The Harry and Meghan fuss

[TinFoilHat]

watching SKY News paper and Gove's ex - forget her name - saying that Harry has to prove stuff beyond any doubt - usual Tory grifter lies probably worried about her grifter column job too coz she is facing it terms of a criminal case not a civil case which is what it is and Harry faces a much lower bar - as each day passes the r/w grifters become more and more concerned for their earning futures

I wish they'd give us a warning before Sarah Vine is due to appear.

Her politics and views reflect in her face.

 

[bluethrunthru]

Vine hosts some vile people doesn't he?

 

[Trickyblues]

Vine hosts some vile people doesn't he?

And never calls them out.

Caroline Flack’s mum told him a thing or 2 this morning on his show.

 

[bluethrunthru]

 

[Kirkstall Blue]

Can the judge call Morgan in ? I would pay to watch him squirm, Harry only needs to prove one of his cases

 

[bigstanhibbert]

Can the judge call Morgan in ? I would pay to watch him squirm, Harry only needs to prove one of his cases

Not sure, but hopefully he can, but pretty sure both defence and plaintiff need to provide witnesses and evidence in advance to the case.

Did you see his very short response to his doorstep question this morning, seemed very nervous

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Vine hosts some vile people doesn't he?

Why does Tina Knight give off the impression as the kind of person who runs swinging parties?

 

[bluethrunthru]

Why does Tina Knight give off the impression as the kind of person who runs swinging parties?

Don't - I nearly brought my tea up at that thought lol

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Don't - I nearly brought my tea up at that thought lol

A large detached house in a semi-rural location, open house, plenty of pimms, and an outdoor swimming pool that isn't just filled with chlorinated water.

There's a few on here that would pay for an invite to that party.

 

[bluethrunthru]

sums up the media hate - its about race but they know they can't say the quiet bit out loud

 

[bluethrunthru]

Why does Tina Knight give off the impression as the kind of person who runs swinging parties?

deffo a strong Cynthia Payne / luncheon vouchers vibe

 

[Trickyblues]

sums up the media hate - its about race but they know they can't say the quiet bit out loud

It’s not the first time this woman has said something similar. And yet this tv station somehow allows it.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

It’s not the first time this woman has said something similar. And yet this tv station somehow allows it.

Allows it? They probably pay her to push that opinion (it might not even be her real opinion, she might just be playing the part for the television audience) so they have the one-end-of-the-argument versus the other-end-of-the-argument all the time to create more arguments and gets people talking about the show and it trending online.

‘Ooh look at what they’re arguing about’…

Same as talkSPORT, same as everything in the media these days. One extreme opposed to the other all the time for dramatic effect.

Ever notice how nobody is ever indifferent to anything in the media? There’s never just people agreeing with each other or saying ‘I can’t say I’m arsed about this really’. It’s always people pushing outlandish views for arguments.

 

[Trickyblues]

Allows it? They probably pay her to push that opinion (it might not even be her real opinion, she might just be playing the part for the television audience) so they have the one end of the argument versus the other end of the argument all the time to create more arguments and gets people talking about the show and it trending online.

‘Ooh look at what they’re arguing about’…

Same as talkSPORT, same as everything in the media these days. One extreme opposed to the other all the time for dramatic effect.

But why do these people need to be talking about Meghan in the first place when they haven’t heard her speak for 7 months?

Meanwhile tax payer funded Charles is having another coronation and there is silence. Tax payer funded Kate and Williams marriage is falling apart and there is silence. They really ought to talk about the royals they so desperately “love” and pay for.

 

[r.soleofsalford]

deffo a strong Cynthia Payne / luncheon vouchers vibe

At least we know what you was up to in the 70`s and 80`s

 

[Deleted member 77198]

But why do these people need to be talking about Meghan in the first place when they haven’t heard her speak for 7 months?

Meanwhile tax payer funded Charles is having another coronation and there is silence. Tax payer funded Kate and Williams marriage is falling apart and there is silence. They really ought to talk about the royals they so desperately “love” and pay for.

They aren’t bothered about what (the actual content and substance) they talk about, all they’re bothered about is what will get the biggest reaction. It doesn’t matter what Markle has or hasn’t said or done or how long it’s been; the media know talking about her will get a big reaction so they’ll just shove her in every now and again… maybe viewing figures have been a bit lower of late so they’ll have sat down in a meeting and said, ‘what gets everyone talking and arguing?’… ‘Markle! We’ll crowbar her in today, then by Friday we might have had more viewers than last week’.

And look, it works.

They want you to say exactly what you’ve said in your post and probably to Tweet about it, hastagging the Vine Show, because it’s stirred an argument in you and it would create interest around the show.

 

[Trickyblues]

They aren’t bothered about what (the actual content and substance) they talk about, all they’re bothered about is what will get the biggest reaction. It doesn’t matter what Markle has or hasn’t said or done or how long it’s been; the media know talking about her will get a big reaction so they’ll just shove her in every now and again… maybe viewing figures have been a bit lower of late so they’ll have sat down in a meeting and said, ‘what gets everyone talking and arguing?’… ‘Markle! We’ll crowbar her in today, then by Friday we might have had more viewers than last week’.

And look, it works.

They want you to say exactly what you’ve said in your post and probably to Tweet about it, hastagging the Vine Show, because it’s stirred an argument in you and it would create interest around the show.

A truly pathetic country. Distracting from real issues by talking about Meghan Markle. Also it’s not “now and again” it’s constant. People are actually just sick of it and see through the propaganda now. What a sorry state of a country.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

A truly pathetic country. Distracting from real issues by talking about Meghan Markle. Also it’s not “now and again” it’s constant. People are actually just sick of it and see through the propaganda now. What a sorry state of a country.

The country is fine. Most people are fine. I don’t know a single mate, family member or colleague who has an opinion either way about Megan Markle. And she never comes up on conversation, ever. And that will go for most people across the country.

But there will always be someone who’ll bite and that’s what these shows operate for, all the Twitter dribblers who get all worked up at both ends of the scale.

Just stay away from watching things like Jeremy Vine, and same goes for listening to talkSPORT and reading The Guardian when it comes to City.

 

[Trickyblues]

The country is fine. Most people are fine. I don’t know a single mate, family member or colleague who has an opinion either way about Megan Markle. And she never comes up on conversation, ever. And that will go for most people across the country.

But there will always be someone who’ll bite and that’s what these shows operate for, all the Twitter dribblers who get all worked up at both ends of the scale.

Just stay away from watching things like Jeremy Vine, and same goes for listening to talkSPORT and reading The Guardian when it comes to City.

Which bit?

 

[blueinsa]

Great bump lol

Someone was bored.