True_Blue69
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
Is it good or bad news?
The guy posting it has 400 followers, take it with a pinch of salt. One thing for sure if it was positive news he wouldn’t have been sharing it here.
Is it good or bad news?
I like this![]()
RAJASLOTO >> 6 Fitur Layanan Masyarakat Paling Membantu & Cara Login Digitalnya yang Praktis</
RAJASLOTO ,rajasloto login link alternatif, daftar rajasloto, heylink rajasloto, login rajasloto, 6 Fitur Layanan Masyarakat Paling Membantu & Cara Login Digitalnya yang Praktis</justgivemepositivenews.com

Sounds positive.
I think I can add some clarity.Please do not argue over my posts. I said earlier I was fine with what was being said as I had posted a lot tonight. But I also explained why I did so.
The numbers today were rather significant as they showed a major change linked to what we have been talking about here all day.They told us a lot about what was happening right now in the UK.
Hence I posted them here where everyone was today.
I also pointed out that I did so only as others were posting data in here too - such as the South Africa numbers and grphs over the last page in fact. Just taken from Twitter threads.
And noted that I saw that all being posted in here and felt that gave me leeway today And now I just wonder what actually constitutes data.
I have not bothered posting any more tonight as I am not going to become the centre of a fight over all this.
But I would like clarifying what is regarded as data that should not go in here only the other thread and what is data that is OK to post in here. I have not posted any of the charts I usedto do on the other thread in here. With GM cases and Pop Scores etc. Just crucial cases to try to show where Omicron is in the UK today. And a summary of the hospital changes over the past weekend as the government admitted that there were now Omicron cases going into hospital so the data here is pretty important at this point as we try to woerk out how eious the variant is to health.
If I make a graph out of it and post it on Twitter then link to that Twitter thread in here is that OK? As others have without comment.
Or shiuld that be on the other thread too?
Just seeking clarity. That is all
Careful. A poster from near Bury will be onto you shortly. ;-)A bit of context for the NHS, as these figures are rarely/never reported. They are for the region of England I live in.
% of beds occupied by covid positive patients. 5.4%
11200 beds of which 610 are covid patients.
total bed occupancy. 93%
critical care beds occupied. 290
critical care beds occupied by Covid positive patients. 80
610 beds occupied by C-19 patients of which 294 were diagnosed whilst inpatients.
390 patients on mechanical ventilation, 76 of which are covid positive.
oxygen beds available 10000. 450 covid positive patients and 9000 not.
Now, admittedly these figures could certainly be better, but are they the figures that mean plans b and c need to be even thought about, let alone implemented?
Apologies for posting in 2 threads but I thought it was interesting enough for both.
Apparently not
Its not doing anything like that.With the UK calling it 200k cases per day and with it doubling every 2/3 days, am I correct in saying we could have herd immunity while we've still got turkey and pickles in the fridge?
![]()
UK omicron cases running at 200,000 a day, Sajid Javid says
It comes as the NHS’ Covid alert level was raised to four, the highest possible levelwww.independent.co.uk
![]()
Omicron Covid cases ‘doubling every two to three days’ in UK, says scientist
Prof Neil Ferguson says coronavirus variant likely to be dominant strain in the UK before Christmaswww.theguardian.com
I fully get that but if it were? Would my laymans estimate be wide of the mark?Its not doing anything like that.
200k was the prediction of the LSTM model.
Not real world data. Which I published earlier
The ramblings of a loser. ;-)Careful. A poster from near Bury will be onto you shortly. ;-)
North West and Greater Manchester numbers today have fallen a lot. Very strange.
Zoe shows exactly the same by the way with numbers falling past 48 hours so much North West is now below every other region in England and only Scotland ahead of it. And only just.
In the real cases over the past 48 hours North West has fallen much as Zoe predicted from 6004 Saturday to 4428 yesterday & 3317 today. That is down from 4261 last Monday.
Meanwhile London has gone 8537 Saturday to 9969 yesterday & 11,791 today.
That is one of the highest ever regional totals in the pandemic. Not sure there were ever any higher.
It seems little doubt where Omicron is most active right now.
Every single GM borough is down both day to day and week to week. Very unusual lately.
Most places fall quite a lot too.
Have to wonder if this is a test issue - hopefully not - and the fact it mirrors Zoe is certainly a good sign.
Mondays are usually lowish but as you see that is not true everywhere today. Especially in the south.
Am I cynical in thinking if it was the North West just under 12,000 cases not London we would be in special measure lockdown locally.
But 3317 NW v 11,791 is very unexpected and you have to be a little suspicious. As though Lomdon has been well ahead of North West for a time now this gap looks unexpectedly huge.
North West tests are actually up on yesterday - from 108,673 to 122,427 - though down from 131,099 Saturday AND 136,055 last week.
London on the same three days 163,963 today V 158,407 yesterday & 186,293 Saturday and 210,793 last Monday when London had just 6333 cases.
So positivity there well up and Omicron must surely have become very prevalent there over the past 7 days.
Ok, sure we are all bored of the arguing, however just to prove my point here are 4 posts that have no reason to be in this thread that were posted earlier.Just another quick comment on todays remarkable numbers. Most of the other regions outside the south fell big today too.
Aside from London up 1800, South East was up 1800, South West up 1200 and East up 1000.
So all and more of the England rise was in the southern regions and the rest of England is actually well down on last week. West Midlands is actually down below 2000. Very low here. And is less than half what it was on Saturday.
Not sure if this supports a data issue in the midlands and north regions over past two days or is a real difference as the southern regions have been well ahead for a week or two now - at least since Omicron was even a word let alone a factor we knew about.
But the gulf today is enough to be suspicious. Though Gov UK make no reference to it as they usually do when one is identified.
Do you just pop on from time to time, randomly insult things you don’t like to read and disappear again?The ramblings of a loser. ;-)
Just seen this, no apologies required, you made some salient points, appreciated.Apologies to Hammocity for talking so bluntly. Obviously im sorry for his loss and I apologise for not acknowledging that earlier.
Of course it should go down as a Covid death. If someone has 2/3 weeks left and they last only a few days or 1 week because they catch Covid then Covid is a significant contributing factor to there death. How sick they are before this point is not really relevant at all to the diagnosis. Even if it was just the final nudge.
If someone has Covid and happens to get hit by a bus. then obviously they are not a Covid death.
There have been strict guidelines set up by the WHO since early days to say what is/is not a Covid death.
haha, most definitely.The guy posting it has 400 followers, take it with a pinch of salt. One thing for sure if it was positive news he wouldn’t have been sharing it here.
This is NOT the Covid data thread. Rules are rules, do not post this kind of data in here.A bit of context for the NHS, as these figures are rarely/never reported. They are for the region of England I live in.
% of beds occupied by covid positive patients. 5.4%
11200 beds of which 610 are covid patients.
total bed occupancy. 93%
critical care beds occupied. 290
critical care beds occupied by Covid positive patients. 80
610 beds occupied by C-19 patients of which 294 were diagnosed whilst inpatients.
390 patients on mechanical ventilation, 76 of which are covid positive.
oxygen beds available 10000. 450 covid positive patients and 9000 not.
Now, admittedly these figures could certainly be better, but are they the figures that mean plans b and c need to be even thought about, let alone implemented?
Apologies for posting in 2 threads but I thought it was interesting enough for both.
Well done in posting them againOk, sure we are all bored of the arguing, however just to prove my point here are 4 posts that have no reason to be in this thread that were posted earlier.
I have no issue with basic info that needs to be discussed.