I’m not sure where you’re getting this ‘very clear’ position from. I’ve seen nothing credible to suggest that’s the approach we’re taking.
Ake didn’t get the minutes because he’s Ake - he simply wasn’t as good as the other three when they were available.
We sign a different player - it’s a different situation.
This is an opportunity to strengthen our position at the back, which I’m sure is how City will be viewing it - not to simply recreate the status quo.
I would hope players of the quality and mentality of Kounde and Gvardiol would see this as an incredible opportunity and back themselves to start - not come in accepting being 4th choice.
He didn't have the World Cup to contend with in his first season or having to adjust to life in another country
Pep is convinced we don't need to replace Sterling for the left and Zinchenko should fill the requirement for him and the left back rotation.
Hope the lad trusts Pep :)
Pep is convinced we don't need to replace Sterling for the left and Zinchenko should fill the requirement for him and the left back rotation.
Hope the lad trusts Pep :)
We are well covered for all competitions even if Ake does leave
A week ago Couldn’t see it no. Now I’m starting to think we might.To be honest as long as Peps on board and thinks he has what he needs I am too. If he wants a player then I’d hope he would get one.
Its possible Doyle could do a job,but its still a huge gamble at this stage of his development.I think anyone that thinks that, has either not watched the last few seasons, or has watched them through a prism of buemoon transfer window parochialisms.
Players still have that difficulty of trying to adjust and with the World Cup being in the middle of the season and with the players ahead of them in our team they would probably not take the risk of uprooting this time around. There is a great chance all our 3 CBs will stay injury free and the new signing would only get the Cup games.
I am willing to bet you that all 3 of our CBs will not stay injury free all season. Has that ever even happened, that all CBs were available 100% of the time?
Out of the players who play left back at the club one is probably going to prison and will not play for us again regardless. One is midfielder who Pep has turned into a left back and tends not to be wide left back and will probably be sold the other is a right back who is a better left back who cuts inside and another is a CB who doesn’t play out wideCity are still moving for a leftback. And Gvardiol isn’t what Pep wants in a lb. kinda waste to spend 60-80m on him. It’s evident they want a lb for a change in system where the fullback stretches the pitch.
Dias, Stones and Laporte were all available for the majority of 20/21 I think. That's why Laporte got frustrated at not playing when he was available, because Dias and Stones were in the team ahead of him every week
When the eff did Zinchenko become a winger...greater chance of him moving to Everton than of him playing as a winger at City...Ha there is no way Pep will play Zinchenko as a winger in any PL or CL game.
When the eff did Zinchenko become a winger...
Majority is not all is it. There were absences that year too. Minor ones, but they weren't fit and available every single game. That's before you even consider suspensions, covid etc. That is why clubs build squads with multiple players, it is very much an expectation that players need rotated and aren't always available.
I think circumstances dictated he had to be!Watch the Aston Villa game again and he's pretty much a winger rather than a left back in that game.
Players can be whatever Pep says they can be. He can be very effective as a more attacking player especially if he has a full back over lapping him, or he’s under lapping a full back.When the eff did Zinchenko become a winger...greater chance of him moving to Everton than of him playing as a winger at City...
I think circumstances dictated he had to be!