Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,378
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
It's hardly necessary to take the piss, just collect it - most people wind themselves up ;-)We certainly have our wums, eh.
It's hardly necessary to take the piss, just collect it - most people wind themselves up ;-)We certainly have our wums, eh.
Do you need legal advice Ric?With the greatest respect to you both, that’s nonsense. There are a few legal experts on here, including KCs, whose input is greatly valued by many, myself included.
I love the fact you have used that wonderful Anglo Saxon word - BOLLOCKS.I can see your point there could be a ripple and people love football gos, but I’m just not convinced.
If it’s a technicality or whatever, never forget the rule is absolute bollocks, in fact so much detail in all aspects of this you can lose that.
In tax law they have a mosaic rule, of rather then look at the pieces step back and look at the picture.
We have one club that has been transformed, the academy, stadium, surrounding area etc. and one that’s run down.
They are putting more and more pressure on spending/ investing less, pretty sure the goal is 70% on transfers/ agent fees and wages.
Which leaves 30% for running costs, but mainly I assume to get some decent profit out of the game for their owners, providing a good income and a raise in the value of the club.
Anyway we all know that, so it makes no difference to us.
Plus other fans give no credit, Ferguson bullied refs and they had way more money then anyone else, Chelsea was backed by oil money, Liverpool doped them all up.
Arsenal with Henry, Pires, Bergkamp under Wenger, I do give a lot of credit for and for me is the one team who could match some of ours for the way they played. That said am I giving them credit or do I just like them because it was them or United.
Leicester were quality but again everyone claimed it was doping.
There is of course nothing stopping those who are no longer interested, from simply not reading any more posts in this thread…With the greatest respect to you both, that’s nonsense. There are a few legal experts on here, including KCs, whose input is greatly valued by many, myself included.
Hope It's chocolate fudge.Being serious; it will take some time to be resolved and in my opinion will be a fudge.
For Kalvin Phillips?Hope It's chocolate fudge.
Is the correct response.Stop linking this shite.
Look at his user name. I think he actually lives in lalala land.Fucking hell, what video where you watching mate
Or our scouting system data baseYou mean like, is it illegal to hack someone's emails?
did he ? thought it was earlier than that , my mistakeHe only raised his flag when the ball was in the net
I've seen some very insightful posts on Red Cafe. Not so much on RAWK. Some of the United posters are knowledgeable about the areas that are important to them - Glazers, how their spending is affected by FFP etc. But they haven't had the same scrutiny we have had over FFP, so I find they don't have the depth of knowledge some of our guys are able to offer.Do you not think there are similar legal experts on RAWKous or RagCafe explaining the ins and outs of the UEFA hearing, the CAS judgement and the likely charges and a breakdown of the substantive issues raised by the PL.
I mean these people will want to be informed so they can debate the issues objectively amongst themselves and with City fans they meet.
Good for you for having the courage to post regardless of the potential backlash. It wasn't that long ago that many refused to believe there was an agenda. People who questioned decisions on a regular basis that usually favoured certain teams and penalised City were treated with scepticism. Dismissive comments like " tin foil hats " " blue tinted spectacles " and the old favourite " the table doesn't lie " were trotted out. Certain comments were reported about the " brand " and a " strategic plan " being in place and some didn't even question that. Added to the odd decisions seen at an ever increasing rate with every passing game as City grew stronger, some still refuse to believe. These decisions in favour of some teams and against others along with the introduction of VAR means that the excuse of " human error " can no no longer be as readily accepted as it used to be. City once again put out of the Champions League against Spurs because the one frame showing the handball conclusively was unavailable to the referee. Sheffield United competing against Manchester United for top four score a goal against Villa but goal line technology wasn't working, against Brentford a penalty in favour of City not given where the Brentford player had the ball in both hands on the line " inconclusive ". With every passing game the conspiracy theorists seem less and less suspect.@M18CTID - appreciate your comments (and the character verification!).
When I was told this yesterday, I reacted in the way most on here have. A mixture of disbelief and laughter if I'm honest. After 40 years of supporting City and hearing every conceivable terrace conspiracy theory known to man, it was going to be filed with the rest, but when it became obvious that the guy I was talking to was deadly serious and there was more to this than a simple conspiracy theory, I started to take an interest. He mentioned a couple of names who could "verify" his claims, one of whom I spoke to and I was told exactly the same thing. I'm also aware that a reasonably well known City twitter account has the same information. I'm not some wet behind the ears snotty-nosed kid, I'm what is commonly known on these pages as an FOC. A typical Mancunian cynic in all things in life, don't seek the limelight and I'm generally apathetic to stuff like this. However, in MY opinion, there is substance to this and anyone who thinks it isn't possible that such a conversation took place (and was recorded) is living in the dark ages.
Anyway, I just want to clarify a couple of things:
There's a very big difference between blackmail and leverage.
The recording wasn't obtained by surreptitious means in any way linked to the Club, whether that be by Middle Eastern special forces, Chinese weather balloons or MI5. It has been handed to the club by a third party.
The intervening "voice" on the recording was not part of the matchday on field team, not a member of the VAR team and not the matchday commander.
The on field referee received an instruction from the intervening voice, who allegedly used the phrase "levelling up".
The "dossier" I mentioned in my original email is my take on things, I have not suggested that the club has one, I'm simply expressing my opinion, although I'd be amazed if they didn't have one.
The club who have distanced themselves from the Nasty 9 is Burnley.
By posting what I did yesterday, I knew I was potentially setting myself up to be a laughing stock, accused of being a raving lunatic, a complete & utter fantasist. My PM's cover all those bases, trust me. Each to their own, I've got broad shoulders. But ask yourself this...why would a perfectly normal, regular Joe City fan, put himself through the ringer like this, if he wasn't confident in the information he was given?
Yes, it could be bullshit, but then again, it could very well be true. There's many, many scandals over the years that were scarcely believable at the time. Scandals that would never have seen the light of day but for the meanderings of some FOC on a faceless platform.
Is football in this country as squeaky clean as they'd have you believe? Yeah....right, sure it is.
The truth will out.
Up the fucking Blues.
Make of this what you will, but I've just been privy to some startling information that would blow the lid off PGMOL and the power brokers at the Premier League, if it became public. It involves a recording of a conversation between the match day referee and VAR official at a recent away match, a recording that is now in the hands of City.
It's my firm belief that City have compiled a dossier so incendiary, that the Premier League will have no choice but to totally exonerate the Club of any wrongdoing. If they don't, this is going nuclear. Either way, we hold all the cards and this explains why we're so bullish about the eventual outcome. The Premier League are on the back foot, and in my opinion, are currently lobbying the membership as to how best to quietly end the process. I have also been advised that at least one of the "Nasty 9" has had board level discussions with City, distancing themselves from the others in the cabal.
Pep's press conference tells us all we need to know. Watch it again, look at the anger and barely controllable rage in the mans eyes. His attitude wasn't based upon him being reassured about some poxy finances & bullshit charges, it was because he KNOWS exactly what is coming.
Sit back and enjoy the ride Blues.
most rival fans especially redtops call us cheats from the uefa case , saying we were found guilty cos they fined us 10m and they couldnt press further charges due to time barring , nothing will change that regardless of the future outcome , fuck emExactly.
It’s the reputational damage that’s a free hit here.
Why have they not taken the case to the police and HMRC? Because it’s a load of cobblers in the make believe bubble called football.I am at a loss here. IF the PL have such a strong case over such a long time why haven't they taken it to UEFA?
Whatever happens we’ll be called cheats for ever in the eyes of many even if we’re completely exonerated and get a grovelling apology.. so let’s just get the outcome we want and fuck ‘em allmost rival fans especially redtops call us cheats from the uefa case , saying we were found guilty cos they fined us 10m and they couldnt press further charges due to time barring , nothing will change that regardless of the future outcome , fuck em
I don’t read either. This is my one and only social media outlet. I do notice the difference over here though between Rag and Dipper fan bases.I've seen some very insightful posts on Red Cafe. Not so much on RAWK. Some of the United posters are knowledgeable about the areas that are important to them - Glazers, how their spending is affected by FFP etc. But they haven't had the same scrutiny we have had over FFP, so I find they don't have the depth of knowledge some of our guys are able to offer.