Queen Elizabeth II

Yes, I am for real.

Let us break this down:

"he was friends with a..." so if I'm friend with a bad person (and I don't know about why they are bad) does that make me bad too?

You make reference to 'young girls' but my point is 17 isn't young: in fact when I was that age, the 17 year old girls were much more mature than me and usually wanted to go out with lads aged 20+ (to my and my mates annoyance).

Did he know she was 'trafficked' and again, that is a very emotive word. Trafficked is usually associated with sex workers crossing the channel etc. I assume with this situation it was totally different, yet the same terminology is still applied?

Why? Maybe because some people want to have a pop at the royal family and he is the easiest target to shoot at.

If you knew your friend was a convicted nonce and still visited his private island full of young girls, then yes you're a bad person.

17 is underage in America. She was groomed and then flown to countries with lower age of consent laws, this is trafficking. It's basic knowledge. Arguing the technicalities of age is something paedophiles do to justify what they do.

Since he paid her £12m I'd say yes he probably knew she was underage. If he wasn't the queen's son, he'd have been extradited and sent to prison.

Yes poor Andrew being an easy target, you have your priorities all wrong.

I'm muting you as I don't want to engage with someone so stupid.
 
If you knew your friend was a convicted nonce and still visited his private island full of young girls, then yes you're a bad person.

17 is underage in America. She was groomed and then flown to countries with lower age of consent laws, this is trafficking. It's basic knowledge. Arguing the technicalities of age is something paedophiles do to justify what they do.

Since he paid her £12m I'd say yes he probably knew she was underage. If he wasn't the queen's son, he'd have been extradited and sent to prison.

Yes poor Andrew being an easy target, you have your priorities all wrong.

I'm muting you as I don't want to engage with someone so stupid.
Flip his argument round and we’re just lucky Epstein didn’t have a private island in Japan where the age of consent is 13.
 
I notice Network Rail can now run overnight trains on the network to get people to and from London during the lying in state. It would be nice if they could get the train companies to run them in the daytime too, especially Avanti and TPE.

 
There will be a great many - very decent - people that will be in photos with Saville..........

People just deliberately use photos out of context

Heads of state of every nation and the representatives of them would have met loads of unsavoury people in their duties.

Pinochet
Saddam
Gadaffi

All were met with a hand that was shook knowing what they were about, but you're fucked if you went on a beeb program with nonce slebs.
 
Think I once read that the Queen/ King can vote legally but tradition dictates that they voluntarily choose not to.
 
Yes, I am for real.

Let us break this down:

"he was friends with a..." so if I'm friend with a bad person (and I don't know about why they are bad) does that make me bad too?

You make reference to 'young girls' but my point is 17 isn't young: in fact when I was that age, the 17 year old girls were much more mature than me and usually wanted to go out with lads aged 20+ (to my and my mates annoyance).

Did he know she was 'trafficked' and again, that is a very emotive word. Trafficked is usually associated with sex workers crossing the channel etc. I assume with this situation it was totally different, yet the same terminology is still applied?

Why? Maybe because some people want to have a pop at the royal family and he is the easiest target to shoot at.
WOW he is a pervert of the highest order, he , Maxwell and Epstein knew exactly what the score was.

We have only heard the one story, I am certain there are lots more out there that have been kept quite.

He is a very wrong un, he was at it long before Epstein appeared.
 
A lot of people will go down to London wanting to pay their respects. I'm concerned that there maybe too many and some very emotional royalists will blow their tops in grief should they not be able to visit her in the alloted time.

At work, staff have been told to prepare for high passenger numbers going down to London by train.
I can imagine there are plenty of overseas tourists in the que, and if the Brit Royals miss out because of them I can see some "situations" arising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top