PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

We fans may want to see that but I don't think the club would do it. They might be the only friend we have!
Friends don’t do what they did if it’s true. They want to keep Vinnie contacts at the club in case they want us to loan them a player. They will not be a direct rival to us at any time. City will get next to nothing out of it in my opinion
 
I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.
I always suspected Walton's repeated appointments to Everton home fixtures and resulting performances were incredibly suspect. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen such bias before or since the 2010/11 game.

I find it hard to believe however, that City would have in their possession evidence with the potential to stop Liverpool winning the league and not use it.
 
I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.
Interesting. I assume the last bit is the hacking but I can't think of what he could have discovered that might have won us the league in 19/20.
 
I always suspected Walton's repeated appointments to Everton home fixtures and resulting performances were incredibly suspect. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen such bias before or since the 2010/11 game.

I find it hard to believe however, that City would have in their possession evidence with the potential to stop Liverpool winning the league and not use it.
They didn't have evidence. They were told in August 2019 that there was a fix in place and that involved Liverpool winning the league. He offered his help to counter that and they didn't take him up on it.
 
Add another charge

FA: "It's alleged that both clubs failed to ensure their players conducted themselves in an orderly fashion, with Arsenal's players surrounding the match official during the 56th minute, and #ManCity's doing so during the 42nd and 64th minutes..." [via
@FAspokesperson
]
1676650926593.png
 
Their investigation started in late 2018, and they’ve accused of us of not cooperating since then, so presumably that’s why they’ve chosen to charge us up until that point, and with non-compliance subsequently? If that makes sense? Could be completely wrong on that though!
Sounds right to me. Which suggests that, like UEFA, they've really only got the Der Spiegel emails as the basis of their charges. Anything beyond that would be classed as a 'fishing expedition'.
 
Can we not just point out all the times the Rags have done it without being charged?

You could, but it would be a complete lie.




3 times this season alone.
 
I see DAZN are trying to muscle in on PL tv rights, they’ve already snatched a few high profile boxers from Sly, but they’re more likely to rival BT for their package first…..I said midweek this is probably about Tv rights etc, it just feels like a big power struggle right at the top of the game
 
I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.
Cheers mate. Thanks for the info
 
I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.
Is this the incident which could have left certain Liverpool directors being led off in handcuffs?
 
I'm lost now. What did the club partly act on, but chose not to on others. Bullet points would help me please.
 
You could, but it would be a complete lie.




3 times this season alone.
I was talking about previous seasons. However you have alerted me to the fact that the PL must have changed tack this season and are following the UEFA example of how to increase their income.
 
I was talking about previous seasons. However you have alerted me to the fact that the PL must have changed tack this season and are following the UEFA example of how to increase their income.

Every club in the league gets 2 or 3 of these a season.

It's just not something anyone notices normally unless it their club.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top