I'd believe it.
I know I've said it before but we touch our toes when selling players out of sentiment.
England international , 27 - entering his prime , to a direct rival
fk sentiment
I'd believe it.
I know I've said it before but we touch our toes when selling players out of sentiment.
Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?Yeah cos we're holding out for £50 million for Gabby but will sell a better player for less. Clown.
Who says hes unhappy?Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?
I agree but history dictates we sell lowEngland international , 27 - entering his prime , to a direct rival
fk sentiment
Chelsea in reality might be the only club in for Sterling. Do you take what you can get now or keep an unhappy player around for a year and let him walk for free?
Yet you lot seem to think that’s what Phillips is worth!It's about the optics of it though. If we keep accepting piss taking bids for our players then that is all we will ever get. We should stand firm on £50 million for Gabby no matter how desperate he is to leave and equally we should only sell Sterling if an appropriate bid comes in.
I'd rather the players walk for free than clubs taking the piss out of us and offering fees you'd struggle to sign a decent Championship player with.
It's about the optics of it though. If we keep accepting piss taking bids for our players then that is all we will ever get. We should stand firm on £50 million for Gabby no matter how desperate he is to leave and equally we should only sell Sterling if an appropriate bid comes in.
I'd rather the players walk for free than clubs taking the piss out of us and offering fees you'd struggle to sign a decent Championship player with.
That's fair. I agree the first thing that came to mind when I saw the fee was that it was about 10M short of what I expected.It's about the optics of it though. If we keep accepting piss taking bids for our players then that is all we will ever get. We should stand firm on £50 million for Gabby no matter how desperate he is to leave and equally we should only sell Sterling if an appropriate bid comes in.
I'd rather the players walk for free than clubs taking the piss out of us and offering fees you'd struggle to sign a decent Championship player with.
we have talked here before potential replacement for Raz before
Realistically who would that be - Felix or the Milan kid Leao ?
Both would be close to 80-100 Euros
Lots of assumptions there.I don’t know why anyone is baulking at the £35m. The player doesn’t want to be here, we don’t want him, he’s ok £300k a week minimum, Chelsea don’t really need him.
It’s totally different to Jesus and no different to Mane.
It’s a good deal all round. We get £35m cash, save £15m wages for his final year. We get back what we paid for him and he has been a magnificent servant for us.
We got value for what we paid and we are getting value for his sale whilst already having his replacement here.
We don’t really have a history of selling our top players so I’m not sure what you’re basing that on.I agree but history dictates we sell low
Completely different players.We have him already. Cole Palmer.
Lots of assumptions there.
Completely different players.