PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I'm expecting quick obvious responses to Simon Jordan's loud interjections. Embarrassing performance, no wonder they keep asking him back on, it makes they're job of belittling our club so much easier.
If you really need to see someone frothing at the mouth in response then why not apply yourself?
 
I have read the FAQ and every post on this thread and your Twitter offerings since you started going on Talksport.

I know you're not on there to defend City you're on there to self promote.

The reason I thought you might defend City is that I thought you were a City fan.

When it came to discuss City on that show today, Jordan understood what was required of him (to stick the boot in) and he had you on toast.

As I now know you're not on to defend City, I'll pass next time you announce on Twitter and Bluemoon that "I'm on Talksport" today.
fkn ell - who left the gate open?
 
I am not an apologist for Stefan but if you were expecting an independent expert to defend our club on Talk Sport you picked the wrong site, you need to stick to Blue Moon. Regards the charges obviously we are being accused of fraud that is why it's so serious and why ultimately we will win because to prove that will be very difficult
 
The reason I thought you might defend City is that I thought you were a City fan.

If Talksport wanted the view of a City fan then they’d ask a City fan to go on specifically for that reason.

Stefan is on there because he’s a football finance expert, not because he’s a City fan and it’s unfair of anyone to expect him to compromise his professional standards just because we want a cheerleader in the press.
 
I really don't get why Stefan is getting grief , what do you expect him to do ?
Bit bizarre, Jordan sounded a bit desperate to me in his attempt to say firstly he's not biased against City, (clearly has a poor memory) and secondly in his insinuations that the PL were the poor cousins when it came to appointing lawyers. I thought Steffan clearly put him right with facts on the second point. Jordan was just guessing and couldn't offer any facts to back his assertions.

Steffan also said he thought Goldbridge was making stuff up about his letter to make himself relevant and get more clicks. Which could easily be true, as that's his buiness.

The interesting bit was the settlement possibility discussion. I think Steffan said he thought City would like to settle as they are business people. And that the PL were possibly in too deep to not progress? The settlement possibility kind of goes against what Khaldoon stated.
 
If you don’t understand what talkshite is about then people should not listen.
They like to stoke controversy and play to the masses. Like it or not, there are far more fans of other clubs who would love to see city relegated.
City fans are not their target audience.
Whilst Jordan and white are rubbing their hands whilst loading up the gun. Stefan is showing some balance, purely by stating fact.
Fact is something that doesn’t increase listeners to the show and is largely why talkshite employ Jordan, white, goldridge etc
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top