Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Same here, we are in Skiathos at present, seen quite a few City shirts for sale with Haaland on the back.
With the family in Zakopane (Polish mountains) this week. Saw a lot of City and Haaland mugs in random street markets. Hilarious how our profile has increased so much since pre pandemic.

Imagine what it will be like after Erling scores a goal a game and helps win us the Champions League.
 
Same here, we are in Skiathos at present, seen quite a few City shirts for sale with Haaland on the back.
It's become so I react with surprise when I see a rags shirt here on the Fylde coast. Ten years ago they were everywhere so you didn't even notice. Lamentable dippers shirts everywhere I regret to say.
 
The Guardian shocker, Rich man gets Richer......WOW! What isn't pointed out is that Sheikh Mansour was investigating the possibility of investing in a Premier league club before buying City and rumour was his preferred club was Liverpool. This is a City a number of years ago was selling properties for £1 wonder what the Sheffield bods think about that that? The report says there are nine areas sold at a lower price than nearby sites,where? Hale maybe. I remember talking to a lady some years ago, she had been offered a terrace house near the Etihad for £12,000 she turned it down thinking It was in a downbeat area. Within a year of the takeover the same property sold for around £100K she was obviously kicking herself but as she said the stadium was there but nothing else.If you go back to 1993 and the 2000 Olympic bid, there was a plan to build an 80,000 stadium on the present site, a number of company's compulsory purchased and then a stitch up whereby the sneering snobs were asking " where would you rather visit Manchester or Sydney? and London will be the only City considered in the UK" three years later it took a terrorist bomb to kickstart the regeneration which has enabled the emergence of a modern City. So then comes the London Olympic bid and with a pat on the head plummy voiced London centric suits imply that the Capital would be bidding but as a payoff you northern oiks can have the Commonwealth games and don't forget to touch your forlocks. So the site earmarked for the main arena is obviously the area where the Olympic bid stadium was to be built. Though a lesser competition there would still be a substantial amount needed to cover the costs of staging the event.To avoid the main stadium becoming a white elephant an anchor tenant would be needed or the alternative would be to build a temporary arena and demolish it afterwards and so they say the rest is history. For a lot of us moving to the new stadium was strange. Who can forget the sneering rags lined up on the balconies every other week,their smirking faces indicating their thoughts were you might have moved into a new council house but you're still shit and our returning glances acknowledging that we may be shit but you're the ones living in a shithole. So fast forward to today, the sneering rags have disappeared and the area is unrecognisable to 2003 Large swathes of east Manchester have changed considerably and initially that can be thanks to MCFC agreeing to become leaseholders (also part of the deal was over 16 acres of the Maine rd site being part of the deal) and as such Manchester City Council in partnership have enhanced the quality of life of a large number of its residents by providing better quality homes and increasing the value of private property owners.
Does any one know if local residents were displaced, as the area became gentrified. I think the lack of affordable housing is an oversight / failing of the council. We all know that Sheik Mansour is a shrewd business man,, and the whole of cfg and development of East Manchester is about investment and making money. I know as a fan he's made my life better. I'd like to think that he's made the lives better off people who were living around the stadium. (In stark contrast to fsg buying houses around
Anfield and letting them rot to drive down prices)
 
It's become so I react with surprise when I see a rags shirt here on the Fylde coast. Ten years ago they were everywhere so you didn't even notice. Lamentable dippers shirts everywhere I regret to say.
So true. I am not far away from you and there are lots of Liverpool and City shirts, certainly on anyone under 30. Used to see the Rags packing out the pubs for broadcast matches but they have vanished. I think United are really suffering locally these days because of a double whammy from their two biggest rivals. Presumably this is damaging them hugely across the globe as well.
 
I was there last week and the first morning in the hotel breakfast room was a Greek family, 2 of them in City shirts !!
Tbh I'm amazed at how big a name he is over here. Bigger than Aguero already?? When we first used to come to Greece 10yrs ago you would struggle to find any City shirt.
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20220722-WA0045.jpeg
    IMG-20220722-WA0045.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 120
Does any one know if local residents were displaced, as the area became gentrified. I think the lack of affordable housing is an oversight / failing of the council. We all know that Sheik Mansour is a shrewd business man,, and the whole of cfg and development of East Manchester is about investment and making money. I know as a fan he's made my life better. I'd like to think that he's made the lives better off people who were living around the stadium. (In stark contrast to fsg buying houses around
Anfield and letting them rot to drive down prices)
Hardly anyone used to live in Ancoats. It was mostly Brownfield post-industrial sites as was the New Islington area. Gentrification has not really made many inroads into Beswick itself but that may come later. The area has been dramatically improved though with new schools, new community space, a community hub etc etc. The lack of affordable housing is a problem all over Manchester, especially in places like Chorlton. The city has been a victim of its own success to some extent.
 
We’ve only had two pre-season friendlies! The other one was covered too, btw.

View attachment 50718
Tbf it was only mentioned in passing on their daily blog and a tiny report on the City page, not on the main football page. A united open training session literally got more coverage on the football homepage than either of our games.
I know they had to try and justify the expense of sending Stone out there to cover them but the double standards have been ever more glaring this summer
Haaland and Phillips’ official unveiling got only a cursory mention the following morning. Ortega’s signing not covered at all on the main page
They’re doubling down on us
 
I have decided to make a freedom of information request to find out how much Simon Stones jolly with the Rags has cost….
Don't waste your time
I made one for Dan Roan's interview with Maguire and I received....

Thank you for your request to the BBC of 28th August 2020 seeking the following information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’):

With regard to an interview with Harry Maguire, conducted by Dan Roan which was broadcast on the BBC One 10 o'clock news on Thursday 27th August 2020
I request two pieces of information
1/ In which country was the interview conducted?
2/ Who paid for Dan Roan's travel, accommodation and sustenance?
I look forward to you furnishing me with the information requested

The information you have requested is excluded from the Act because if held it would be held for the purposes of ‘journalism, art or literature.’ The BBC is therefore not obliged to provide this information to you and will not be doing so on this occasion. Part VI of Schedule 1 to FOIA provides that information held by the BBC and the other public service broadcasters is only covered by the Act if it is held for ‘purposes other than those of journalism, art or literature”. The BBC is not required to supply information held for the purposes of creating the BBC’s output or information that supports and is closely associated with these creative activities1
.

The limited application of the Act to public service broadcasters was to protect freedom of
expression and the rights of the media under Article 10 European Convention on Human Rights
(“ECHR”). The BBC, as a media organisation, is under a duty to impart information and ideas on
all matters of public interest and the importance of this function has been recognised by the
European Court of Human Rights. Maintaining our editorial independence is a crucial factor in
enabling the media to fulfil this function. However, the BBC makes a huge range of information
available about our programmes and content on bbc.co.uk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nmc
If people think that there is not a deliberate policy to ignore City by the British media at the moment, they are sadly mistaken.

Let's examine some facts. Haaland is undoubtedly one of the biggest signings in Premier League history. He is one of the highest profile players in the world and potentially developing into the best player in the world over the coming years. We are not talking about a world star past his best or a very young player with loads of potential e.g. Ronaldo signing with United on both occasions or Vinicius Jnr for Real Madrid.

Haaland's signing and the prospect of future success at City also poses an enormous threat to the brands of Manchester United and Liverpool. It therefore seems logical that they would call on their friends in the media to limit the potential damage.

An iconic world star at City is a potential game changer in club finances as well as on the pitch. If current story's are to be believed, United would allow Ronaldo to leave on a year's loan to Athletico, only if he signs on for a further year with them. From a footballing perspective this makes little sense, however it illustrates the financial and commercial benefits that accrue from retaining an iconic star.

I believe our owners view the British media as an inevitable and but relatively insignificant obstacle. They are working towards creating a worldwide fan base for the club and there is an advantage to being seen as a young vibrant side who are not part of the old favoured guard of powerful clubs.

Young football fans even in the UK want something different and will in my opinion be increasingly attracted to City. They do not get their updates from the BBC or the Mail. They ignore Facebook as old school and look more to online content provided by club channels to learn about their club. In this regard City are well ahead of the rivals and its development is part of our clubs strategy overtake our rivals.

Various British media organisations have provided the minimum possible coverage of the Haaland debut. Undoubtedly this will have the blessing of our local neighbours as they fight to be relevant on any level. From a wider perspective however, they can not halt our increasing popularity to a worldwide audience. The number of youtube views of our match highlights compares favourably to our media backed rivals. Haalands post match interviews were conducted by media outlets from various parts of the world in multiple languages. The increasing blue shirts and chants from the stands also illustrated our growing popularity.

Personally I have decided to stop using BBC football online for any information, for the coming season. They do not deserve one click.
 
Don't waste your time
I made one for Dan Roan's interview with Maguire and I received....

Thank you for your request to the BBC of 28th August 2020 seeking the following information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’):

With regard to an interview with Harry Maguire, conducted by Dan Roan which was broadcast on the BBC One 10 o'clock news on Thursday 27th August 2020
I request two pieces of information
1/ In which country was the interview conducted?
2/ Who paid for Dan Roan's travel, accommodation and sustenance?
I look forward to you furnishing me with the information requested

The information you have requested is excluded from the Act because if held it would be held for the purposes of ‘journalism, art or literature.’ The BBC is therefore not obliged to provide this information to you and will not be doing so on this occasion. Part VI of Schedule 1 to FOIA provides that information held by the BBC and the other public service broadcasters is only covered by the Act if it is held for ‘purposes other than those of journalism, art or literature”. The BBC is not required to supply information held for the purposes of creating the BBC’s output or information that supports and is closely associated with these creative activities1
.

The limited application of the Act to public service broadcasters was to protect freedom of
expression and the rights of the media under Article 10 European Convention on Human Rights
(“ECHR”). The BBC, as a media organisation, is under a duty to impart information and ideas on
all matters of public interest and the importance of this function has been recognised by the
European Court of Human Rights. Maintaining our editorial independence is a crucial factor in
enabling the media to fulfil this function. However, the BBC makes a huge range of information
available about our programmes and content on bbc.co.uk.
Not answerable to the public who fund them. What's to hide? Bloody Shiesters.
 
If people think that there is not a deliberate policy to ignore City by the British media at the moment, they are sadly mistaken.

Let's examine some facts. Haaland is undoubtedly one of the biggest signings in Premier League history. He is one of the highest profile players in the world and potentially developing into the best player in the world over the coming years. We are not talking about a world star past his best or a very young player with loads of potential e.g. Ronaldo signing with United on both occasions or Vinicius Jnr for Real Madrid.

Haaland's signing and the prospect of future success at City also poses an enormous threat to the brands of Manchester United and Liverpool. It therefore seems logical that they would call on their friends in the media to limit the potential damage.

An iconic world star at City is a potential game changer in club finances as well as on the pitch. If current story's are to be believed, United would allow Ronaldo to leave on a year's loan to Athletico, only if he signs on for a further year with them. From a footballing perspective this makes little sense, however it illustrates the financial and commercial benefits that accrue from retaining an iconic star.

I believe our owners view the British media as an inevitable and but relatively insignificant obstacle. They are working towards creating a worldwide fan base for the club and there is an advantage to being seen as a young vibrant side who are not part of the old favoured guard of powerful clubs.

Young football fans even in the UK want something different and will in my opinion be increasingly attracted to City. They do not get their updates from the BBC or the Mail. They ignore Facebook as old school and look more to online content provided by club channels to learn about their club. In this regard City are well ahead of the rivals and its development is part of our clubs strategy overtake our rivals.

Various British media organisations have provided the minimum possible coverage of the Haaland debut. Undoubtedly this will have the blessing of our local neighbours as they fight to be relevant on any level. From a wider perspective however, they can not halt our increasing popularity to a worldwide audience. The number of youtube views of our match highlights compares favourably to our media backed rivals. Haalands post match interviews were conducted by media outlets from various parts of the world in multiple languages. The increasing blue shirts and chants from the stands also illustrated our growing popularity.

Personally I have decided to stop using BBC football online for any information, for the coming season. They do not deserve one click.

All correct, but I wish people would realise it is due to the people who own the club rather than Mcfc as an entity.
It is twofold Liverpool and United are seen as part of the institution the owners of City are everything the institution despise.
 
Hardly anyone used to live in Ancoats. It was mostly Brownfield post-industrial sites as was the New Islington area. Gentrification has not really made many inroads into Beswick itself but that may come later. The area has been dramatically improved though with new schools, new community space, a community hub etc etc. The lack of affordable housing is a problem all over Manchester, especially in places like Chorlton. The city has been a victim of its own success to some extent.
Ancoats was where lots of people lived when no-one lived in the 'city centre'. Terraced streets north of the 'northern quarter' before it was the 'northern quarter', Cardroom estate before being cleared for New Islington (and residents promised social housing in New Islington), and the former slum of Victoria Square.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top