at this point. That's an enormous what if.
Yeah? Kevin is not even fit. We don't know what problem he has and how long it will continue. Letting Bernardo go in this situation without a striker is a disasterGrealish signing lets Bernardo go. Kane is not relevant.
he wants outThat will a disaster of true. We need Bernardo if we don't sign a striker.
We already have, it was reported that Alf sat down with Txiki. We put our deal forward and if it had been accepted. We wouldn't be after Kane.
Why does he have to rival Haaland. How is that at all relevant?
Walker was 27 as well and that's worked out well."It's a natural assumption"
Didn't we sign Mahrez when he was 27? and then didn't Pep sign a new deal after that?
Also, how short-term do you think signing a 28 year old is? We signed Fernandinho at 28, he's going into his 9th season.
Messi or Ronaldo or Cavani would be short term. Not Kane.
Obsession? ummm... okay. I mention that I think you are 13 once and you are implying I'm a nonce? Nice one. And not the least bit childish...
he wants out
He can go when we get a striker. Surely club above all. He will be essential in our PL and CL campaign if we fail to land a strikerhe wants out
If Delap proves not good enough we will just dip into the market when we need to, chill out my man, you gotta start taking beta-blockers or something.First I've heard of this mate, when was this? What/who was the source?
In the hypothetical you're putting forward it's assuming Delap will be at a level high enough to take over the reigns from an ageing Kane, that's a big what if. Something a lot of blues are guilty of at the moment.
I totally understand he wants out, but our policy in regards to this is strange. Just said a mere £50m would do? Bernardo has 4 years left on his deal, as the selling party why are we making it look like a joke of a deal instead of standing our ground and pointing to his contract with a big fee, I can't think of another European club who would act this way and just be fine with whatever really, same goes for Laporte. £60m is a joke.he wants out
Not another "disaster" :(Bernie wants to go , we are never keeping an unhappy player , have you not noticed that , too busy whinging
First I've heard of this mate, when was this? What/who was the source?
In the hypothetical you're putting forward it's assuming Delap will be at a level high enough to take over the reigns from an ageing Kane, that's a big what if. Something a lot of blues are guilty of at the moment.
it is understood that the Norwegian international’s father, a former City player, has had contact with City’s director of football Txiki Begiristain.
Doesn't matter. We can't even guarantee on Kevin's fitness this season. We need Bernardo if we don't get a striker. He can play anywhere for us
Totally agree and it looks like a 2 year loan with purchaseI totally understand he wants out, but our policy in regards to this is strange. Just said a mere £50m would do? Bernardo has 4 years left on his deal, as the selling party why are we making it look like a joke of a deal instead of standing our ground and pointing to his contract with a big fee, I can't think of another European club who would act this way and just be fine with whatever really, same goes for Laporte. £60m is a joke.
he wants out