PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

His response should have been 'I can't comment while the Premier League case is being heard'.

It took very little manipulation by the press to misrepresent his words as they did, so that the average football fan heard 'City were guilty, UEFA were right to prosecute, and CAS got it wrong'.

It wasn't difficult to predict how it would play out in the court of public opinion. Even the President of UEFA could have worked it out.
By rights it should make his position untenable. The head honcho commenting in a way to prejudice an ongoing investigation is on the same don’t fucking do it list as kissing a player in celebration.
 
Strange how they go after us for financial reasons yet we consistently prove we are better run and less wasteful than all the red shirted detritus that we compete with. They need to have a good look at their own finances, useless fuckers.


Manchester City - losses of 59m euros (£51m) and Bayern Munich - losses of 61m euros (£52m) - "have the best balances among the most competitive teams" the report said.

& even then they make us share the ‘best balance’ with Bayern when we are lower.
 
I do wonder how he was with Stefan after they were off air... How much is a persona for the mic etc. would be interesting to get his perspective if he feels able to share.

Yes I wondered that & since he’s changed to ‘we are guilty but we’ll get off’ so I think they spoke a bit.
 
Agree with most of that but my gut feeling is the PL has virtually no evidence. If they had a smoking gun they would have sanctioned us by now. If they had anything significant it would have leaked out to their pals in the media. I believe the so-called investigation is just another attempt to smear City. When you see how weak Richard Masters is in public it is easy to see how he could be manipulated by devious powerful people. The end game for the PL was always about damaging City to keep LFC, MUFC, Spurs, and Arsenal Directors happy.

I think that is the most likely outcome too, it will be a re-run of UEFA’s but more proof needed.

They won’t be able to prove fraud, then everything will become time barred and we will have got away with it (it seems slightly predictable if we have both read it right).

The 115 charges has worked well for them rather then just charging us for FFP, has really played out in the public as they would have wanted.

My advice to blues is to wear it once this is all over, 115, got of on a technicality, time barred etc. I know we want everyone to know we are innocent but nothing we will say will ever change some opposing fans mind who listens to Simon Jordan all day.

So go the opposite, United did it back in the day when everyone was accusing them of having FA/ refs in their pocket.

They sung we do what we want…Was a frustrating chant when they where successful.

That should be City fans response, really wind up the opposition once we are cleared on this technicality as they will no doubt claim.

Were Man City, we’ll spend what we want

City, City, the best lawyers in the land and all the world

Long away trip…

There was 115 charges by the Premier League, 115 charges by the Premier League and if Lord Pannick was to get 1 time barred, there would be 114 charges by the Premier League.

This last one is a joke, as I don’t think anyone would want to sing all those verses
 
Last edited:
Owned by family trust
Inheritance taxes dodge perhaps?
Not an expert or even close to it but I understand that means at least halving inheritance taxes.
He does live ex-pat in The Bahamas but maybe the family have some genuine allegiance to the UK and would be liable.
But above all, I'm sure he will be acting within the law and is totally above board and a fine gentleman in the view of the EPL.
 
Just on the subject of City fans being easy to manipulate. I don't think the reactions some people are having is surprising at all. It would be worse if Liverpool or United fans had to put up with the same every week. It's almost like they are attempting to subject City fans to the press equivalent of Chinese Water Torture(the one with the constant drip on the forehead).

They literally write headlines to bait City fans these days:

The latest one from talkSport earlier today courtesy of Simon Jordan:

'Simon Jordan Issues Stern WARNING To Manchester City Fans Amidst 115 FFP Charges! '

I'm sure that's crossing some sort of line, with how they've directly addressed the fanbase there. It's even more blatant than usual. Perhaps part of the reason, is Simon's getting his own back, after City fans tore him to shreds, over the Stefan interview. He's petty like that.
Simon Jordan just likes the sound of his own voice, no fooker else does lol
It was like the pupil teaching the teacher with stefan v Jordan,
Stefan cool as a cucumber in his little school blazer & the teacher getting annoyed coz he has no comebacks apart from mutterings under his breath, thinking to himself,
I'm being schooled here lmao
Fook Jordan & the rest!
I trust in our club!
If the PL had anything significant on us, we'd be fooked by now!
Stay positive blues & fook the haters :)
 
Simon Jordan just likes the sound of his own voice, no fooker else does lol
It was like the pupil teaching the teacher with stefan v Jordan,
Stefan cool as a cucumber in his little school blazer & the teacher getting annoyed coz he has no comebacks apart from mutterings under his breath, thinking to himself,
I'm being schooled here lmao
Fook Jordan & the rest!
I trust in our club!
If the PL had anything significant on us, we'd be fooked by now!
Stay positive blues & fook the haters :)
Well said mate
 
Aww, he's just doing his job....

willie-mrburns.gif


In all seriousness though, Simon Jordan(and his team, such as, whoever is choosing the video titles) is not just doing his job, he's being personal and extra with it. Go look at his Chelsea, Newcastle, Everton debates and so on, who've had similar stories and you'll see there's a massively disproportionate lack of balance in how he approaches City.

Nobody needs to believe a word he's saying, take everything with a pinch of salt, bashing City must be making them money, we can agree on all that... But at the same time, fuck him, he deserves every bit of flack he gets. It's also good fun ripping him to shreds.

Maybe it's just me who sees it and he's nowhere near as bad as him yet but he seems to at least be veering off in the direction of Nick Harris level of personal, when it comes to City.

He'll even gaslight the audience/comment section, if they suggest he has agendas. Dropping in comments like:

'We don't have agendas on this show, that's silly',
or: 'I remember City at Maine Road blah blah, so it's not that I have it in for City',
or: 'I'm the same with Eddie Hearn as I am with Uncle Frank, blah blah blah'.

What does he think, that we'll all go: 'oh well, if he's saying that, then we must have him wrong'? Rather than, deduce that he's full of shit and shameless with it. :)
I think Jordan is toxic as far as City are concerned. He is close to Levy and Parry and they are obviously feeding him lines. He also knows there is money to be made from peddlling an anti-City agenda. There are a lot of LFC and MUFC fans out there.
 
Agree with most of that but my gut feeling is the PL has virtually no evidence. If they had a smoking gun they would have sanctioned us by now. If they had anything significant it would have leaked out to their pals in the media. I believe the so-called investigation is just another attempt to smear City. When you see how weak Richard Masters is in public it is easy to see how he could be manipulated by devious powerful people. The end game for the PL was always about damaging City to keep LFC, MUFC, Spurs, and Arsenal Directors happy.

I’ve always assumed their evidence is just the further leaked emails that came out after the CAS judgment and we haven’t responded to them fully, hence the charges and the non compliance. Once it gets to the IC, I’m assuming we’ll then provide further evidence like we did at CAS.

It’s difficult to know whether the Pl were right to take it to the next step without knowing how we responded to them and what our evidence we provided for it was. We’ll only know that when we get the judgment.
 
simon jordan is a ****, but he's only doing his job,
which is to attract a listening audience to the radio station he works for.

he's also possibly being financially encouraged to throw shit at us by people outwith the radio station.

he's a snide fucker who loves winding people up.
why are blues letting him wind them up?
that's what he wants.
fuck's sake, just laugh at the tosser.



in advance of the replies along the lines of...
"but fans of other clubs believe his bullshit"
and
"city should sue him, city should sue everyone,
et cetera"

why do you care what other people think?
and
our owners do things quietly, not in public.
what comes round goes round.
the long game is far more successful than the kneejerk approach.


chill out, brothers and sisters.
channel your energy into to something more positive than hating idiots.

we've come so far, don't let the fuckers get under your skin.
better to laugh at their patheticness and enjoy your days following the mighty blues.
Ur name says it all :) lol 100% with ye on this
 
I know I shouldn't do this as there is a million better ways to spend my precious time BUT I stupidly replied to Nick Harris tweet and am discussing the appointment of judges at CAS. They are convinced we picked two. Has anyone got the link to or screenshot of how they are picked?

This poont is one of the most annoying to me as a quick sense check would obviously lead to anyone with that opionon to think, that doesn't make sense. Why would Uefa agree to an abratation where their opponent gets to pick two judges effectively meaning they can never win a case.

Last check - I am correct thay it was on one pick each and then both parties agree on the chairman?

Thanks in advance
 
I know I shouldn't do this as there is a million better ways to spend my precious time BUT I stupidly replied to Nick Harris tweet and am discussing the appointment of judges at CAS. They are convinced we picked two. Has anyone got the link to or screenshot of how they are picked?

This poont is one of the most annoying to me as a quick sense check would obviously lead to anyone with that opionon to think, that doesn't make sense. Why would Uefa agree to an abratation where their opponent gets to pick two judges effectively meaning they can never win a case.

Last check - I am correct thay it was on one pick each and then both parties agree on the chairman?

Thanks in advance
If I remember right, UEFA picked one, City picked one, then City suggested the 3rd and UEFA agreed it was a good choice. If they couldn't have agreed themselves, on the 3rd judge, CAS would have stepped in and chosen someone for them. So, Nick needs to think about that properly, before making anything of it.
 
Last edited:
If I remember right, UEFA picked one, City picked one, then City suggested the 3rd and UEFA agreed it was a good choice. If they couldn't have agreed themselves, on the 3rd judge, CAS would have stepped in and chosen someone for them. So, Nick needs to think about that properly, before making anything of it.
Thanks mate. Just to be clear I'm not messaging with Nick himself. Two Liverpool fans. Ha. What am I doing... ;)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top