Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,382
Yes, I was trying to get that through to a conceited Chelsea fan. That what City are accused of, is far worse than overvalued sponsorships. He wouldn't have it though. I think they just like that better because they get to use that as an excuse to run through their City bingo phrases. "City don't have the fanbase to justify their sponsorships" etcWhat I find bizarre about the excessive and overly negative coverage which lacks balance is that if our detractors actually followed the logic of their arguments as the video explains its even more serous than they would have us believe which is why I don’t think the accusations are true or at least provable. Which is why I don’t think they really utter some of the words phrases etc for fear of a being sued and b showing how stupid the charges must be. You can hate city you can think we are dodgy etc but do you real think that 9 years of accounts are wrong along with a massive conspiracy between auditors Etihad Mancini the Sheik etc etc etc
Last edited: