It makes them a bit obvious though doesn’t it? Even the more discerning thicko can see the difference in reporting between us and the redtops on anything football related. It gets boring after a bit. What I would say is at least the rags get the negative stuff when they’re shit, the dippers escaped all of that.This new thing of including wages on top of transfer fee is doing my nut. I assume they will apply this too all clubs this summer then? Even that thick c*nt Micky Gray was at it just now on talkshite.
BBC Breakfast - John Watson this time.
"Liverpool are back to the top of the table...."
Really?
I had to laugh at the pre match Liverpool love-in tonight on 5 Live - Don Hutchison actually said words to the effect that , now we've signed Haaland, given his pace, teams are going to start dropping back to defend deeper against City, to guard against his pace. The result will most likely be that Haaland won't be as prolific as people think, and he had a bet with Woodgate (who, in fairness appeared to be disagreeing with him) that Harry Kane will outscore Haaland next season.
Whilst the latter is always possible, I was still laughing at the fact that Hutchison must have never watched a City game - if defences dropped any deeper against us to counter Haaland's pace, they'd be behind the f'kin goal line!
Or shots from outside the box, don't forget them.Perhaps goal difference doesn't count now and it's being done alphabetically if on equal points
The adulation and reduction in the price paid is very pro-city, I think maybe they know that they need access to Haaland to keep their ratings respectable. So toe the line.What was that?
John Watson has compromised. He now reports that Liverpool have "pulled level" with City. Try again.Perhaps goal difference doesn't count now and it's being done alphabetically if on equal points
There seems to have been a swing in their stance, "what a brilliant deal", quoting the fee accurately etc, etc. Maybe they realise they need to toe the line.What did they do ?
Pray tell
And the goals in the last ten minutes league - I think there was an 'alternative league table' done for that too.Or shots from outside the box, don't forget them.
I've just done a comparison, if you were to include shots from outside the box, in the last ten minutes, in midweek matches, the dippers would be top by two points.And the goals in the last ten minutes league - I think there was an 'alternative league table' done for that too.
I think var decides now if two teams are level on points .I've just done a comparison, if you were to include shots from outside the box, in the last ten minutes, in midweek matches, the dippers would be top by two points.
What about the committed most fouls with least Yellow cards conceded league. Or the most crosses sent into the opposition league. Or the most world classes long passes attempted league.I've just done a comparison, if you were to include shots from outside the box, in the last ten minutes, in midweek matches, the dippers would be top by two points.
Just as Pep said, the media love Liverpool.BBC Breakfast - John Watson this time.
"Liverpool are back to the top of the table...."
Really?
BBC Breakfast - John Watson this time.
"Liverpool are back to the top of the table...."
Really?
BBC Breakfast - John Watson this time.
"Liverpool are back to the top of the table...."
Really?
In todays world, it's not the facts that need to be correct, it's the narrative that needs to be right, sadly. And they all got that right.Seriously how can a National TV Company paid for from the public be aloud to get some many things wrong ?
If I kept making mistakes I would be sacked. But in 'journalism' they dont seem to have any rules.
I can understand sky, bt etc catering for the reds tops because they want subscriptions. BBC doesnt need to cater as we have to pay to watch live tv. It's a fucking disgrace and if you complain you just get a bog standard cut and paste reply.