Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is obviously a clear media agenda against City success.

The ‘treble’ talk is but the latest in a long long line of vitriol and jingoism against the club:
‘How X can stop City’
‘Z promises Y will do all they can to stop City’
‘It won’t be a treble as good as United’s and here’s 99 reasons why’
Etc

Compare and contrast with the fawning love-in with last years prospect of Liverpool getting a quadruple:
‘How Liverpool can win CL’
‘What Liverpool need to do to overhaul City’
‘Will ex legend Gerrard help Aston Villa hand Liverpool the PL’

It’s stating the bleeding obvious, but have the UK media no shame?
Yer can't make much of a splash in the media if you have a conscience and get embroiled in such concepts as 'shame'. When it comes to reporting football the English media are shameless. Once upon a time they used to espouse the notion of fans getting behind English teams. What they meant was that they wanted everyone on the night to support the Rags 'n Dippers. This 'support English teams' clarion call has disappeared somewhat as it begs the question of why the RDAHMeedya are so clearly anti-City! But, fuck 'em, we roll, treble or no treble. Whoever wins what they won't have had the season we've had! And that's if we finish 'potless'!
 
Organically?

About ten years after they’d stacked the deck in their favour? Using the money that move had bestowed upon them to break transfer record after transfer record? To use the domestic income and glory that provided to guarantee qualification for a recalibrated European Cup, the revised finances for which helped further cement the gap between them and those their machinations had left behind?

There was fuck all ‘organic’ about united’s treble win in 1999. It was the culmination of a series of conscious commercial moves to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of a few clubs, of which united would be at the apex. It was as a result of united et al creating a landscape where they would take revenue away from other clubs in order to widen the gap between them. A decision to break a convention of wealth distribution in football that had lasted a century.

The fact that the team that won the treble had quite a few youth players is merely a sideshow to the main event.

And the irony is, which Herbert’s tiny mind will manifestly struggle to comprehend, is the City model that he so despairs of, arose from what United did in the late 80s and early 90s. The treble win in ’99 was a staging post in the journey to the club City are today.

People say that Pep wouldn’t have come to City if it wasn’t for all the money, and whilst there’s an undeniable truth in that, it’s equally correct to say Mansour wouldn’t have bought the club if united and their cohort hadn’t been such greedy cunts 30 years ago, making the opportunities for commercial revenue from English football so enticing.

The Cambridge Online Dictionary defines ‘organic‘ (inter alia) as follows:
happening or developing naturally over time, without being forced or planned by anyone

The cunts certainly didn’t plan for what happened to City; that seems pretty organic to me.
When I see the word organically in relation to the media darlings I always immediately think of something growing from a bag of shit
 
Just to let you know, saying "I watch women's football sometimes, so I can't be sexist" is the same as "I've got a mate who's black..."

There are plenty of crap pundits, both men and women, but there's absolutely no argument for excluding women's voices from the game entirely based on some subjective premise that their game is equivalent to "Conference level" football.

Personally I'd listen to someone like Emma Hayes or Rachel Brown Finnish over fucking Danny Murphy or Lee Dixon any day of the week.
You’re in the minority, hardly ever heard a decent female, Hayes is one of the worst.
 
Didn’t they also have the most expensive quartet of strikers in world football at the time?
And 9 of their finishing team were bought players, organic my arse.
The red-tinted everything about views of that final makes me sick, they were absolutely schooled by Bayern who had also hit the woodwork at least twice, and rags scrambled a couple of stuffy bagatelle goals in a desperate gung-ho last hurrah at the death.
As for the league, they won it with 79 points, drawing a third of their games, scoring 80 goals - hardly the stuff of legend!, I think this City team would destroy them. Yes, football has moved on, largely because of City!
 
I'm loving the fact this treble talk has well and truly got under the rags skin bigtime, none more than gobshite neville.

You watch how many times he mentions it when he's on tv, he's on double figures now and we're nowhere near it yet. The presenters don't help with their faux concern we might do it.

Love it, absolutely love it that we're on everyone's mind in the media and football world, can't stop laughing.

Deloony and nostrils harris don't know whether to stop, go, stick or twist.

Screenshot_20220201-121515_Photos.jpg
 



It's not what the treble would mean to me and you, it's all about what it means to the journalists and apparently it wouldn't be very good...

If we do win the treble we will do it with more points, more goals scored, less conceded, having put six past them and four past Liverpool. We will have beaten Arsenal to the title, Bayern, Real Madrid, and probably AC Milan. We will have won the first ever all-Manchester FA Cup Final. Our leading player will have scored more than 50 goals. Apparently this will not compare with United's huge league tally of 79 points. Whatever!
 
And 9 of their finishing team were bought players, organic my arse.
The red-tinted everything about views of that final makes me sick, they were absolutely schooled by Bayern who had also hit the woodwork at least twice, and rags scrambled a couple of stuffy bagatelle goals in a desperate gung-ho last hurrah at the death.
As for the league, they won it with 79 points, drawing a third of their games, scoring 80 goals - hardly the stuff of legend!, I think this City team would destroy them. Yes, football has moved on, largely because of City!

We saw what Pep did to Ferguson. Those CL finals were a slaughtering. Poor little United only had transfer records all over the pitch. And the self proclaimed best front three in the World.
 
Didn’t they also have the most expensive quartet of strikers in world football at the time?
Most of the United 1999 team was bought and included big transfer fees at the time for Keane, Sheringham, Cole, Yorke, Stam for starters. It is just a bloody myth that United didn't spend big. They shattered the transfer record every season. They also bought Irwin, Solskjaer, and Schmeichel. Google is a useful tool for exposing some of the dishonest hacks.
 
If we do win the treble we will do it with more points, more goals scored, less conceded, having put six past them and four past Liverpool. We will have beaten Arsenal to the title, Bayern, Real Madrid, and probably AC Milan. We will have won the first ever all-Manchester FA Cup Final. Our leading player will have scored more than 50 goals. Apparently this will not compare with United's huge league tally of 79 points. Whatever!
When you put it like that…
 
Most of the United 1999 team was bought and included big transfer fees at the time for Keane, Sheringham, Cole, Yorke, Stam for starters. It is just a bloody myth that United didn't spend big. They shattered the transfer record every season. They also bought Irwin, Solskjaer, and Schmeichel. Google is a useful tool for exposing some of the dishonest hacks.

They took Newcastle’s best striker off them in Andy Cole and also paired him up with the very prolific Dwight Yorke taken from Aston Villa. When these two hit a brick wall in the final they could then send on Teddy Sheringham (ex Spurs). Utter revisionism from the raggy mouth piece.
 
Organically?

About ten years after they’d stacked the deck in their favour? Using the money that move had bestowed upon them to break transfer record after transfer record? To use the domestic income and glory that provided to guarantee qualification for a recalibrated European Cup, the revised finances for which helped further cement the gap between them and those their machinations had left behind?

There was fuck all ‘organic’ about united’s treble win in 1999. It was the culmination of a series of conscious commercial moves to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of a few clubs, of which united would be at the apex. It was as a result of united et al creating a landscape where they would take revenue away from other clubs in order to widen the gap between them. A decision to break a convention of wealth distribution in football that had lasted a century.

The fact that the team that won the treble had quite a few youth players is merely a sideshow to the main event.

And the irony is, which Herbert’s tiny mind will manifestly struggle to comprehend, is the City model that he so despairs of, arose from what United did in the late 80s and early 90s. The treble win in ’99 was a staging post in the journey to the club City are today.

People say that Pep wouldn’t have come to City if it wasn’t for all the money, and whilst there’s an undeniable truth in that, it’s equally correct to say Mansour wouldn’t have bought the club if united and their cohort hadn’t been such greedy cunts 30 years ago, making the opportunities for commercial revenue from English football so enticing.

The Cambridge Online Dictionary defines ‘organic‘ (inter alia) as follows:
happening or developing naturally over time, without being forced or planned by anyone


The cunts certainly didn’t plan for what happened to City; that seems pretty organic to me.
Bizarre that paid hands deploy and mis-use the term across the board without challenge...........
 
Organically?

About ten years after they’d stacked the deck in their favour? Using the money that move had bestowed upon them to break transfer record after transfer record? To use the domestic income and glory that provided to guarantee qualification for a recalibrated European Cup, the revised finances for which helped further cement the gap between them and those their machinations had left behind?

There was fuck all ‘organic’ about united’s treble win in 1999. It was the culmination of a series of conscious commercial moves to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of a few clubs, of which united would be at the apex. It was as a result of united et al creating a landscape where they would take revenue away from other clubs in order to widen the gap between them. A decision to break a convention of wealth distribution in football that had lasted a century.

The fact that the team that won the treble had quite a few youth players is merely a sideshow to the main event.

And the irony is, which Herbert’s tiny mind will manifestly struggle to comprehend, is the City model that he so despairs of, arose from what United did in the late 80s and early 90s. The treble win in ’99 was a staging post in the journey to the club City are today.

People say that Pep wouldn’t have come to City if it wasn’t for all the money, and whilst there’s an undeniable truth in that, it’s equally correct to say Mansour wouldn’t have bought the club if united and their cohort hadn’t been such greedy cunts 30 years ago, making the opportunities for commercial revenue from English football so enticing.

The Cambridge Online Dictionary defines ‘organic‘ (inter alia) as follows:
happening or developing naturally over time, without being forced or planned by anyone

The cunts certainly didn’t plan for what happened to City; that seems pretty organic to me.
Oh and great post by the way..........
 
It’s the old “ build em up to knock em down” routine
They’ve being doing it since the day we we taken over.
Nothing will ever change with the media
Most of them don’t even believe what they write but it generates more income to piggyback the old guard.
It’s always about the money which is ironic all things considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top