PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Jam Tomorrow said:
I think clever folk would observe what I believe is called cognitive dissonance, ie holding two contradictory beliefs.

lets go with City are owned by an oppressive state, ok I know that’s not true but let’s go with it. Arsenal, Man Utd etc take money in the form of sponsorship deals with oppressive sates ie the Emirates and Saudi, but that’s ok.

its like us being owned by Al Capone and the others being paid sponsorship by Al Capone, would that really be ok? Of course it’s bollocks.
Click to expand...

To be fair, there would be a difference between being sponsored by a state owned company to being owned directly by a state. It’s right that we’re privately owned.

Well, depending on what people are criticising about it obviously. There’s definitely hypocrisy in some of it.
 
Blue_Lightsaber said:
View attachment 108476

Plenty of stuff here to go to court with!

C'mon City.. this is way over the line and you're not facing "Rebecca Vardy's account" mitigating factors.. he's specifically mentioned --- City by name!
Click to expand...
I actually think that's just what he wants. He's definitely aching for a response.
 
Manchester1894 said:
Noticed Delaney has really reigned back ffp now and seems to be concentrating on football strangely. Wonder if legal teams are starting to flex. Also Harris falling from grace at national newspapers to an online blog also snacks of a shift from paymasters not wanting to employ these people.
Remember this? https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ern-football-manchester-city-champions-league
A music reviewer does FOUR YEARS of posts on albums/gigs and on the eve of the final posted that. Fuck em.
Click to expand...
Fuck em indeed, let em all pickle away in the juices of their own bitterness and hate.
 
Blue_Lightsaber said:
View attachment 108476

Plenty of stuff here to go to court with!

C'mon City.. this is way over the line and you're not facing "Rebecca Vardy's account" mitigating factors.. he's specifically mentioned --- City by name!
Click to expand...

Wow must be getting to the point City need to take action
 
Harris is obviously being paid for services rendered, but what he doesn't seem to be understand is, what goes around one day may come around. For example, are there whistle blowers who work in HMRC who have visibility of his filed Self Assessments and Company accounts ? Are there whistle blowers who work in his bank and have access to his personal and business accounts ? How much was he paid for his services in Bennel Victims v MCFC, how much was paid for his appearance in the YouTube attack video ? When asked he refuses to answer. He repeatedly accuses former City exec Simon Pearce of committing perjury at CAS2020, when the PL charges are resolved he will be receiving a registered letter about that.
 
mosssideblue said:
Lots of info on here which I don’t really understand so, in layman’s terms, are we in the shit or not?
Click to expand...
Not! Enjoy the football and ignore the idiotic biased fans you may meet in the street. The premier wanted to inflict maximum reputational damage on city because they have been told “we must have done something doh” by the Red media and the clubs that have significant sway within those corporations.

City have already cleared their name at CAS. No evidence of wrongdoing ie no proof Mansour disguised owner investment.

Rags next to get the Haaland hammer -:)
 
Jordan talking about city in the mail again:

Why the Premier League can't win when it comes to Man City's 115 charges... and they were RIGHT to take points off Everton.

Extract below:

The Premier League have found themselves in a zero sum game situation. If they charged and then convicted City, they’d be damaging their product in the eyes of the world as it would look beset with corruption and fraud. But if they did nothing they’d be laughed at for being a toothless tiger and will continue to live in a world of innuendo and insinuation which also damages their product. It’s a case of damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

The above is what they have done to City. Don’t see anyone writing a piece on that!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Gordyola said:
From Companies House

View attachment 108452
Click to expand...
Oh, that’s interesting. Their own website seems to gloss over this. We would need to look at the local regs to see exactly what needs to be published. Nothing here or course, you would have to look at the local registry. I doubt that any audit info beyond the usual statement will be published.
Thanks for posting.
 
Manchester1894 said:
Noticed Delaney has really reigned back ffp now and seems to be concentrating on football strangely. Wonder if legal teams are starting to flex. Also Harris falling from grace at national newspapers to an online blog also snacks of a shift from paymasters not wanting to employ these people.
Remember this? https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ern-football-manchester-city-champions-league
A music reviewer does FOUR YEARS of posts on albums/gigs and on the eve of the final posted that. Fuck em.
Click to expand...
The first four letters of his surname are very appropriate!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top