PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

manimanc said:
Nick "nuttier than a shithouse rat" Harris accusing the deputy prime minister of a country of fraud and corruption.

What a whopper. I actually can't stop laughing at the fact that the goggled eyed bellend pushes this everytime he talks.

We all know he's lurking on here, what a sad little man.
Click to expand...
Heads gone. Poor fucker
 
I thought I hated the dippers, to a lesser extent Unshited & increasingly Arteta & his Arses but this guy really really really hates us.
Anyone know what was the trigger? Bad pint in Mary D’s, no gravy in the chippy or was it a full body cavity search by the classy Showsec
 
Mancini’s Pastilles said:
I dont wanna hear any words of a deal, no deals, we burn them to the ground
Click to expand...
This is exactly what should happen, if we win, the premier league should go public in every paper and sporting outlet to say we are innocent there is nothing to answer to and then hopefully all those dicks will shut the fuck up, yes Nick Harris I mean you.
 
SilverFox2 said:
Frankly for the first time I now understand the important legal difference that allowed us to reach a settlement.

I am not proud to say that Stefan had to literally spell it out to me like he did with Mr Harris.

Thanks Stefan.
Click to expand...
I wonder if Nick Harris will admit to now knowing the legal difference. Or will he just keep spouting lies?
 
Nick’s followers.

It reads like who’s who of City haters, made up of the usual suspects.(not all of them) imagine the usual suspects on a night out. Harris. “So what shall we talk about tonight lads?”

EC67D60B-D7F1-48F9-864B-976856E7F7ED.jpeg

06F87D79-BDE5-4629-8980-A350EE23F88F.jpeg
 
brazilians hurt said:
I thought I hated the dippers, to a lesser extent Unshited & increasingly Arteta & his Arses but this guy really really really hates us.
Anyone know what was the trigger? Bad pint in Mary D’s, no gravy in the chippy or was it a full body cavity search by the classy Showsec
Click to expand...
I personally think it goes back to the day we ran out of chips
 
Nick found himself in the Hall of Fame for being the first contestant on Deal or No Deal to join the 1p club.

 
Using a snippet from a private electronic exchange in an attempt to prove a point rather then the whole conversation providing context, background etc etc. Nothing learned from the CAS verdict?
 
We should refer to Nick as ‘Nick Deal Or No Deal’ from now on, instead of Nick Harris
 
Inter Me Nan said:
How can a financial expert not know what a settlement is?
I know what a settlement is and I'm a pleb on a forum!
Click to expand...
.
01021fdeda9b8c19a16d41ed4b2e9905.gif
 
LeonardoDaVnci said:
All the mood music from within the club indicates the charges are being systematically destroyed year by year. The confidence levels are even higher now than on "charges day" back in February 2023. This begs the question, how the hell is the IC/PL going to extricate itself from this omnishambles. I suspect they will go down the route of "NOT PROVEN" for the substantive charges, i.e., a compromise based on the verdict used in Scottish criminal law. They will no doubt throw in a non-cooperation verdict, probably with another ridiculously high fine, to appease the City haters and afford the PL a wee bit of credibility. This is all my own guesswork, but I can see a situation where the PL will claim a complete lack of jurisdiction over City's sponsors, Etihad, Etisalat, and Aabar, making it impossible to prove the contracts were in any sense illegitimate. I think the same will apply to the Al Jazira/Mancini contract. All independent experts suggest the image rights charges are completely dead in the water, as anything that was dubious would be investigated by HMRC, who clearly are not the slightest bit interested.

So what would the legal advice be to City and the sponsors given a "Not Proven" outcome. The sponsors would have to demonstrate that the IC/PL ruling would cause material damage to their businesses. I doubt they could prove this, so they would probably take no further action. That just leaves the club's response. I'm guessing again, but I think a settlement whereby the PL stated publicly and unequivocally that all historical investigations into City's accounts from 2008 to the present day have been terminated in perpetuity. Of course, the downside would be that this outcome would allow the professional City haters to continue to scrape a subsistence living as click bait life forms, i.e., continuing to spread the inevitable slurs and tropes. Hopefully City's response would involve a newly uplifted long term partnership with Etihad Airways, Let's hope it's a whopper and a world beater, as fitting for the best team in the world.

One thing we have all learned since 2008 is the following: when Khaldoon Mubarak says something is going to happen, we can be pretty sure it will, and that includes his "plenty to say" promise in last year's end-of-season review. Let's just say the chances of Richard Masters being the CEO of the Premier League after this case are virtually zero. He could perhaps form a comedy duo; the "Masters and Harris" podcast would be a sensation with at least 20 subscribers.
Click to expand...
I agree with this interpretation.

When City are found NOT GUILTY, I think (and hope) that the club take the opportunity to draw a very clear,forensic line under these charges and all other mistruths.

I hope Kool Hand sets the record straight once and for all,name names (unlikely I know), and places on record that any further transgressions by individuals or groups of any kind will be met with punative, destructive action.

No turning the other cheek, and no turning back please Khaldoon !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top