City Hobgoblin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 5,093
What about points deductions / European bans for clubs with fans who endanger other spectators' safety through jibbing in and distribution of fake tickets?n
So now Liverpool want to control what fans can and can’t sing at football games? Let’s see how much traction this one gets…BBC News now.
A Hillsborough Family Association member wants clubs to be fined or points deducted for chants like always the victims by their fans.
In the report the BBC specifically linked the 'always the victims' chant to 'Hillsborough'.
Munich chants by Liverpool fans were mentioned as well in the report.
Watch the BBC news, the report should be shown again after 9am.
Never happened mate.What about points deductions / European bans for clubs with fans who endanger other spectators' safety through jibbing in and distribution of fake tickets?n
Consider it confirmed.If that was the case, it would confirm to me the club are completely out of touch with our fan base and have a very limited knowledge of the dippers fan base bordering on naive.
Simple fact is that if they were able to identify the City fan who did this: https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...-news/moment-madness-landed-city-fan-13694742That’s a possibility of course and maybe time will tell.
Like I said, I’d be amazed if the CCTV didn’t at least raise sufficient grounds for suspicion, given the object that was thrown, and the fact that the time and (I expect) the general area it came from would be readily identifiable. It’s hardly needle in a haystack territory.
I think that sadly the club confirmed that with the open letter /email thing and the decision to put the away fans in that section:-(If that was the case, it would confirm to me the club are completely out of touch with our fan base and have a very limited knowledge of the dippers fan base bordering on naive.
If that was the case, it would confirm to me the club are completely out of touch with our fan base and have a very limited knowledge of the dippers fan base bordering on naive.
Not a conspiracy but it took “the Club” 10 minutes to condemn our fan base for a few piss cans singing during a minute’s silence, no City fan knew about in advance. That was the FA Cup semi final. Can you not see the inconsistent treatment?Why would anyone believe that was the case?
Why would some posters believe the club is involved in a conspiracy with GMP and Liverpool to cover up the crime and shield Liverpool from bad PR rather than accept it might take a couple of weeks to review all the footage and identify people who could be covering their faces or be in the wrong seat or in the aisle or be obstructed by fans around them, gather witness statements etc. and then arrest them and publicise it?
Why would anyone believe that was the case?
Why would some posters believe the club is involved in a conspiracy with GMP and Liverpool to cover up the crime and shield Liverpool from bad PR rather than accept it might take a couple of weeks to review all the footage and identify people who could be covering their faces or be in the wrong seat or in the aisle or be obstructed by fans around them, gather witness statements etc. and then arrest them and publicise it?
Is it not part of a wider pattern though. For example, when “the Club” accepted a vastly reduced ticket allocation for the swamp in the Cup and there were rumours the OSC had threatened to break off relations.I think that sadly the club confirmed that with the open letter /email thing and the decision to put the away fans in that section:-(
Not a conspiracy but it took “the Club” 10 minutes to condemn our fan base for a few piss cans singing during a minute’s silence, no City fan knew about in advance. That was the FA Cup semi final. Can you not see the inconsistent treatment?
Why has the father of the 15 year old girl only thanked match going Blues, first aiders and the CEO of LFC?why are you comparing a police investigation and a pr statement on social media as if they’re the same thing?
That’s why you’re finding inconsistency, because you’re ignoring the fact the club immediately condemned the Liverpool fans behaviour and have instead decided that someone being arrested is the point of comparison.
Tbh I get to a degree that the club want to be seen as trying to dampen things down a bit mate, they can hardly be seen to be encouraging it which if they refused to cooperate etc then they likely would, I just think they got some of it very wrong, my general point though is that us fans knew exactly what was going to happen, if we knew, then the club should have had a good idea too and put certain measures in place, they didn’t, which says to me they don’t have a great knowledge of Liverpool fans and any history between the two cities ?I think that sadly the club confirmed that with the open letter /email thing and the decision to put the away fans in that section:-(
Perhaps not so much downplaying but more not giving the media hourly updates as they're as guilty as anyone at stoking those fires?I get the feeling that at present the emphasis is on dampening down off pitch rivalry between the two clubs and downplaying stuff like this in the interests of improving relations or not stoking trouble between the fans? I'd imagine letting this incident pass may even be part of that as I'd be surprised if we don't have the ticketing and CCTV tech to pin down the culprits.
Why has the father of the 15 year old girl only thanked match going Blues, first aiders and the CEO of LFC?
If it’s the intention of the club/police to let this die down in order to de-escalate the growing tension between the clubs the girl’s father could pursue a private prosecution and request those tapes. That would be be even more embarrassing for the club if it showed a clear image of the culprit. For that reason, I don’t believe the club can conceal or fail in its duty to the fans. Maybe he’s waiting to see how it pans out?Why has the father of the 15 year old girl only thanked match going Blues, first aiders and the CEO of LFC?
Why do you think fans of LFC keep their perceived injustices, in the media spotlight? Why did the father of the 15 year old girl speak to the press?Perhaps not so much downplaying but more not giving the media hourly updates as they're as guilty as anyone at stoking those fires?
Maybe it's still going ahead quietly without needing to keep everyone updated constantly.
"I cannot speak more highly of the way the club have conducted themselves since the incident"
Is what he had to say about City.
The footage I have seen showed a dipper fan throwing things into the tier below but I do not think it can nail him as the one that threw the glass that injured the young girl. I am encouraged by the statement from the girl's father about how the club and GMP are handling this matter. The guy seems sensible and not the type to be bought off.If it’s the intention of the club/police to let this die down in order to de-escalate the growing tension between the clubs the girl’s father could pursue a private prosecution and request those tapes. That would be be even more embarrassing for the club if it showed a clear image of the culprit. For that reason, I don’t believe the club can conceal or fail in its duty to the fans. Maybe he’s waiting to see how it pans out?
Maybe the club and his family are in contact and he's happy (relatively speaking) with what's happening. Has he said anything recently on social media?If it’s the intention of the club/police to let this die down in order to de-escalate the growing tension between the clubs the girl’s father could pursue a private prosecution and request those tapes. That would be be even more embarrassing for the club if it showed a clear image of the culprit. For that reason, I don’t believe the club can conceal or fail in its duty to the fans. Maybe he’s waiting to see how it pans out?