Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s exactly what myself and another poster just said.

You can’t tell me that if we hadn’t got taken over, but Newcastle had and has all what we’ve had since then, that there wouldn’t be Blues calling them cheating cunts. Of course there would. Rational thinking goes out the window.
To be honest with you Langley, no I wouldn't.

If Newcastle were taken over in 2008 by Sheikh Mansour and they were enjoying the success we're currently enjoying I'd be right behind them.

Why? Because I fucking hate the rags more than you'll ever know. My mantra has always been "anyone but the scum"
 
I suspect the likes of Carragher and Neville won’t be happy until the threshold on these votes is 2-18, so that United and Liverpool can shape the league exactly how they want it.
Far too much power has been given to Liverpool and united. Wrestling it back to some sort of level playing field is going to be tough.

The two clubs mentioned control the league. It’s that simple. Now spit wants to name and shame clubs for not bending over. His public platform is pathetic and damaging the game.
 
To be honest with you Langley, no I wouldn't.

If Newcastle were taken over in 2008 by Sheikh Mansour and they were enjoying the success we're currently enjoying I'd be right behind them.

Why? Because I fucking hate the rags more than you'll ever know. My mantra has always been "anyone but the scum"
There would be many, though. That’s how football fandom works.

But behind closed doors those saying such things would know deep down it isn’t cheating, and would wish their club had the same.
 
IMG_2025.jpeg

Herbert lying again, the Etihad deal is deemed fair market value by Uefa. City get £17.5 million a year more than Arsenal for their similar deal with Emirates. This is City who have won 7 league titles and a champions league in the last 11 years and consistently qualified for the champions league since 2011. Compare and contrast to Arsenal who yo-yo in and out of the champions league and haven’t won the league in nearly 20 years.
 
Have ESPN released an article detailing how the vote would have turned out if the votes for the teams the that play in red and are based either end of the M62 counted as double yet?

This headline is all you need to know about the football media in this country.

94251EB4-825B-4ED7-813A-3DA1F46AA2D7.jpeg

The seven PL clubs that blocked the proposed ban. Rather than the seven PL clubs that decided they didn’t want the ban.

Then followed by.

Saudi-owned Sheffield United and Abu Dhabi-owned Manchester City were two of the seven clubs who voted against the 'related-party loans' ban.

The other clubs.

The other five teams were: Chelsea, Newcastle, Wolves, Everton and Nottingham Forest. The majority of the seven teams are part of multi-club empires.
 
This headline is all you need to know about the football media in this country.

View attachment 99338

The seven PL clubs that blocked the proposed ban. Rather than the seven PL clubs that decided they didn’t want the ban.

Then followed by.

Saudi-owned Sheffield United and Abu Dhabi-owned Manchester City were two of the seven clubs who voted against the 'related-party loans' ban.

The other clubs.

The other five teams were: Chelsea, Newcastle, Wolves, Everton and Nottingham Forest. The majority of the seven teams are part of multi-club empires.
Burnley apparently voted against as well so it was 12-8 just as Spitty wanted
 
What the red shirts and PL are really worried about is that if and when the charges are dropped they have nothing left to taunt or chase us with.. we’re innocent and you’re fkd not winning anything of note for the next decade.. maybe they might turn their frustration to Newcastle or to Prince William as a member of the Royal Family buys Aston Villa
 
This headline is all you need to know about the football media in this country.

View attachment 99338

The seven PL clubs that blocked the proposed ban. Rather than the seven PL clubs that decided they didn’t want the ban.

Then followed by.

Saudi-owned Sheffield United and Abu Dhabi-owned Manchester City were two of the seven clubs who voted against the 'related-party loans' ban.

The other clubs.

The other five teams were: Chelsea, Newcastle, Wolves, Everton and Nottingham Forest. The majority of the seven teams are part of multi-club empires.
So basically the ‘majority of the seven teams’ quite rightly voted for what could ultimately be in their own best interests then?
This guy is genius!
The red shits have got 8 other clubs and Tottering HotSmithers in their pockets surely WHU, Villa, Brighton have got ambition or perhaps not.
 
This headline is all you need to know about the football media in this country.

View attachment 99338

The seven PL clubs that blocked the proposed ban. Rather than the seven PL clubs that decided they didn’t want the ban.

Then followed by.

Saudi-owned Sheffield United and Abu Dhabi-owned Manchester City were two of the seven clubs who voted against the 'related-party loans' ban.

The other clubs.

The other five teams were: Chelsea, Newcastle, Wolves, Everton and Nottingham Forest. The majority of the seven teams are part of multi-club empires.
‘empires’ lol.
Salty, much.
 
If you're tired, I suggest you go to bed.

He can say what he likes, but so can I. If the Times want to employ a bloke that beat up his wife who was 20 weeks pregnant at the time, that's up to them. I think he's a **** and I think his columns are shit.
Maybe they should have loaned him to a newspaper in Spain
 
Where to start with Simon Stone’s latest slug trail…?


1. The “aren’t Manyoo a great club with how they deal with the kids who don’t make the grade” sycophancy, or
2. City contributorily negligent in case of ex-player’s suicide.

You’d expect crude light-and-shade comparisons on a fan forum, but not in the country’s news media site of record. Or maybe you’ve stopped expecting anything but from this hack.
Jesse Lingard must have been about 6 years old
 
This headline is all you need to know about the football media in this country.

View attachment 99338

The seven PL clubs that blocked the proposed ban. Rather than the seven PL clubs that decided they didn’t want the ban.

Then followed by.

Saudi-owned Sheffield United and Abu Dhabi-owned Manchester City were two of the seven clubs who voted against the 'related-party loans' ban.

The other clubs.

The other five teams were: Chelsea, Newcastle, Wolves, Everton and Nottingham Forest. The majority of the seven teams are part of multi-club empires.

That's democracy for you and playing by the rules. What more do they want?
 
That's democracy for you and playing by the rules. What more do they want?
Nick Harris's office boy Ian Herbert in his column in the Mail on about plucky Everton punishred for paying for a state of the art stadium whilst City and West Ham were gifted free Stadium.
Sorry can not link.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top