Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
9f94957044fdb0d1d5a0a202ef481b8c.jpg
Why do these people think that we need confirmation or credit from them? It doesn't work like that. We WANT you to act like mards...it means we're hurting you MORE! This means MORE!
 
When covid hit and those temporary hospitals popped up, I think something similar has to happen for mental health hospitals when most of these charges get dropped.
 
Unfortunately, we've removed your comment because it broke the house rules
This is the text you wrote:
Why do the BBC allow people to accuse City of cheating, when it clearly breaks the house rules that posts should not be defamatory?
Your comment was considered to have broken the following House Rule:
"We reserve the right to fail comments which...
Are considered to be off-topic for the discussion or are derailing the discussion onto a different topic."
I appealed against the removal of the above post and got this reply:

Thank you for contacting the BBC.
In this instance, it appears your comment was removed in error so we have reinstated it.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention and please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.


One would hope that they would investigate why it was removed in the first place, but you know it will just be glossed over.
 
I appealed against the removal of the above post and got this reply:

Thank you for contacting the BBC.
In this instance, it appears your comment was removed in error so we have reinstated it.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention and please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.


One would hope that they would investigate why it was removed in the first place, but you know it will just be glossed over.
Absolutely. I wonder if there is a freedom of information act or similar that would allow someone to request a list of all the comments from blues that have been removed and the rationale from the BBC. I suspect there will be thousands more comments removed 'incorrectly'.
 


Fucking idiot. ‘Impossible for promoted teams to stay up’. Name another league where a promoted team (Forest) can spend over £200 million. The premier league is just way more competitive now rather than 10 years ago. Promoted teams need to be smart And invest well. Look at Burnley they spent a lot of money this season you couldn’t name a single signing that’s done well. That isn’t the leagues fault.
 
Why do these people think that we need confirmation or credit from them? It doesn't work like that. We WANT you to act like mards...it means we're hurting you MORE! This means MORE!
Exactly, we all cried ourselves to sleep last night as bitter rival fans and journalists didn’t pat us on the back and congratulate us
 


Fucking idiot. ‘Impossible for promoted teams to stay up’. Name another league where a promoted team (Forest) can spend over £200 million. The premier league is just way more competitive now rather than 10 years ago. Promoted teams need to be smart And invest well. Look at Burnley they spent a lot of money this season you couldn’t name a single signing that’s done well. That isn’t the leagues fault.

brighton disprove his theory
 
We scored the most goals this season in the Prem (97) and can't get a single goal nominated for the Goal of the Season on MOTD, yet the rags (57) get three nominations out of nine.

tu3xhUI.gif
I'll settle for the finishing 1st in the league trophy thanks ;)
Let's be honest we're not short of awards the last few years - so despite the bile and hatred we're still doing things right :D
 
The purpose of the charges is to tarnish our achievements. To cast a cloud over them.

The press are the street dealer to the end user, but the producer and source of this fishing expedition are the clubs who coerced the PL into bringing these preposterous charges.
Its so obviously orchestrated. I'm taking it all as the biggest compliment the twats can lay on us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top