Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
halfcenturyup said:
You should try the inhaler allegation and see how long that lasts, and then compare to the post alleging illegal spending. Then complain again.
Click to expand...

Hell, we should all do it. Find an offensive comment about City, complain about it, post an almost identical comment about Liverpool and United, then tabulate the differences in responses. And then publish it.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Hell, we should all do it. Find an offensive comment about City, complain about it, post an almost identical comment about Liverpool and United, then tabulate the differences in responses. And then publish it.
Click to expand...

Sport department there are run by rag kunts whose head of the bbc? That where fans should write or send emails regularly with example of bias at the so called unbiased bbc! Complaining to the sport part is a waste of time and I'd bet they laughing they cocks of at it! Go straight to the top and call those who run the sport department as bias with example of bias as in who you post about!
 
give it to gordon said:
View attachment 103978

This wasnt allowed.

So I made a complaint against this , with in seconds I got an answer

View attachment 103980

View attachment 103981

Fucking joke the bbc
Click to expand...

Well, that's a disappointment. I actually registered with the BBC to complain about this Nezza guy referring to illegal spending, expecting to be refused, and so I could build a case for bias against City. I got this. The bastards.

If you find any other posts you think are defamatory, let me know and I will try it again :)

Your complaint​

Hello
Thanks for recently reporting a comment on the BBC site.
We’ve looked into this and you’re right – it broke house rules. We’ve removed the offending content (reference: 225cb920-60e8-4425-99fc-836a93e7b99a).
Thank you for pointing this out, and keeping the BBC site an enjoyable place for everyone.
Please don’t reply to this email, because the address isn’t monitored.
Regards,
BBC Moderation Team
 
Just watched MOTD on iPlayer. Very fair and very gushing about Pep, especially KDB, the team, and City in general.
 
Most of the comments after the Newcastle v City BBC match report were very fair and sensible from proper football fans. The loved the game and the goals. Unfortunately you will always get the bitter Liverpool fans, especially the bitter Liverpool fans, bitter United fans, and general City hating football fans, leaving 115 charges comments. That’s all they’ve got left to cling on to. As for BBC Football in general, it’s nothing more than a Rag, and to an extent, a Liverpool biased website, no different to the football tabloids.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Well, that's a disappointment. I actually registered with the BBC to complain about this Nezza guy referring to illegal spending, expecting to be refused, and so I could build a case for bias against City. I got this. The bastards.

If you find any other posts you think are defamatory, let me know and I will try it again :)

Your complaint​

Hello
Thanks for recently reporting a comment on the BBC site.
We’ve looked into this and you’re right – it broke house rules. We’ve removed the offending content (reference: 225cb920-60e8-4425-99fc-836a93e7b99a).
Thank you for pointing this out, and keeping the BBC site an enjoyable place for everyone.
Please don’t reply to this email, because the address isn’t monitored.
Regards,
BBC Moderation Team
Click to expand...

How does that work ? I got a reply within 30 seconds say that Nezza post was ok lololol
 
halfcenturyup said:
Well, that's a disappointment. I actually registered with the BBC to complain about this Nezza guy referring to illegal spending, expecting to be refused, and so I could build a case for bias against City. I got this. The bastards.

If you find any other posts you think are defamatory, let me know and I will try it again :)

Your complaint​

Hello
Thanks for recently reporting a comment on the BBC site.
We’ve looked into this and you’re right – it broke house rules. We’ve removed the offending content (reference: 225cb920-60e8-4425-99fc-836a93e7b99a).
Thank you for pointing this out, and keeping the BBC site an enjoyable place for everyone.
Please don’t reply to this email, because the address isn’t monitored.
Regards,
BBC Moderation Team
Click to expand...
Maybe the result of chipping away. Either that or they aren’t all rags on the moderating team
 
journolud said:
Maybe the result of chipping away. Either that or they aren’t all rags on the moderating team
Click to expand...
It was probably an intern on their 1st shift… sadly it’s probably an ex-intern this morning… or one that has had their job requirements re-explained to them.
 
MOTD seemed short especially the second half and made it look a more even game. And didn’t show the bad tackles by Newcastle not saying they warrant sendings off or complaints about the ref even though I think he got them wrong but the main reason for watching highlights other than enjoying the good bits is to check if you initial thoughts where wrong or if the ref got someone thing wrong. Cannot do that if it’s not shown. Dan Burn seems like a horrible play
 
hammocity said:
Yes, but they did make it look like Newcastle were all over us, showed virtually every bit of their attacking play whilst leaving several of our forward play out
Click to expand...
You only have to look at the stats to show how much of a one sided game it was in that second half, but to be fair Newcastle did have opportunities. In a 10 minute slot I`d sooner watch the play than fucking tackles.
 
Just seen the sky ad for the second half of the prem season. "The Usual Suspects" mentioned then footage of us and then Liverpool. Yes the team who have won 2 titles in, what is it? 30 years!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top