Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hooray Henry on talkshite currently using a tennis journo's death to big up sports journalism despite it being in the sewer.
 
I see Slimy Salford Stone has allowed comments on his article about the defector to the Rags kowing fully it will be full of Rag comments about leaving a sinking ship/charges etc
Said it before, but why has the club not banned this tosser from our ground and still allows this Rag mouthpiece access
 
I see Slimy Salford Stone has allowed comments on his article about the defector to the Rags kowing fully it will be full of Rag comments about leaving a sinking ship/charges etc
Said it before, but why has the club not banned this tosser from our ground and still allows this Rag mouthpiece access
The club should let him have a one to one interview with Andy Morrison's fists.
 
Turned on the tv 1 minute ago.
Sky Sports PL “Saturday social live” was on.
5 people around a table, must be talking about best players in the premier league.

The woman (sorry to all women on here) actual words were “De Bruyne needs to keep his current form up for the next 5 years to be anywhere near Steven Gerrard, which is going to be hard as he’s in his 30’s”

They all agreed and Gerrard put in as number 1

I decided to walk away and go for a shit
I think that's what they should have done.
 
I like that bit about winning the premier league every year the fucking bitter cunts.
I thought we'd been sharing the honours with the dippers? Just listened to a podcast where the journos seem to believe Arnold, Darwin and friends have gone to the top of the league unnoticed this season. Do they really manage to forget what they've been scribbling every day?
 
Even paying the press/media a complement gets my post removed lol.

View attachment 104693
The spotty red shirt adolescents working on the BBC on-line content are now so twisted that you could use any one of them to remove a cork from a bottle. It’s truly pathetic and baffling that the BBC continues to so blatantly support the anti City bias. There is no attempt at any balance which is what they are supposed to be about.

Good on you for the intervention with that quite disgraceful post. Someone’s going to cop a dismissal or legal action when we are exonerated.
 
The spotty red shirt adolescents working on the BBC on-line content are now so twisted that you could use any one of them to remove a cork from a bottle. It’s truly pathetic and baffling that the BBC continues to so blatantly support the anti City bias. There is no attempt at any balance which is what they are supposed to be about.

Good on you for the intervention with that quite disgraceful post. Someone’s going to cop a dismissal or legal action when we are exonerated.

Said it before if you want to complain email the head of the bbc not some some ex rag fanzine seller who runs the online sport at the bbc!
 
Maybe the daft fuck can explain why, with Busby's knowledge, the rags gave 16 year old Peter Lorimer's dad a brown envelope containg £5,000 to sign for them. In the early 60s that was 10 times the average annual industrial wage. After he insisted he wanted to join Leeds his dad handed it back. Or when Ryan Giggs signed his mum had her house fully kitted out with white goods. Or when Nicky Butt signed his dad drove out of the swamp in a brand new Mercedes.
Much earlier Busby organised the purchase of a house for Duncan Edward’s parents. This was a sweetener to persuade him to sign for United rather than his local team, Wolves, who he had been associated with previously.
 
Agree.

I think the club does as well, hence why they won't take him to the cleaners.
It's weird. If a person had this level of fixation about another person, they would be deemed obsessive to the point of being dangerous, and might face civil sanctions, restrictions, or restraint. Against an entity though, and it's ok.

Regardless of any personal difficulties he might have been through, I wouldn't be sorry to see City act against him if and when we are cleared. His personal circumstances haven't softened his attitude towards us, and should not be used as an excuse for his vitriolic lies.
 
It's weird. If a person had this level of fixation about another person, they would be deemed obsessive to the point of being dangerous, and might face civil sanctions, restrictions, or restraint. Against an entity though, and it's ok.

Regardless of any personal difficulties he might have been through, I wouldn't be sorry to see City act against him if and when we are cleared. His personal circumstances haven't softened his attitude towards us, and should not be used as an excuse for his vitriolic lies.
"City drive journalist with Mental Health issues to suicide!"
 
The spotty red shirt adolescents working on the BBC on-line content are now so twisted that you could use any one of them to remove a cork from a bottle. It’s truly pathetic and baffling that the BBC continues to so blatantly support the anti City bias. There is no attempt at any balance which is what they are supposed to be about.

Good on you for the intervention with that quite disgraceful post. Someone’s going to cop a dismissal or legal action when we are exonerated.
Well said
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top