Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,770
Which is what people are doing after Wallace’s interview.Exactly. Judge as you find.
Which is what people are doing after Wallace’s interview.Exactly. Judge as you find.
Please feel free to give other examples of people I can declare a level of superiority to…He was just an example. People can consider what they want to consider. That’s life.
TouchéWhich is what people are doing after Wallace’s interview.
Don’t believe everything you read in the Daily Mail…Which is what people are doing after Wallace’s interview.
Stephen Fry.Please feel free to give other examples of people I can declare a level of superiority to…
David Silva.Please feel free to give other examples of people I can declare a level of superiority to…
My English is superior to David Silva‘s.David Silva.
I don’t. This is an actual interview though and he’s not come out and said it’s false.Don’t believe everything you read in the Daily Mail…
My taste in women is superior to Stephen Fry.Stephen Fry.
Hmmmm…My taste in women is superior to Stephen Fry.
I think it must be some indication.
It’s so easy to be superior from behind your keyboard isn’t it?
I think someone from a working class background who succeeds when they have had less opportunities than others at least provides an indication that they are likely to be hard working, determined and resourceful, all of which are laudable characteristics.Not in terms of career or money unless made good means something else.
I think someone from a working class background who succeeds when they have had less opportunities than others at least provides an indication that they are likely to be hard working, determined and resourceful, all of which are laudable characteristics.
I think someone from a working class background who succeeds when they have had less opportunities than others at least provides an indication that they are likely to be hard working, determined and resourceful, all of which are laudable characteristics.
Fewer opportunities.I think someone from a working class background who succeeds when they have had less opportunities than others at least provides an indication that they are likely to be hard working, determined and resourceful, all of which are laudable characteristics.
You are quite correct.Fewer opportunities.
could also be down to sociopathic or psychopathic behaviour which could help them to success and lead to them trampling on others. In Gregg’s case I’m leaving it at ‘seems a ****’I think someone from a working class background who succeeds when they have had less opportunities than others at least provides an indication that they are likely to be hard working, determined and resourceful, all of which are laudable characteristics.