PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

gordondaviesmoustache said:
This approach has allowed this poison around these charges to grow unabated.
Click to expand...

I agree, while understanding why they act this way, we need a leader to be visible and fight our corner with the scum media. A once a year address doesn't really cut it. Pep has done a fantastic job but I feel sorry for the fucker handling all those cunts on his own.
 
paulchapo said:
I agree, while understanding why they act this way, we need a leader to be visible and fight our corner with the scum media. A once a year address doesn't really cut it. Pep has done a fantastic job but I feel sorry for the fucker handling all those cunts on his own.
Click to expand...
Pep could take all those fuckers on with one hand tied behind his back and a hangover
 
LeonardoDaVnci said:
View attachment 111337

A personal message from HHSM​

Let me start by thanking my dear friend @LeonardoDaVnci for the use of his BMF account to speak with you today. I would urge all of you to read his excellent posts within this thread, and if you can find it your hearts, please press the Like buttons.

My dear friend @gordondaviesmoustache I would like to share with you a famous proverb used here in the Arab world...

"Ala al-baghi tadur al-dawair"

This means the wheel of injustice turns against the oppressor. It underlines the concept of karma or divine justice. It suggests that those who commit injustices will eventually face the consequences of their actions.

I give you a solemn promise, those slimy toads, the dippers, the rags, the arses and their little poodle who defame, besmirch and smear our beloved Manchester City will pay for their actions a thousand times over. Be strong Bluemooners, @gordondaviesmoustache be patient, I will never disappoint you.

PS For the Arse game I have arranged a free bar at MaryDs to say thank you for your eternal loyalty.

CTID
HHSM
Click to expand...
Free Bar you say God bless you HHSM, now where's my pass for upstairs :-)
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The two aren’t mutually exclusive and in my estimation he is unquestionably useless.

Firstly, he was picked after others were appointed and subsequently inexplicably resiled from taking the role. That is very telling imo, given the profile and responsibility attached to the job. Being offered a such a job then walking away is highly unusual. For it to happen more than once, truly exceptional. This demonstrates that he wasn’t objectively the ‘best’ candidate and also that he was likely prepared to operate in a way the others weren’t - but that doesn’t stop him being useless.

Secondly, he has spectacularly miscalculated with regards to these charges against City and has placed the PL in a wholly unnecessary and invidious position. This demonstrates extremely poor judgement and lack of vision, both loudly proclaiming his uselessness.

Thirdly is the wider way the financial rules are currently playing out within the most successful sporting brand in human history, on his watch. He is presiding over a farce in relation to financial restrictions within the most commercially successful sporting product on the planet. That is actually absurd and further underlines his uselessness.

Fourthly, I’ve seen and heard him talk. A conspicuously unimpressive and uncharismatic man. Not someone who I think is remotely suited to a role that is palpably considerably above his talents.

In short, he is a useless ****.
Click to expand...

But what will his reward be for being a useless ****?
 
paulchapo said:
I agree, while understanding why they act this way, we need a leader to be visible and fight our corner with the scum media. A once a year address doesn't really cut it. Pep has done a fantastic job but I feel sorry for the fucker handling all those cunts on his own.
Click to expand...
Yeah get Gary Cook back he’d be straight on the front foot with the cnuts in the media..
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The two aren’t mutually exclusive and in my estimation he is unquestionably useless.

Firstly, he was picked after others were appointed and subsequently inexplicably resiled from taking the role. That is very telling imo, given the profile and responsibility attached to the job. Being offered a such a job then walking away is highly unusual. For it to happen more than once, truly exceptional. This demonstrates that he wasn’t objectively the ‘best’ candidate and also that he was likely prepared to operate in a way the others weren’t - but that doesn’t stop him being useless.

Secondly, he has spectacularly miscalculated with regards to these charges against City and has placed the PL in a wholly unnecessary and invidious position. This demonstrates extremely poor judgement and lack of vision, both loudly proclaiming his uselessness.

Thirdly is the wider way the financial rules are currently playing out within the most successful sporting brand in human history, on his watch. He is presiding over a farce in relation to financial restrictions within the most commercially successful sporting product on the planet. That is actually absurd and further underlines his uselessness.

Fourthly, I’ve seen and heard him talk. A conspicuously unimpressive and uncharismatic man. Not someone who I think is remotely suited to a role that is palpably considerably above his talents.

In short, he is a useless ****.
Click to expand...

Brilliant and spot on. He's taken the best product in world football and ruined it. If it carries on in this way English clubs will be championship level once more in Europe. As for a regulator, if whoever is appointed does as good a job as the absolute fuckwits running the country football really is fucked.
 
mancboy said:
In football many people have made many millions from being useless cunts, Rashford im looking at you.
Click to expand...

I’m thinking of people who are placed in positions of power & come across so incompetent that they just think he’s a buffoon & yet they should be judged purely on the results & as if they are competent.

1711147497300.gif
 
bluenova said:
But the idea isn't to encourage losses - it's to accept that they may occur, but to try and minimise them.

It makes sense for it to be higher when the rules are introduced, as clubs will have contracts with players, outstanding transfer fees etc.

Increasing the amounts involved would suggest that losses are fine.

To put the £213m that Kieran Maguire mentions in context; while it's not enough to help any club compete with the top Premier League clubs, it's still a significant amount to lose. There are only twenty football clubs in the World with yearly revenues higher than that figure.
Click to expand...

You’re all wrong……

It was probably just in case the Rags had losses around this amount. There hasn’t been a single rule created that hasn’t started from maintaining them at the top so we should assume that was the reason for this also.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The two aren’t mutually exclusive and in my estimation he is unquestionably useless.

Firstly, he was picked after others were appointed and subsequently inexplicably resiled from taking the role. That is very telling imo, given the profile and responsibility attached to the job. Being offered a such a job then walking away is highly unusual. For it to happen more than once, truly exceptional. This demonstrates that he wasn’t objectively the ‘best’ candidate and also that he was likely prepared to operate in a way the others weren’t - but that doesn’t stop him being useless.

Secondly, he has spectacularly miscalculated with regards to these charges against City and has placed the PL in a wholly unnecessary and invidious position. This demonstrates extremely poor judgement and lack of vision, both loudly proclaiming his uselessness.

Thirdly is the wider way the financial rules are currently playing out within the most successful sporting brand in human history, on his watch. He is presiding over a farce in relation to financial restrictions within the most commercially successful sporting product on the planet. That is actually absurd and further underlines his uselessness.

Fourthly, I’ve seen and heard him talk. A conspicuously unimpressive and uncharismatic man. Not someone who I think is remotely suited to a role that is palpably considerably above his talents.

In short, he is a useless ****.
Click to expand...
Makes you wonder how he got so far up the corporate ladder! Simply being useless but outlasting everyone else? Nepotism? Willing to do the dirty?
Also, just an aside, didn’t one of the others originally accept the position, learnt more about the role and then backed out? Or am I misremembering?

It is my theory,that his uselessness, idiocy and lack of charisma is the reason they approved him. Incompetency is a very good cover.

We’ll see in a few years when he loses his job.I don’t think he’ll be unemployed long and wouldn’t be surprised to see him gain some sort of advisory role in UEFA or god forbid some sort of new league
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top