Well they made a correct decision for once. Eventually!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR Discussion Thread - 2023/24 | PL clubs to vote on whether to scrap VAR (pg413)
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,440
If that had been given against us by VAR this thread would have had 70 more pages added to it.Well they made a correct decision for once. Eventually!!
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 29,994
Who knew that whether a player can get to the ball or not is a factor in a VAR penalty decision?
Perhaps it's on the "Reasons why you don't give a pen against Utd"
(The Haaland non decision in the 2nd half and part of the check process for the Rodri Pen.)
Perhaps it's on the "Reasons why you don't give a pen against Utd"
(The Haaland non decision in the 2nd half and part of the check process for the Rodri Pen.)
VAR has ruined football apparently
It has.
Laughable seeing you and the other bloke straight into this thread when we get a decision in our favour.
Where have you been for the rest of this week and the usual VAR bullshit in matches?
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
Once again Gary has been allowed to get into everyone's homes and heads.
Just as he did with "tactical" fouling, he has added a prefix and the masses and media have bought it hook line and sinker! This time it's "soft" - when really it should be "nailed on". Not one person on the planet thinks it wasn't a penalty according to the rules of the game.
But yep, don't forget to add "soft", because Gary says so.
Just as he did with "tactical" fouling, he has added a prefix and the masses and media have bought it hook line and sinker! This time it's "soft" - when really it should be "nailed on". Not one person on the planet thinks it wasn't a penalty according to the rules of the game.
But yep, don't forget to add "soft", because Gary says so.
Last edited:
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
? Why ? - it's a pen, is a pen, is a pen!If that had been given against us by VAR this thread would have had 70 more pages added to it.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40,573
It has.
Laughable seeing you and the other bloke straight into this thread when we get a decision in our favour.
Where have you been for the rest of this week and the usual VAR bullshit in matches?
How do you define ruining football ?
attendances and global viewing figures are continuing to increase. how has VAR ruined football ?
I wont jump in every time officials get a wrong decision, because it will always happen - I've never argued VAR will get everything totally right. I've always said we have a system that can give refs a second chance of looking and a system that can tweak improvements year on year, we never had that with the old way of officiating.
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Let's be honest ...Var is crap..just because WE got a decision doesn't alter that.VAR has ruined football apparently
Maybe you should be more concerned about losing to Everton
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
How about it's ruining the enjoyment of match going fans..no fucker who sits near me wants VarHow do you define ruining football ?
attendances and global viewing figures are continuing to increase. how has VAR ruined football ?
I wont jump in every time officials get a wrong decision, because it will always happen - I've never argued VAR will get everything totally right. I've always said we have a system that can give refs a second chance of looking and a system that can tweak improvements year on year, we never had that with the old way of officiating.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40,573
Let's be honest ...Var is crap..just because WE got a decision doesn't alter that.
Maybe you should be more concerned about losing to Everton
It' not great.
But neither was officials allowing clear offside goals to stand, clear dives in the box being given as penalties, red card challenges unseen etc etc.
No form of officiating will please. but having tech help can at least improve the chances of the correct outcome.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40,573
How about it's ruining the enjoyment of match going fans..no fucker who sits near me wants Var
they will if we were to scrap it and you see Mo Salah dive with zero contact against you and Liverpool get awarded a penalty. for example.
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 25,068
They still get awarded it with it anywaythey will if we were to scrap it and you see Mo Salah dive with zero contact against you and Liverpool get awarded a penalty. for example.
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Mate you love Var..most fans I know hate it..they will if we were to scrap it and you see Mo Salah dive with zero contact against you and Liverpool get awarded a penalty. for example.
We will just have to disagree
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,560
Nowhere as this isn’t a thread for debate. It’s a thread for you to call everything bullshit and the agenda is large, real and corrupt.It has.
Laughable seeing you and the other bloke straight into this thread when we get a decision in our favour.
Where have you been for the rest of this week and the usual VAR bullshit in matches?
The rhetoric has been turned down though since “the other bloke” had a tantrum and took his ball home.
Its a pen Neville (begrudgingly), Keane, Danny Murphy, Given, etc all said it was. I’ts the type of decision thats not given enough granted but its a clear penalty!!If that had been given against us by VAR this thread would have had 70 more pages added to it.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
wait till dermott/webb has his sayOnce again Gary has been allowed to get into everyone's homes and heads.
Just as he did with "tactical" fouling, he has added a prefix and the masses and media have bought it hook line and sinker! This time it's "soft" - when really it should be "nailed on". Not one person on the planet thinks it wasn't a penalty according to the rules of the game.
But yep, don't forget to add "soft", because Gary says so.
Funny they kept saying it was soft pen but never shown the Haaland gbh he got grabbed twice and pulled back! Now Oliver had the referee look at the Rodri one in the first half why not the Haaland one? Is it because we already had a pen!? Tells me Oliver is not using var and rules right it's him thinking I can't give another one which is bad officiating in var
jimharri
Moderator
The problem is, a lot of the time nothing is given for that offence, not that what Hojlund did wasn't a foul. Which is what a lot of the whinging has been about. And I can see their point, to be honest. You watch any corner, moreso the defenders (yes, including ours); it's like a WWE tribute act, with all the grappling and holding going on. If the PL clamped down HARD on it, you'd have 3 or 4 penalties (minimum) a match. Are the authorities prepared to accept that? As for Rodri's role in it; did he "embellish" the contact? Of course he did. I remember an incident with Phil a few seasons back (against Southampton, maybe?) where he rounded the keeper who caught him on the ankle and brought him down. Phil got back up and attempted to score, but the angle had become too tight, and he missed. Did we get the penalty? No. The moral being, if you don't go down, you don't get the penalty.Its a pen Neville (begrudgingly), Keane, Danny Murphy, Given, etc all said it was. I’ts the type of decision thats not given enough granted but its a clear penalty!!
Nowhere as this isn’t a thread for debate. It’s a thread for you to call everything bullshit and the agenda is large, real and corrupt.
The rhetoric has been turned down though since “the other bloke” had a tantrum and took his ball home.
I wasn’t fucking talking to you.
Boring fucker.
Take it to PM if you feel the need to chat shit to me constantly.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,560
No one put you in charge. You post something on here and people can respond to that.I wasn’t fucking talking to you.
Boring fucker.
Take it to PM if you feel the need to chat shit to me constantly.
I’m not responding to your as hominem nonsense.
I’d rather stick pins in my eyes than PM you, but thanks for the offer.