United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
horlock_was_super said:
They are still bankable for all media outlets.
For years they were pushed down every other teams throat week in week out.
How great they are, they are the yardstick, they are what every schoolboy wanted to be and on and on it went.
We are now seeing the flip side - they are fucking shit and although the media are hurting - the scum are still able to pull the clicks/subscriptions in unabated.

Fans of other clubs who have suffered at their grubby hands in the past during their glory days (YUK!) are now taking great delight in seeing them as just another also ran - the mighty have fallen it seems and in that great British tradition we take comfort in what goes around comes around.

We have never been a gobshite fan base and hopefully never will be. We all accept that sooner or later we'll end up back in the pack and I doubt if/when this happens any perceived decline in our fortunes will be looked upon with as much morbid fascination/delight as that bunch of rat infested, fuckpig, cheating, misogynistic, deluded fuckwit scumbags are now subjected too.
The glory hunting plastic twats were right all along then maybe after all, we are all obsessed with them because right now I am taking great delight in watching the rest of the footballing world finally cottoning on to what we have known for years.

They have succeeded through winning by any means necessary - bullying, cheating, spending more than anyone else and having all forms of football officialdom in this country firmly at their beck and call.

I hope that the piss stained, shitty pants gpc lives for many years to come and watches as his corrupt fucking creation falls slowly and painfully apart before his bloodshot eyes.
Noisy neighbours? We've knocked the party wall down, had a massive dump in your front room and evicted you lock stock and barrel you booze addled cnut!

Chris Sutton is a cnut but, when he sticks his head above the parapet and calls it for what it is then maybe, just maybe the weight of public opinion might start a sea change towards the scum. Sadly I won't be holding my breath.
Long live UMS.

CTID.
As you w3r3 Blu3s.
Click to expand...



IZhabE.gif
 
KentBlue said:
Good luck to Forest, but I think it will fall on deliberately deaf ears.
Click to expand...
The narrative started on Saturday. MOTD managed to get an ex pro (Ashley Williams) to say it was the correct decision, without allowing any opposing views to be aired. Dean came later saying it was the correct decision, and suddenly it isn't as universally condemned as it otherwise would have been.

We see it all the time, and this is the pattern:

1. Initial decision immediately in favour of United.
2. VAR checks but there wasn't enough in it to recommend a review or overturn the decision.
3. Original decision stands.

For most other clubs, the pattern is slightly different:

1. Initial decision is against the interest of non-favoured team.
2. VAR checks but there wasn't enough in it to recommend a review or overturn the decision. On rare occasions, for really obvious mistakes, a review is called for.
3. Original decision stands.

Thus the majority of controversial calls go in United's favour and against other teams. I'm even starting to include Liverpool as a non-favoured team.

Pundits and journalists are really useless. In the Rashford penalty question, their starting point is entirely wrong - "Was there contact?" If the answer is yes, then they conclude without further question, that a penalty was the correct decision.

They should be saying: "Mike Riley said at the start of the 21-22 season that referees will ask themselves whether the player used contact to try and win a foul penalty, and it isn't sufficient just to say: ‘Yes, there’s contact.’ In addition to this, the amendments in the 23-24 Laws of the Game says that referees have been told to apply a higher threshold when considering contact between players to allow the game to flow better without so many free-kicks. Have these requirements been correctly applied in this situation?"

Attwell, other referees, and VARs are not applying their own regulations to United. They are not being held accountable for it, and neither is PGMOL.
 
Stoned Rose said:
Rags now buying that twat Hjoberg.

Sky trying their best to spin the rags buying some **** who isn’t good enough for Spurs as some kind of masterstroke.
Click to expand...
Arguably their best player last season not called Kane. He wants to leave that’s why he’s not featuring.
 
Ardnaree said:
Look at the ref's view of this shot at goal and handball in the box. No penalty awarded.
View attachment 91838
View attachment 91839

How is that any different from the penalty awarded to City on Sunday? Which struck John Egan as he was sliding in to block a cross into the box.

Is it corrupt? Or just inconsistent refereeing? Spineless officiating from VAR?

A team can now time waste throughout the game. Then on 90 mins throw on all their fresh legs because the ref is going to add 15 mins on. So they have quarter of an hour to throw the kitchen sink at tired legs that have been giving everything for a full game. How is that penalising the time wasting? Who benefits the time being added on now?
Click to expand...
Ooh well done you. You've gone to great lengths to find and illustrate ONE single, solitary example of where inconsistent officiating actually didn't benefit your scummy club.
 
Paladin said:
Evidence to support this? How do you know he doesn't want to leave because he's not featuring?
Click to expand...
He wanted to go to Atleti earlier this summer and play in the CL. Reported in England and Spain. Spurs are open to selling as he has two years left on his deal.

Though Daniel Levy is a pain to deal with so wouldn’t say this is likely.
 
Falcao said:
Arguably their best player last season not called Kane. He wants to leave that’s why he’s not featuring.
Click to expand...
It's a strange one with him. He is good but I can't work out why postecoglu doesn't use him.

I got the impression he wanted to get out of the circus that was spurs... so I'm not sure he will want to jump back into the fire with utd.
 
Falcao said:
He wanted to go to Atleti earlier this summer and play in the CL. Reported in England and Spain. Spurs are open to selling as he has two years left on his deal.

Though Daniel Levy is a pain to deal with so wouldn’t say this is likely.
Click to expand...

Yes but rag management are so fucking useless that Levy is probably rubbing his hands at the thought of offloading .

Anyway it's not everybody that gets a chance to buy yet another " best midfielder in the world " to play alongside Mount.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top