PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Their investigation started in late 2018, and they’ve accused of us of not cooperating since then, so presumably that’s why they’ve chosen to charge us up until that point, and with non-compliance subsequently? If that makes sense? Could be completely wrong on that though!
The other thing is that the image rights payments from Fordham stopped then.
 
Seems unthinkable that the alleged stuff would be said on mic where they know people will hear it. Even Michael Oliver isn't that stupid. I'm sure it was posted on here in good faith but let's face it, it has to be bollocks.

Unthinkable until you consider that everyone walks around with a high definition recording device in their pocket.
 
You could, but it would be a complete lie.




3 times this season alone.

Don’t seem a lot that seeing they do it most there games
 
Was there not at some point previously a non match official in the var box, someone associated with PL who shouldn’t have been there. I may be wrong but it does suggest 3rd party involvement in var is possible.
Southampton at Home, when Foden unbelievably didn’t get a penalty that was 100% a penalty
 
I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.
They should have pushed it instead of trying to play nicely.

I also know for a fact that there is a member of staff at City who is on 1st name terms with pep and every player who knows that a Premier league ref is a Liverpool fan (so presumably it will have come up in conversation at some point).
 
Friends don’t do what they did if it’s true. They want to keep Vinnie contacts at the club in case they want us to loan them a player. They will not be a direct rival to us at any time. City will get next to nothing out of it in my opinion
Burnley have different owners now, there's nothing wrong with re-establishing good relations with the club at that level. Rebuffing them would be like blaming Sheikh Mansour for the failings of Peter Swales.
 
Southampton at Home, when Foden unbelievably didn’t get a penalty that was 100% a penalty
That was the ‘matchday commander’ who was outed by Halsey iirc, overruled the VAR officials despite having no right to do so
 
That was the ‘matchday commander’ who was outed by Halsey iirc, overruled the VAR officials despite having no right to do so
That article shows how bent it is , it’s an absolute disgrace tbh , City are generally that good though we don’t often need pens to win a game , how on earth did that Rashford goal not go to VAR ? Some proper shady shit going on 100%
 
Tbf he has been alluding to something for a while and posted this 10 days ago


View attachment 69490
Some of that stuff about Everton seems very fanciful to say the least
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top