And if Liverpool win it after beating Benfica & VillarealI think the most consistent wins the PL. That is what the points show. But best is subjective. That’s my view.
To win the Champions League you need to be the best at it. It’s just a different competition. If you navigate it better than others, then you the best at it. I look at Real Madrid in this, God forbid they beat us, but let’s say they do and win against Liverpool: they will have beat: PSG, Chelsea, us and Liverpool. Can you affirm that they the best team? I don’t know, but that sure as hell is an impressive run nonetheless
Its a tough one to call , and no idea what Pep will do , which at least will keep Ancelloti guessingMahrez's 1st touch gazumps Sterling's energy and running. We must see Mahrez starting to keep the ball and increase the pressure.
They could’ve had Ajax, Juventus and Bayern. If Villarreal and Benfica got there, they had meritAnd if Liverpool win it after beating Benfica & Villareal
Who's the fastest option available to us for the RB berth, to mark Vinicius (assuming that Walker isn't fit and/or won't be risked)? Ake? Sure I read somewhere that his injury on saturday wasn't serious. Or Eric, with Dias and Ake in the middle?
Hadn't considered him, as I assumed he was nailed on for the LB gig. Also, his form has been iffy this last few weeks.Cancelo's acceleration is top notch. Acceleration is often a more important quality in football than top speed.
Only because it meant that their team was doing well in the PL. Most wouldn't be too bothered if they didn't qualify for the next stage - they'd be more concerned with doing well in the league again.A lot of the "traditional English support" would do anything just to enter the competition never mind winning the whole thing
I don’t understand the obsession with the name of the competition. They had to give it a name and chose one that sounds good. It’s an European competition of the best teams in the continent trying to fit in clubs from many countries, period. The name of the continental competition here in South America is far more ludicrous, I assure youFor all the bullshit around the "Champions " league it is ironic that a club that didnt win their league as Champions for over 30 years are then considered the best in the europe/world.
Only in football could a team that shoudlnt even be in a "Champions" league have the opportunity to compete in the competition.
Much preferred the original european cup , only the champions took part , but UEFA are only interested in the money hence the emergence of their over hyped cup. Fully expect UEFA's pet project to be expanded with historical records of certain clubs in the competition guaranteeing a a place in the group stages , its a glamour cup that any half decent team can win if they get enough luck and decisions from officials.
League titles determine the best teams , not cup competitions no matter how fashionable.
Too obviousYou'll catch a few with that
Obviously its your choice which competition you prefer. The current format of the Champions league is way more credible than the old European Cup for determining the team they call Champions of Europe. Personally think we need to win the CL more than PL but I want bothI'd be considerably more disappointed if we don't win the PL this year.
The CL is a fraud of a competition created to line the pockets of TV companies and corrupt football administrators.
Winning the CL only makes a club 'bigger' in the eyes of the unscrupulous media.
It was a far more credible competition when Villa and Forest won it.
Exactly my point , the best teams are the ChampionsI don’t understand the obsession with the name of the competition. They had to give it a name and chose one that sounds good. It’s an European competition of the best teams in the continent trying to fit in clubs from many countries, period. The name of the continental competition here in South America is far more ludicrous, I assure you
Exactly my point , the best teams are the Champions
When they renamed it the Champions League it was only for champions.I don’t understand the obsession with the name of the competition. They had to give it a name and chose one that sounds good. It’s an European competition of the best teams in the continent trying to fit in clubs from many countries, period. The name of the continental competition here in South America is far more ludicrous, I assure you
Agreed.Obviously its your choice which competition you prefer. The current format of the Champions league is way more credible than the old European Cup for determining the team they call Champions of Europe. Personally think we need to win the CL more than PL but I want both
There was team called Bye that used to compete in the early rounds. Tried looking them up but found fck all about themIf we went back to the days where you met Malmo in the final having beaten AEK Athens and Grasshoppers Zurich I don’t think I’d be impressed.
I don’t want to speak for all City fans as everyone is different but don’t confuse hatred of UEFA with not wanting to win the CL.
The PL is much more popular than the CL on Bluemoon but generally, and in particular Worldwide, I wouldn’t be surprised if the CL was more desired.
A lot of little Englanders on BM I think.