Most annoying football cliche?

Whenever a team from Trafford isn’t playing:

‘When they played and lost against Manchester United …’
‘…Used to play for Manchester United …’
‘They have some way to go to beat the Manchester United record of…’
‘I watched Manchester United yesterday and they played that move far better…’
‘…is related to the Manchester United legend…’
‘…his play reminds me of the young Manchester United lad…’
Ad infinitum
 
What do they even mean by a six pointer ? Never understood it
When we win against Arsenal we will get three points to our tally, and at the same time assure they don't get any points.

So when playing a specific team the effect is similar to getting six points in one game (since by winning we at the same time prevent them from getting three points as well).
 
Pretty much anything to do with goalkeeping. "Shouldn't get beaten at your near post" and "should have done better" both spring to mind.

The latter, in particular, since it's said whenever a goalie gets their fingertips to a shit. In those cases they'd get less criticism if they made less of an effort to save it.

I agree, they would be doing much better if they used toilet paper instead.
 
Just means that it's a Very Important Match for both sides. Usually used when the two are direct rivals for the title.
But also used when both are fighting relegation, and one will leapfrog the other if they win. But it is only three points. I've checked. Our upcoming match with Arsenal at the Etihad will only gain either side a maximum of three points. Things can still happen after that…
One team gains 3 points. The other team loses 3 points.
 
Nope. The other team is as they were. They neither gain nor lose anything.
Otherwise every single game would be a six-pointer.
Ah yes but, if every game were a six pointer we would have got 196 points in the Centurion season.
Even better the season the dips got within a point - we would have finished with 194 points and the trampy bastard skip rats would’ve got………. 187!
 
Pundit Y says that Coach X got his tactics ‘spot on’. Pundit Y proceeds not to illustrate what said tactics were. Illustrating Pundit Y to be a know-nothing air-bag.

Likewise, Sant Josep ‘overthinking’ it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top