PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Bald fraud said:
Didn’t we play Liverpool in the cup not so long ago and klopp complained about the length of the grass? So obvious were the source of these “charges” come from
Click to expand...
I don't remember that, well there you go, scouse twats sticking their oar in again, no charge for their hacking though but it's okay they paid City 1m hush money because they didn't do it.
 
NeilMcnabTwoFooted said:
what possible reason would we decide to play nice after being railroaded then
Click to expand...
What's being nice for to do with it? You said we will go nuclear and release the hounds.

I don't doubt we will not be nice but what hounds?

And what is exactly going nuclear? Shouldst we have done that already since most of the damage is already done (ie to reputation)
 
Norbiton said:
Trial?
Click to expand...
Exposes how stupid Mike Keegan is and many of his colleagues. Not a trial, we have not been “charged.” We have been accused of breaking the internal rules of the PL by its senior management most of whom have no significant legal or financial experience. This is why we need an independent regulator.
 
Iassel said:
Sue who for what?

Even in the absolute best case scenario that this is all a wild goose chase, trying to rehash the UEFA case, the fact still remains that City could’ve put this to bed at any time in the past 5 years, rather than clam up on legal advice and refuse to respond to the PL’s fishing trips.

No court in the world is going to rule jn your favour for something you could’ve actively prevented.
Click to expand...
stop posting shit
 
Bald fraud said:
Didn’t we play Liverpool in the cup not so long ago and klopp complained about the length of the grass? So obvious were the source of these “charges” come from
Click to expand...
I thought the 'grass length' thing was a mistake? Something to do with the rule book for each year having different numbering - so rule 112b, or whatever, referred to grass length in the current rule book, but in the year we were being charged for, it referred to something financial.
 
WRicko said:
So that genius Simon Jordan thinks we must be guilt because if we where innocent we would want this resolved as quickly as possible.

First off who says we don’t ?

Second if I am on CCTV seen committing a murder and policeman turns up to witness me trying to cover things up but sees me with the murder weapon in my hand and blood all over me it won’t take long to convict if however there is more doubt less evidence or even no evidence but it’s hard to prove a negative then I would spend ages at court with character witness and counter theories counter evidence like I was somewhere else and here is the proof etc

Also he says we will appeal to CAS first don’t think we can second he is assuming guilt again
Click to expand...
The dick head wrote an article in the Mail yesterday saying United should be more like city if they want to be successful! Is he taking the piss!
 
OntarioBlue said:
If this timeline Is true, if the Premier League have a case and if City have “irrefutable evidence of our innocence” why is it taking so long to have a hearing ?
Click to expand...
Sounds to me like we’ve said we have irrefutable evidence bring it on! And they’re still scratching around for something to pin on us!
 
NeilMcnabTwoFooted said:
it’s a massive historical case over many years with all manner of serious allegations against us if you think we can just reproduce a few pages n say hey presto here ya go then your being naive, just relax our board are doing there due diligence we’ll prove our innocence & if they want to fit us up i strongly believe we’ll release the hounds so to speak & show all our enemies misdeeds and take the league down go nuclear, the PL don’t want that
Click to expand...

I am relaxed, incredibly relaxed but from what we hear there are 5 or 6 charges repeated.

I’ve stated Im no legal expert (naive) but unless we have to prove & back up every line of our accounts as opposed to answer the particular area they suspect & need to prove is false.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top