PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I'm Blue said:
View attachment 117158
Who’s angry?
Do you want some you twat? ; )
*disclaimer
I have no idea who he is.
Click to expand...
Cesspit! Thats slanderous or libel or acceptable language if you run the BBC!

@Ric get the cease and desist letters going.

Grumpy angry people is spot on tho -:)
 
halfcenturyup said:
I don't know, I don't care and I didn't even comment on that.

I merely tried to draw your attention to the fact that the concept of a percentage chance of less than zero doesn't exist, has never existed and will never exist in the real world in this or any other dimension. Unless, I suppose, you are talking quasi-probabilities or quantum mechanics, neither of which really apply to the professional performance of Adam Lewis unless I am very much mistaken.
Click to expand...
Fair enough, I will still stand on my point though that the chance the PL advanced without Lewis’ advice is so infintessimely small, Hawking wouldn’t have considered it possible.

burning blue soul said:
The mood music lately is a pro-City narrative, and I'll take that.
Click to expand...

Serious question as ive been away for a bit - what mood music is this? As is actual credible journalists? Or weirdos on social media?
 
mancity dan said:


Is this right @Prestwich_Blue ?
Click to expand...

I'm confident about my information that the PL want some sort of settlement.

@gordondaviesmoustache has talked about the use of the phrase "...will be resolved..." alluding to a settlement rather than going full speed ahead with a hearing based on a weak case.

Alberto Galassi's interview also suggests that the club feels it's on the verge of a successful outcome.

And I've always been confident and maintained these alleged breaches are very weak, and have either been rejected by CAS or considered not worth bothering with by UEFA.

It's also possible that the IC has come to the conclusion that these breaches aren't considered fraudulent and therefore outside the statutory 6- year limit under UK law.
 
I'm Blue said:
View attachment 117158
Who’s angry?
Do you want some you twat? ; )
*disclaimer
I have no idea who he is.
Click to expand...
This literally all stems from when he was trying to be ITK on Twitter, then people called him out on taking tolmie’s posts on here then around 5 or 10 mins later he’d have an inside scoop on Twitter.

It’s far, far easier to hoodwink our Twitter fanbase than it is the Bluemoon community. That’s the top and bottom of him leaving due to “anger and hate”. People on Twitter still think he’s got sources at the club, it’s absolutely bonkers.
 
I'm Blue said:
View attachment 117158
Who’s angry?
Do you want some you twat? ; )
*disclaimer
I have no idea who he is.
Click to expand...
The blokes a tosser and I hope you`re reading this. You know fuck all and all you do on a regular basis is nick other peoples posts and making out you are ITK.
As Ricky would say "my arse".
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
I'm confident about my information that the PL want some sort of settlement.

@gordondaviesmoustache has talked about the use of the phrase "...will be resolved..." alluding to a settlement rather than going full speed ahead with a hearing based on a weak case.

Alberto Galassi's interview also suggests that the club feels it's on the verge of a successful outcome.

And I've always been confident and maintained these alleged breaches are very weak, and have either been rejected by CAS or considered not worth bothering with by UEFA.

It's also possible that the IC has come to the conclusion that these breaches aren't considered fraudulent and therefore outside the statutory 6- year limit under UK law.
Click to expand...
I love it when you talk dirty Colin. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top