PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Iassel said:
Having spent a depressing amount of my life in board meetings, as I suspect is the same for you HCU, at best they’re getting a 5 minute rundown from Cliff for the CFG combined to make more time for something from the Waitrose finest collection.

I’d be shocked if the NED’s know anymore about the case than most people on here do as ultimately it’s not relevant for them.
Click to expand...
Erm, MCFC Limited (the company charged and that all the allegations relate to) only has NEDs - there are no execs. And almost of them have been there since 2008-2012.

So I think it’s safe to say they’d be very interested in updates on allegations of this nature especially as some are central to the allegations and all have big jobs off the MCFC board. Obviously some boards really do nothing at all but I really doubt this board has as little interest in this topic as you suggest. Really very unlikely
 
jonah62 said:
Walls don’t stay up when there’s scouse cunts around
Click to expand...

Iassel said:
Having spent a depressing amount of my life in board meetings, as I suspect is the same for you HCU, at best they’re getting a 5 minute rundown from Cliff for the CFG combined to make more time for something from the Waitrose finest collection.

I’d be shocked if the NED’s know anymore about the case than most people on here do as ultimately it’s not relevant for them.
Click to expand...
Playing ludo with your friends doesn't count as a board meeting
 
Last edited:
Prestwich_Blue said:
I'm confident about my information that the PL want some sort of settlement.

@gordondaviesmoustache has talked about the use of the phrase "...will be resolved..." alluding to a settlement rather than going full speed ahead with a hearing based on a weak case.

Alberto Galassi's interview also suggests that the club feels it's on the verge of a successful outcome.

And I've always been confident and maintained these alleged breaches are very weak, and have either been rejected by CAS or considered not worth bothering with by UEFA.

It's also possible that the IC has come to the conclusion that these breaches aren't considered fraudulent and therefore outside the statutory 6- year limit under UK law.
Click to expand...
Encouraging and thanks I will sleep a title sounder on your post.
if you’re right then I guess a major consideration is the stance of our guys on the intensity of the potential ‘pinch.’
We took a sharp one a few years ago and intamated we would never do so again!
Die in a ditch territory or pragmatic resolution……In these situations who really wins if one side is pounded into the dirt?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top