PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
He's a good player but not what we need.
He can take over as our king of social media, seeing as the current holder is indisposed.Maybe throw a cheeky bid in for Lingard whilst we’re at it..,
fuckinell.
I think that's just down to decision making, I'm sure Pep can help him understand better, release passes quicker, be more precise. When there's higher quality around it elevates levels for any player involved.He will have to vastly improve his passing to catch peps eye
I’ve been impressed with him . Seen it reported £26m so it’s a yes from me .,
I suppose that's only because we haven't really been linked with him, that would be 85 mill if we were.Where has the extremely low figure of £26m come from?
Where has the extremely low figure of £26m come from?
That's 26m until our name is mentioned then it's 75mI’ve been impressed with him . Seen it reported £26m so it’s a yes from me .,
But thats without the City tax, so assume around 60M-70M!!I’ve been impressed with him . Seen it reported £26m so it’s a yes from me .,
Look at the sources also, most likely bullshitHe's English, established in the England team, there's no way Leeds are letting him go that cheaply.
I think he would be great for City and so would Declan Rice.He's English, established in the England team, there's no way Leeds are letting him go that cheaply.
He's got 2 years left at the end of this season. You're right there's no chance at £26m but I reckon £60m odd would be his value.He's English, established in the England team, there's no way Leeds are letting him go that cheaply.
Wouldn't like either to be honest.I think he would be great for City and so would Declan Rice.
Cracking player who would thrive at city but your talking £60 million plus easy for him which is worth it .He's English, established in the England team, there's no way Leeds are letting him go that cheaply.