PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Betterdeedthan red said:
I'm getting to the point they can keep it.
I was going to knock it on the head after this season.
The way I'm feeling at the moment I'm not sure I'll bother going again .
Sold my ticket for the last 3 games including tonight.
Don't even think I can be arsed with the rags game
Click to expand...
Nothing beats being at the match. Nothing.
 
Question for those that know about these things….

City are being investigated for the seasons 2009 to 2018 presumably because the investigations started in 2018.

Could we face a second investigation from 2019 to 2024, particularly if found guilty of the first one?

@projectriver or @Prestwich_Blue may know but if anyone else does I would be interested to know. It’s in the light of the fact that Everton may also face a second lot of charges.
 
Cobwebcat said:
Question for those that know about these things….

City are being investigated for the seasons 2009 to 2018 presumably because the investigations started in 2018.

Could we face a second investigation from 2019 to 2024, particularly if found guilty of the first one?

@projectriver or @Prestwich_Blue may know but if anyone else does I would be interested to know. It’s in the light of the fact that Everton may also face a second lot of charges.
Click to expand...
Based on what?
 
Bez said:
We should contact the programme makers and ask for them to do an expose on the Premier League. Here is the link. I feel inclined to test their metal on this one.

www.bbc.co.uk

BBC One - Panorama - Contact Us

contact us panorama
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
Exactly.
A Gov funded media would sooner do a program that appears to criticise SAS / UK terror prevention methods at the same time as condoning a corrupt PL.
 
Cobwebcat said:
Based on the presumption that, if they found us guilty of breaking a rule for 9 years, there is a good chance that this continued in at least part of the next 6?
Click to expand...
The Mancini payments aren't an issue post 2018 obviously, nor are the Fordham image rights. The only other things we think they are looking at are the sponsorships. If they can prove their allegations on those, then they wouldn't need any more years. We would be toast.

Narrator: they can't, though.

:)
 
wolviedinho said:
In my mind this is the scene at CFG while the tribunal asks for more clarity:



The media reporting on city is not true in any shape or form. Nothing but interfering self interested parties foaming at the mouth and screaming from the roof tops. Don’t jump erm on second thoughts go ahead…

City legit won it all. Sooner that is accepted the sooner they can all learn to cope.
Click to expand...

The redshirts are like Trump:”They stole it, they stole it.” Hopefully they will suffer the same fate that awaits him……..oblivion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top