Would help if the spelling was correct
Thanks for that.My recollection is that:
Fordham (or whatever the name was at the time) paid City XX million for the image rights, giving an immediate boost to our figures. I think it was about 25-30M, which was a big percentage of the club income.
Image rights then were handled by Fordham in their entirety - PB has said earlier (I think I have this right) that image rights aren't wages, and the club don't have to include them.
The trouble is that Fordham are an ADUG company, and as no-one had done this before in English football, it could be viewed as owner investment, or exceeding fair value. I don't know if it's known what the repayment plan was, if any.
What ended up happening was that UEFA changed the rules of what was covered by FFP, and the revised version included related companies like Fordham; City brought the rights back in-house and collapsed the company.
I don't know how it feeds into the charges.
YeahMy lad showed me this. Not recent is it
Heard it before!Not me, the machine!
I like the cut of your jib.We are not guilty, we will be successful in beating the charges and there will therefore be no punishment for anything. Not even for failing to cooperate in my opinion.
There will be a clear out of its leadership (and hopefully deep reflection and contrition) if it’s found they lacked necessary evidence to underpin these incendiary accusations. The cartel will be exposed.Not sure how correct that is. The PL will still exist as an organization and business and competition. It will only lose its ability to self regulate its members and rules. That will be vested in an independent regulator.
I hope you set Zabba on them!Fuck me, just took the dog (who we named Zaba) to the park. Immediately heard 3 Rags talking and it was like City bingo: Dirty oil money, Arabs, cheats, going down, this city is yours etc etc
Probably the first time they’ve worn their United clobber in a decade.
It’s about as far away from libel as it’s possible to be.How is it libellous to state a true fact? There was a letter, sent by 9 clubs, he quoted those 9 clubs by name, in what way does that constitute libel?
Is she doing the Poznan...??
Great article apart fromDon’t know if anyone has already posted this but here is an alternative view from, of all places, The Sun.
![]()
City owners arguably the most loved in football, jealous rivals should pipe down
IT HAS always been the most tribal of sports. One where the mood of an entire week can be shaped by 90 minutes. Eternally driven by emotion. And over the past few days we have had further proof of …www.thesun.co.uk
I've sent a copy of this to Lucy Frazer MP to ask her to find out why no action was taken about this.My lad showed me this. Not recent is it
Indeed the sentiment is spot on but, we take the piss out of other teams stuff with shit grammar & spelling.Would help if the spelling was correct
If the yanks get their way it will be c closed shop no relegation of promotion and the clubs keep their own Tv moneyJust contemplating how the PL league will look in a few years time when we return to the top after relegation to non-league (not happening I know).
The 'americanisation' of the PL will be complete. I say we adopt Man City Cheatahs as our show name ;)
thought we wasnt cooperatingI read a tweet I think from a journo saying “City are trying to drown the PL in paper” Wish I could remember who it was.
He only said the first bitI've sent a copy of this to Lucy Frazer MP to ask her to find out why no action was taken about this
Obviously mistaking us with the ragsGreat article apart from
Yes, City have made a few cock-ups with their managerial appointments, but the good has very much outweighed the bad.
Each one has won the PL
Good point that you make, must be in the thousands for the computer hack.Over 100 crimes. Each individual instance of unauthorised access is a crime in itself.