Why did we let Zinchenko go?

One game, let's not forget how the clowns were shaping around him.
West Ham targeted that side more with great effect. Took a few tweaks to stablise and get an important point. Could of nicked a win if Mahrez didn't miss the pen.
Personally I thought he was the main reason we won the league last season the way he performed in last game against Villa was brilliant
As impact sub defintely but as regular I am not so sure he is what Pep was looking for in a full-back
 
Sadly he wanted to go and I think we were right to accept that, the problem as always he left for a fee City would never get quoted for a player of similar profile and experience.
 
Funny how players get better by their absence - he was a decent wall to pass off for the better players, he had no pace so could only play against the teams that didn't have a pacey right winger and it wasn't very often he'd beat a man and get a cross in.
Managed to beat his man and get a cross in when it really, really mattered, though, didn't he?

80
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
Funny how players get better by their absence - he was a decent wall to pass off for the better players, he had no pace so could only play against the teams that didn't have a pacey right winger and it wasn't very often he'd beat a man and get a cross in.
He came on and help change the game against Villa when we were 0-2 down. We did drop a bollock letting him go. Absolutely no doubt about that.
 
I could probably put money on half the people saying they miss him and why did we sell him are the same people who slagged him off after games lol

He was ok and definitely better than what we have but come on we didn't sell the 90s Roberto Carlos.
He was getting better & better for me as the season went on last season & shown what mentally he had to go through the shit he was back home & put in the performances he was ie Villa game at home
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top