PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Absolutely nothing happens in this world in a vacuum. People who know people will ask how's the investigation going and it will be passed on. I have no trouble believing that generalities (not specifics perhaps) get passed on.

There must be back and forth with both legal teams with people on the independent panel and they will be asking questions of what the arguments are before anything commences. We’ve found with Everton nothing can be kept watertight and their hearing, wouldn’t surprise me if the feedback of all the evidence is that the Premier league has a flimsy case.
 
They will attribute it to that regardless.

Even if we are found guilty, but not punished as severely as they'd like to see.
They will because they want us desperately to go away. Opposition supporters are not interested if we are innocent or guilty because they have already made their minds up, helped by almost all the mainstream media's dailly jibes about how we have cheated our way to our success. Because they can't beat City on the pitch they have resorted to wanting us to be punished whether we have broken their made up rules or not, which by the way didn't exist until the Sheik rocked up and pissed on there collective parades. This is all they have now.
 
The integrity of the PL was compromised when the rags and dippers were allowed to select Masters as their poodle.
I think its really telling that none of the mainstream media (or anyone else) reported or passed comment on the Parliamentary committee stating at the end of the enquiry, that Masters and Parry didn't know what they were doing and were dragging their feet over change. All their mates in the press just closed ranks, as we have experienced.
 
Exactly - it's like we have to salivate on Khaldoon's vehement denial for a whole 12 months - and a "that's good enough for you" treatment of the fans - yet we're that one's that have to take this relentless diatribe about our guilt every fcking day and turn up and cheer and shout and that's it. That's why rare snippets of resistance from people like Jay and Stefan are so needed - the club is giving us nothing - nobody expects the legal ins and outs, understandably, above all our pay grades - but a bit of "we totally refute the premise of that article" would go a long way.

This is the crux, I think it's also feeding into a lot of us just turning up on match days and going with the flow, I've felt indifferent all season which I've never felt before, genuinely not enjoying it because there's all this going on behind the scenes, can't talk footy with colleagues now as it just ends up ridiculous name calling etc.

Totally bored with the lot of it, the club need to start showing some passion to get us fans up for the fight again.
 
They will because they want us desperately to go away. Opposition supporters are not interested if we are innocent or guilty because they have already made their minds up, helped by almost all the mainstream media's dailly jibes about how we have cheated our way to our success. Because they can't beat City on the pitch they have resorted to wanting us to be punished whether we have broken their made up rules or not, which by the way didn't exist until the Sheik rocked up and pissed on there collective parades. This is all they have now.
The media have definitely set out to paint City as guilty from the outset... they've dictated the narrative to oppositiom fans.
If it had been any of the Red cartel in the frame they would have actively set out to downplay the charges, they would have gone to great lengths to exhonerate them.
 
This is the crux, I think it's also feeding into a lot of us just turning up on match days and going with the flow, I've felt indifferent all season which I've never felt before, genuinely not enjoying it because there's all this going on behind the scenes, can't talk footy with colleagues now as it just ends up ridiculous name calling etc.

Totally bored with the lot of it, the club need to start showing some passion to get us fans up for the fight again.
Yep - some say just ignore it (trying to be helpful) - but that's OK if you can remove yourself from it - living and working in Manchester it gets to you after a while, plus elsewhere else I imagine, with the biased, snidey, media reporting.
Gets deflating.
 
The media have definitely set out to paint City as guilty from the outset... they've dictated the narrative to oppositiom fans.
If it had been any of the Red cartel in the frame they would have actively set out to downplay the charges, they would have gone to great lengths to exhonerate them.
They already have done, barely anything on the rags actually failing FFP.
 
Endlessly we have been told that City's case is "difficult" and "complicated" and that is why it is taking much longer than Everton's. This is after it took the PL 4 years to find anything to charge us with and then rush the rap sheet out that it included not cutting the grass properly. And then a date for the hearing was fixed but Masters didn't know when it was. So why is it "difficult"? What makes it "complicated"? It appears that many of the charges are a second chance to make the charges stick that UEFA failed with. CAS ruled (eleven times?) that UEFA actually had NO evidence to support ANY of the charges. If the PL have new evidence presumably they unearthed it in the course of 4 years painstaking investigation and it showed them CLEARLY what City had done wrong. So why did it take Levy's intervention to prod them into action? Why and how did it prod the PL into making such a bungled go at the charges? And finally, if City provided a large body of evidence we consider unanswerable months ago why is it so long before a ruling is made? Is there a certain degree of wriggling in the hope of finding an exit?
 
The media have definitely set out to paint City as guilty from the outset... they've dictated the narrative to oppositiom fans.
If it had been any of the Red cartel in the frame they would have actively set out to downplay the charges, they would have gone to great lengths to exhonerate them.
They would of. When ushited failed FFP the press activity worked to play their failure down by saying that it was a minor failing only. Contrast that we the scrutiny City has been put under.
 
Not true. City staff were told on the Friday afternoon before the Monday announcement that we'd won on all the main charges. One City fan who helps run a supporters club branch got hold of the info as he had a relative who worked at the club and blabbed to all and sundry down the pub on the Saturday night. I got a WhatsApp off a mate on the Sunday evening confirming this. It also explains how Ian Cheeseman might've got hold of it. He doesn't need to hear it directly from a contact within the club because he's got plenty of mates outside the club who have contacts within.
It was a great scoop by Ian Cheeseman and like a true pro (a dying breed) he will never reveal his source.
 
I think its really telling that none of the mainstream media (or anyone else) reported or passed comment on the Parliamentary committee stating at the end of the enquiry, that Masters and Parry didn't know what they were doing and were dragging their feet over change. All their mates in the press just closed ranks, as we have experienced.
That was very telling because for a Commons Committee to tell the two bosses of the EFL and the PL to their faces: “You don’t know what you’re doing” is a story in anybody’s books. The media silence just confirms that a significant section of the press are being dishonest with their reporting of City.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top