Harry Kane

bluealf said:
If it was a problem for him surely he wouldn't keep signing long deals at Spurs, he could have ran his contract down anytime he wanted over the last 10 years
It seems to me it bothers other people way more that Harry Kane has won nothing, than Harry Kane himself.

I am sure he will take the plaudits for being the PLs highest goal scorer alongside being his country's record goal scorer.

I'm sure it will still be a good take to tell his grandkids from the front seat of his supercar or chair in his massive house with cinema and pool.

What a fucking failure lol

And I don't even like him btw and didn't want him at City.
Click to expand...
I think he signed a massive contract tye summer that they got to the Champions League Final. He obviously thought they were going places under Pochettino.

They started the season off poorly and Pochettino got the chop. That was the start of the slippery slope for Tottenham.

I don't like him either, When we were linked two summers ago I was delighted we didn't get the ****.
 
Keeper! said:
But in Mahrez's case he eventually got his move and I am not sure it affected any bad feelings towards him from their fan base.
Click to expand...

He did. Because we paid the asking price. A club would need to do that for Kane, on top of him kicking up a fuss.
 
If Kane going to stay at spurs then be on a free next season we should be top of that pile for him! He can't be going to Liverpool arsenal Chelsea the rags
 
Last edited:
He should have done a ronaldo and contacted that **** Morgan lol

Seriously though any player thinking about going to spuds are going to see what a **** levy is if they maybe have any thoughts of leaving further down the line to a better club.
Levy is a mug and has no confidence they can replace Kane so has turned down millions and damaged the clubs reputation For future players.
As good as Kane is I would be fuming if I supported spurs.
 
Coatigan said:
Just spotted the edit. Don't know enough about that one but I have heard of it, so perhaps that is an actual legal route should he hypothetically really want out.

I broadly agree with you btw, Spurs aren't holding him hostage, he is there because he accepts being there. I just don't entirely agree with some of the claims thatnif he wanted out, he'd just have left. It is an uncomfortable stand-off, where both sides seem comfortable with a status quo.
Click to expand...
It’s the Webster ruling that clubs have a “gentleman’s agreement” not to use.

So far, it’s worked, but at some point a club will use it and it might become more commonplace after that.
 
You could argue all that about Levy, reckless, stubborn, spiteful, daft even.

But I won't lie, I love to see it happening to Bayern, the entitled pricks.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s the Webster ruling that clubs have a “gentleman’s agreement” not to use.

So far, it’s worked, but at some point a club will use it and it might become more commonplace after that.
Click to expand...

It would have to be either a really extreme stand-off, or a totally minor one, to be used imo.

In Kane's case, he is on a big contract, and it is a significant amount to buy out. Which Bayern would then have to cover. It leaves all 3 parties looking like dicks. And that's before you bring his long term standing at Spurs into it.
 
levy takes being the bad guy as it means kane doesnt look like the unambitious coward that he is and gets to remain englands golden boy in his comfort zone while letting someone else take the flack for it
 
Coatigan said:
It would have to be either a really extreme stand-off, or a totally minor one, to be used imo.

In Kane's case, he is on a big contract, and it is a significant amount to buy out. Which Bayern would then have to cover. It leaves all 3 parties looking like dicks. And that's before you bring his long term standing at Spurs into it.
Click to expand...
I guess if he’s on £250k a week, that the buying club would be prepared to pay the £13m necessary to buy him out.

Its the optics, as you suggest, that would probably prevent them actually carrying it out, although Bayern don’t seem to be shy in stealing other German clubs’ players…
 
mancboy said:
i think spurs lawyers are a little tied up at the mo
Click to expand...

No, nothing to do with the club, totally separate entities. What their owners do or don't do in no way reflects on the club nor can it be used to in any way link to their reputation as a club. Sky Sports told us so.
 
Coatigan said:
No, nothing to do with the club, totally separate entities. What their owners do or don't do in no way reflects on the club nor can it be used to in any way link to their reputation as a club. Sky Sports told us so.
Click to expand...
well if sky sports said it then it must be true, i stand corrected
 
roach3 said:
He should have done a ronaldo and contacted that **** Morgan lol

Seriously though any player thinking about going to spuds are going to see what a **** levy is if they maybe have any thoughts of leaving further down the line to a better club.
Levy is a mug and has no confidence they can replace Kane so has turned down millions and damaged the clubs reputation For future players.
As good as Kane is I would be fuming if I supported spurs.
Click to expand...

They say no player or manager is bigger than the club he plays for ? But in Spur's case, Kane is Spurs in a nutshell
Without Kane Spurs and Levy knows they would be midtable, Levy has a major problem because he's built Spurs around Kane and can not lose him even to Munich, Kane Knows a move would finish Spurs as a top club and Levy and the fans would blame him for leaving

Levy should have taken Manchester City's big money, around £170million with add-ons and built a new team,
Yes, it would have taken time with no guarantees, but Spurs are falling behind every season Kane stays,

They are not going to get £100million with only a year left on his contract unless United come knocking
But they have signed a striker and only selling players would free up some room for Kane, but their new boy would not be happy knowing Kane would start every week,

Like I said only Manchester City could do a deal for Kane with a player or 2 going there and City make a money offer
But not anywhere near £100million
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top