PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Thing is Tolmie in good faith related what a source from another club said. No guarantees just potentially hopeful noises for us.
 
cityzen81 said:
Because Tolmies source was saying the IC had concerns over the charges levied when City had give the evidence required?

How would a club official from another club know that? They wouldn’t unless the IC isn’t independent/impartial which were told by the legal beagles on here that in nigh impossible and fanciful
Click to expand...

Unless it’s United’s new ceo?
 
cityzen81 said:
What I’m saying is Tolmie has passed on info he’s heard in good faith but it basically just someone’s opinion from another club and should be taken as such

There is no way the IC has said to anyone at this stage what the source stating they have
Click to expand...
You can’t possibly make that last claim unless you are sitting on the tribunal. This case has been leaking like a sieve from the beginning. Why stop now? Because it’s immoral? Haha

If we believe the rags/dips/arse+spurs have influence over masters do you not think they would have influence or at the very least the ear of the tribunal?

The rhetoric is changing because the evidence to support city’s position is irrefutable.
 
Last edited:
cityzen81 said:
Because Tolmies source was saying the IC had concerns over the charges levied when City had give the evidence required?

How would a club official from another club know that? They wouldn’t unless the IC isn’t independent/impartial which were told by the legal beagles on here that in nigh impossible and fanciful
Click to expand...
The IC is not independent nor impartial regardless of what any F. Lee Bailey tries to tell us...
 
cityzen81 said:
He had been let go/banned by City at the time and was trying to stay relevant, he took a massive gamble calling the verdict and he burnt whatever bridges he had left at the club in doing so.

Not even City knew the verdict when he was tweeting the words “exonerated”.

He took a punt and was 99% correct
Click to expand...
There was other people the night before had the same information.we were given the heads up
 
mrtwiceaseason said:
There was other people the night before had the same information.we were given the heads up
Click to expand...
We weren’t. It has been confirmed on here by people in the know that City didn’t know till just before the announcement.

People jumped on Ian’s tweet, it was nothing more than a punt.
 
cityzen81 said:
We weren’t. It has been confirmed on here by people in the know that City didn’t know till just before the announcement.

People jumped on Ian’s tweet, it was nothing more than a punt.
Click to expand...
Not sure when Ian's tweet went out just checked we knew at 9 25 on July 9th
 
cityzen81 said:
Because Tolmies source was saying the IC had concerns over the charges levied when City had give the evidence required?

How would a club official from another club know that? They wouldn’t unless the IC isn’t independent/impartial which were told by the legal beagles on here that in nigh impossible and fanciful
Click to expand...
Don't be so naive.
 
spiny said:
A new stadium or extended Old Trafford with pipedreams of a 90k+ capacity are dreamland. ManU are a club in decline with huge debts and requirng huge investment to get near City who continue to forge ahead whilst ManU prevaricate.

Only so long you can disguise facts.
Click to expand...
I'll hold my hands up and admit I've never bothered reading any of your posts (my bad) but I'm starting to warm to them :)
 
Does anyone have a link to the breakdown of the charges from back in February last year? It might be on here from then but that’s a lot of pages… there was an actual breakdown of them including grass too long too short, food in canteen cold, drug room location and the like…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top