gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Or the 115 charges.Mad to think this time last year all the Cancelo drama and subsequent change in form hadn’t even happened yet.
Or the 115 charges.Mad to think this time last year all the Cancelo drama and subsequent change in form hadn’t even happened yet.
Correct.I don’t have a problem with people taking issue with the name, or that they preferred the old format, or even that it was (subjectively) better, but to suggest it was harder to win under the previous format is simply wrong.
You got beat - you were out. Like any cup competition should be.A big problem for me with the old European Cup was the open draws with a complete lack of seeding. No issue with when you’re dealing with the traditions of the FA Cup but not ideal when determining the best team in Europe.
There were a few instances when a number of strong clubs were drawn against each other in a few different early round ties leaving the way clear for lesser lights to progress deep into the competition. When Forest first lifted the trophy in 1979 they admittedly had a brutal draw (holders Liverpool) in the first round but after getting through that, their run up to and including the final was embarrassingly gentle. Villa’s run to the 1982 final was also incredibly straightforward as were a couple of instances involving the dippers.
The straw that broke the camel’s back was when arguably the two best teams in Europe (Real Madrid and Maradona’s Napoli) were drawn against each other in the first round in 1987-88. Broadcasters decided the competition’s credibility was suffering and it needed a revamp if they were going to pay for the rights. The initial Champions League rebranding emerged a few years after that.
Bye was probably a tougher challenge than Crusaders.Correct.
Liverpool did the double in the 70s and this was their entire itinerary.
76/77 - Crusaders, Trabzonpor, Saint Etienne, Zurich and Moenchengladbach.
77/78 - Bye (a fuckin bye) Dresden, Benfica, Moenchengladbach and Brugge
80/81 - OPS, Aberdeen (Knox not him), CSKA, Bayern (didn't win either match. Real Madrid.
If we won the League Cup playing them we would be slaughtered for soft draws.
Do you trust them not to rig the draw though. The scousers would have rough balls …You got beat - you were out. Like any cup competition should be.
You draw an easy team - great.
You draw a tough team - not great. But thems the breaks. None of this seeded horseshit where teams can’t play each other.
All the names, in a bag, you might get an easy route, you might not. Just like it should be.
Apart from that penalty!I don’t think we have the leaders we had in recent Anfield meetings and that is a concern. Toure, Kev, Sergio, Silva, Vinnie, Fernandinho…. And we probably lack the composure that Mahrez and Gundo provided.
That’s a separate argument to whether it should be restricted simply to the Champions of each UEFA member though.You got beat - you were out. Like any cup competition should be.
You draw an easy team - great.
You draw a tough team - not great. But thems the breaks. None of this seeded horseshit where teams can’t play each other.
All the names, in a bag, you might get an easy route, you might not. Just like it should be.
Apart from that penalty!
Yep. Champions only. No groups, straight draw, knockout.That’s a separate argument to whether it should be restricted simply to the Champions of each UEFA member though.
It never felt quite like the curse was broken though for me when we beat them with no fans in the stands. Non the less it was a win though. I'd take a draw now personally.
We have lost one of our last 5 visits to their midden and that was a Cancelo cock up that gave them a lucky 1-0 win , you worry too much :)And we have Newcastle, spurs, Liverpool all away, we will also drop points. The Liverpool game worries me more than anything tbh.
We have lost one of our last 5 visits to their midden and that was a Cancelo cock up that gave them a lucky 1-0 win , you worry too much :)
We have lost one of our last 5 visits to their midden and that was a Cancelo cock up that gave them a lucky 1-0 win , you worry too much :)
Which level, they are hardly winning convincingly,despite our run of draws and losses we are potentially 2 points behind, their defence isn't great.They''ll drop points,if we do what we are capable of we'll win it.We might not win it but we are and should be favourites.Liverpool with there front 6 options are favourites for me because they play at that speed level next 18 games they'll be hard to catch
Opta have it City 60% Liverpool 32% and 8% the rest so similar to the bookies.Liverpool and City are establishing themselves as the main two again this season.
I believe both teams are on an upward trajectory in terms of form, but that Liverpool's is slightly more established - they're just not losing and playing slightly better as the weeks go by. City's form is improving but we're only just out of a horrid patch.
City's tough aways include Newcastle, Liverpool & Spurs - Liverpool away is after the Copenhagen home leg, so that needs wrapping up in the away leg.
Liverpool's tough aways are Arsenal really. They have Utd & Villa away as well, but let's be honest, they're not great teams.
Liverpool's defence is an injury away from causing issues (pre ~March) while i think our squad is about to settle into some steady fitness. City really have to be winning at Newcastle, i think that is crucial. We have the champs league, which is always an extra drain though.
So, very very even in my opinion. Very. Bookies have City at ~58%, Liverpool ~31% and ~13% bar (overround included). I'd put City and Liverpool much more evenly matched to be honest, even if we win at the Barcodes, but i think if we slip-up at Newcastle we'll see a money/media/fan tide of opinion towards Liverpool. Lots more games to play.
Which level, they are hardly winning convincingly,despite our run of draws and losses we are potentially 2 points behind, their defence isn't great.They''ll drop points,if we do what we are capable of we'll win it.We might not win it but we are and should be favourites.