PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The whole Mancini thing, that’s been doing the rounds for literally years, is that he was paid by Sheikh Mansour or a representative ahead of him becoming City manager. Now this is based entirely on the hacked info from that Portuguese fraudster, but putting that aside, unless there is absolute proof I.e. Mancini showed his bank details or the third party in question acknowledged they had made this payment it’s not actually hard evidence, I could for example put a cheque into my bank account for one million pounds, my balance would show one million pounds but I couldn’t withdraw it, scammers do it all the time. Everything about this stinks, the “one hundred” rule breaks to smear our centurions season, the anniversary of Munich to cast us in the worst possible light. It’s all shit and smears. Cunts.
 
Goone0304 said:
'fashionable brands' what are you talking about, your revenues are higher than Real Madrid and Man United, your as 'fashionable as they come. Your a mainstream club with global revenues higher than all other clubs

Although I think that's might be the problem. Your revenues are higher than Man Uniteds and Real Madrid..............why.
Click to expand...
Because:
1. We are better at selling our sponsorship packages than most.
2. Sponsors are seeking exposure especially on tv. We get miles more global tv coverage than Real and more than Manu in N. and S. America and Middle East.
 
Maly said:
No idea mate, but if a player is willing to take an illegal bung, do you really think they’d be paying taxes on it?

I know I didn’t, mine just came in a bags full of £50’s ;)
Click to expand...

He could have struck a deal with HMRC, give evidence no prosecution.
 
manimanc said:
Solekhol prick going on about der spiegel emails!

Can't stop laughing at the desperation.

This is absolute comedy.

Wasn't groundhog day last week? Think it's been extended to toda
Click to expand...
SidJames said:
Were those emails not selectively taken out of context of bigger conversations to create a narrative ?

I could be wrong. I seem to recall we provided the real "FULL" conversations to explain away what was supposedly incriminating evidence.
Click to expand...
This is what I couldn,t understand when Solekhol said it on sky sports news, I thought they had already been proven useless by CAS in that context, I was thinking why didn’t Wedderburn say , “the same hacked emails disproven at CAS”…… then he said thanks to Solekhol for being “all over the facts” of this huge story,
 
If we'd been paying players/staff off the books for almost 15 years, it's a fucking miracle its taken until now for one of them to apparently grass us up. Sounds like bullshit
 
decmancity said:
It just needs to be a ex player or staff member who got a payment off the books and the paper trail to prove it.
Click to expand...
How do you prove an off the Book payment ?

With no supporting Paper evidence

Surely it comes down to the disgruntled former employee, making an allegation against a former employer.

He says he received a payment.

Employer says he is a lying fucker, that "Yes" has received a payment..... not from us. From those who put him/her up to doing this.

And surely this is also a serious crime and would involve HMRC as it would be an established tax evading business practice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top