PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Millennium said:
I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
Click to expand...
You know what you will get with Jordan. That's the reason I don't listen to him. Do yourself a favour and switch to Classic FM when he and his full of his own self importance prick sidekick are on.
 
The knives are out, every news outlet has us guilty as charged, we're cheats, state owned, sports washing liars who've shamed the Premier league on a global scale.

The only thing in the whole shit show that pisses me off is ' we accepted the pinch'. We should've gone balls deep and on the attack at that time.
 
Millennium said:
I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
Click to expand...
No because that would not aid revenue. It’s no secret. Discuss the topic that will get the audience to call in. Arguing for and against city pays either way. He can even change his stance midway through a program to garner more idiots to call in. City must be guilty is an easy bite.

Partisan media only exists if it brings in revenue. It is what it is. Fact or truth don’t come into it.

He is glad you are upset and annoyed.
 
M18CTID said:
I'm not totally sure about that but Pep mentioned Levy by name during THAT presser!
Click to expand...
M18CTID said:
I'm not totally sure about that but Pep mentioned Levy by name during THAT presser!
Click to expand...
Ducado said:
According to sources he was the main mover behind it all, perhaps that's why it been handled so badly
Click to expand...

Ahh thanks, I remember him mentioning Spurs in the presser but wasn't aware Levy pushed for it to move forward.

Fool needs to deal with his own issues
 
If I was loaded, the last thing I'd be doing is making a career as a shill on talkshite.

What a weirdo.
 
SilverFox2 said:
I thought our owner Sheikh M bailed out Barclay's Bank with a multi billion pound loan that got repaid with plenty of interest.
Click to expand...
He did.
It could have been RBS instead of Barclays.
Dippers were definitely saved from administration by a loan from a bank owned by the taxpayer.
 
Millennium said:
I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
Click to expand...
Nobody ever asks the prick what proof has he got to be on this crusade other than phone-in or media air time to justify his sad existence to say that City is guilty. Is he privileged to information that others are not? SJIAC
 
All this faux outrage is completely off my radar and I'm only aware of it when I visit this site.
I deleted Twitter last year, don't look at any of those Fan Boy or banter pages on Arsebook, don't read papers or click on links to their articles & I've never and never will listen to Talk Shite or 5 Live.
 
staffsblue said:
All this faux outrage is completely off my radar and I'm only aware of it when I visit this site.
I deleted Twitter last year, don't look at any of those Fan Boy or banter pages on Arsebook, don't read papers or click on links to their articles & I've never and never will listen to Talk Shite or 5 Live.
Click to expand...
You sound like a pretty chilled guy with lots of time on his hands.
 
journolud said:
You know what you will get with Jordan. That's the reason I don't listen to him. Do yourself a favour and switch to Classic FM when he and his full of his own self importance prick sidekick are on.
Click to expand...

Apparently we should "watch the audio", that was his proclamation today.

Nothing worse than someone who thinks he's the smartest man in the room.
 
Millennium said:
I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
Click to expand...
To be fair to him,he's hardly on his own, is he? Most of the media has us hung, drawn and quartered. And even if (sorry, when!) we're cleared, it'll be "no smoke without fire", or "they've paid off the investigators". We cant/won't be allowed to win, even if we win!
 
Wouldn't surprise me if that bald prick levy has been feeding that wankstain Jordan snippets of what's going on,I believe they are very matey...pair of twats....
 
It's best just to call in and give Jordan back what he dishes out. He bankrupted Palace.

Lots of people have thrown that his way and he hates it. He's very interested in facts and context when it comes to his own financial dealings.
 
I'm still in shock at Noel Gallagher telling Simon Jordan that he has respect on the terraces, certainly from city fans.

I had to listen back 4 or 5 times to make sure that was what I heard.

I love Noel and his humour and how he delivers his points but this is an absolute no no, sorry Noel but you are talking out your arse about that wobbling waspberry, he deserves no respect at all.
 
Ghandi's Flip Flops said:
The 800-900k per week figure originated from an article (possibly Mike Keegan) where a supposed number of agents had speculated what Haaland could earn per week based on win/goal bonuses, trophy and award bonuses, image rights & deals etc etc etc, even probably including winning the Grand National.
The red shirt masses lapped it up, and this figure soon became enshrined as what his basic weekly salary was.
Whereas most agree his basic is circa 300-400k per week
Click to expand...
Caught a bit of Danny Murphy on Talkshite this morning. The latest (black funnily enough) player who will be ruined because he's paid too much is Saka, because he signed a new deal. Murphy said he never believes the numbers in the media (missing the point he's now part of it) as when he was playing, he'd see things about what people were supposedly earning and would know it was nowhere near that. He said Saka's reported salary will be if he wins every cup and award.

It was weird to hear a voice of reason and obviously he was ignored because rich (black) footballers are the main problem in the game.
 
abu13 said:
I keep on hearing that we pay Haaland £835k a week more than double what anyone else was prepared to pay, do people seriously believe this?

I know he is a top class player but really.

Lets assume that Madrid offered him £400k a week, he is a known City fan who had the chance to play for us, not only that but also to play under Pep and with a genuine chance of clearing up a serious amount of silverware over the next 5 years. With this in mind do people really think that we topped it up by another £435k on top just to make sure we got him.

And that's before we talk about the supposed £50 million signing on fee split between him and Alfie.

The same people then claim he will walk away from this to go and play for Madrid in a couple of years, almost like they can't decide which bullshit to believe.
Click to expand...
The Haaland deal shows exactly the made up crap spouted by the media and the gullible idiots of other fans who read and believe such crap posted then re post it

We sold Torres in January for 55 million which is never mentioned, and bought Haaland for 51 Million.
All of a sudden it was like we paid the 1st ever agent fee in football, oh no said everyone bar City fans.
, if you add this and that and agent fees we paid around 200 million not 51 for him.
As usual his wages over his contract was added to the headlines, as if again any media "journalist" knows what we pay him.
Then a story came out that if we win everything and he hits all his bonuses, again by people who would not have any knowledge of a contract between him and City the laughable 900k a week was born.
And thats what the idiots think we pay him.
Just have to look at Rags for salaries like that with PR7 abd the likes or Salah 400k a week which of course was never mentioned or how much his new contract was worth over the contract extension.

As others have said, if found not guilty i hope the club hires investigators and gets some dirt on the hatefull 8/9.
Start with the Bebe Transfer which stank, why did the PL quietly drops some of its FFP rules over wage increases at a time Rags had a lot of contract renewals coming up and spending heavily in the market as a start
 
manimanc said:
I'm still in shock at Noel Gallagher telling Simon Jordan that he has respect on the terraces, certainly from city fans.

I had to listen back 4 or 5 times to make sure that was what I heard.

I love Noel and his humour and how he delivers his points but this is an absolute no no, sorry Noel but you are talking out your arse about that wobbling waspberry, he deserves no respect at all.
Click to expand...
Has he fuck. If he came on the terraces he'd be hung from a
stanchion and rabbit punched in his smug mush.
 
manimanc said:
I'm still in shock at Noel Gallagher telling Simon Jordan that he has respect on the terraces, certainly from city fans.

I had to listen back 4 or 5 times to make sure that was what I heard.

I love Noel and his humour and how he delivers his points but this is an absolute no no, sorry Noel but you are talking out your arse about that wobbling waspberry, he deserves no respect at all.
Click to expand...

Noel also failed in correcting him on the false statement he made saying we were fined for failing FFP which we got reduced at CAS. We were fined for not cooperating with an investigation we thought was skewed against us.

Nothing to do with FFP which we were cleared on.

Thought Noel would have been a bit more aware of things.
 
argyle said:
Noel also failed in correcting him on the false statement he made saying we were fined for failing FFP which we got reduced at CAS. We were fined for not cooperating with an investigation we thought was skewed against us.

Nothing to do with FFP which we were cleared on.

Thought Noel would have been a bit more aware of things.
Click to expand...

I think Jordan was being deliberately disingenuous by trying to frame it in such a way that the average talkshite listener would be able to understand. Either that or he's not quite as intelligent as he thinks he is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top