PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

mancboy said:
Thats two out of the four in the shit for dodgy dealings, what was it khaldoon said dont use city to try and deflect from your poor decisions, interesting times ahead
Click to expand...
And the Sheik's "mate" scruffy Jim in at the swamp
 
I’ve said it from the very start.

“People in glass houses…..”

Ask yourselves, I know it’s ’allegedly’ 115 charges (FFS!) but how long has this been going on for??
Both Everton &Forest were tried and found guilty in like 4 minutes! Surely with ‘allegedly’ 115 charges (FFS!!) it should be a slam dunk for the totally inept and corrupt FA??
My opinion FWIW, has remained the same since the witch-hunt began, is that WE have said “enough is enough”... stop this shit right now and we’re coming after YOU and all your shite slinging fcuk buddies who we will silence!
After we have been totally exonerated, which I’m supremely confident we will be, we should sue all the fcukers for every dirty penny they’ve got, for pursuing this public and premeditated assault on our beautiful clubs good name!




And If the worst comes to the worst, at least we will have another record, the only club to beat Barrow in its last league fixture of the season, before winning the FA Cup and Chumps League trophies the following weekends ;-))


CTID and so fcuking proud to be so!!!!
 
Last edited:
bigA said:
It's dirty oil money if the oil comes from the gulf states such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia etc. It's not dirty oil money if it comes from the white oil barons from the redneck state of Texas in the good ol' US of A
Click to expand...
And all the tossers that say dirty oil money use it to heat their houses, power their cars, fuel the energy that makes their food...I could go on, but I won't. The reason the money is dirty in the eyes of some people is because its not being spent on their football club.
 
Bez said:
And all the tossers that say dirty oil money use it to heat their houses, power their cars, fuel the energy that makes their food...I could go on, but I won't. The reason the money is dirty in the eyes of some people is because its not being spent on their football club.
Click to expand...
very true wasnt so dirty when the fake sheikh was all over the rags was it
 
mancboy said:
So im curious will the pl now be asking the dippers sponsors to open up their books based on a media article or is that something exclusively reserved for us
Click to expand...
They won't do a thing to Liverpool. Wouldn't surprise me that the dippers, rags and Tarquins loving media will try to fabricate rumours that ADUG, Etihad, Sheik Mansour have got links to Al Qaeda if we get found innocent of the 115 charges.
 
Centurions said:
Unconscious bias perhaps, they all want to impress the top dog so believe everything the boss says without trying to think for themselves.

Belief perseverance and the backfire effect is in plain sight every single day.
Click to expand...
Unconscious…??? Its anything but unconscious unless i bump into the twat ;)
 
JPAMCR said:
fucking rags and their tax bill, scousers and their terrorist money, arsenals Rwanda hook -up and spurs insider dealing and we’re the ones on the hook. Mental.
Click to expand...
Lets see the pl ask the rwandan government open up their books and see if this was fair market value, has tourism to rwanada increased considerably since the sponsors i very much doubt it
 
bigA said:
They won't do a thing to Liverpool. Wouldn't surprise me that the dippers, rags and Tarquins loving media will try to fabricate rumours that ADUG, Etihad, Sheik Mansour have got links to Al Qaeda if we get found innocent of the 115 charges.
Click to expand...
i really hope they do, they may be abhorrent but they are staying 'just' on the right side of a huge libel case at the mo, they go down that route and they are going out of business
 
“You’re shiite and you know you are…..” next time we play the twats.
mancity2012_eamo said:
If Standard Chartered sponsored City it would have our name all over the headline. Subtle differences like this make less of an impact on those that don’t go beyond that first glance.whe
Click to expand...

mancity2012_eamo said:
If Standard Chartered sponsored City it would have our name all over the headline. Subtle differences like this make less of an impact on those that don’t go beyond that first glance.
Click to expand...
 
Bluekiwi said:
When articles about City appeared on the MSN web site here in NZ some clown always commented "115". After about the fifth occasion I replied, "Do you actually know what the charges are?" Hasn't commented since!
Click to expand...
I wouldn't expect one either.
I go through twitter now and then as you do. There's always faceless twitter accounts, I call them bots. When I click on their page it is saturated full of replies about Man City and nothing else.
I do my best in calling it all out and reporting but twitter or anyone else for that matter doesn't want to know, so I just give it back as best as I can.
I go with the view that our club are fighting in house legally, I'll fight (not physically haha) against all the keyboard worriers everywhere else tarnishing our clubs name online or anywhere.
 
mancboy said:
Lets see the pl ask the rwandan government open up their books and see if this was fair market value, has tourism to rwanada increased considerably since the sponsors i very much doubt it
Click to expand...

It must be nice there to make a film about Hotel Rwanda….
 
Ballosteve said:
We all know why it's not getting the headlines it deserve is the press and media in general are shit scared of the murderoool PR machine...
Click to expand...

Wrote this the other day in the media thread, will post it here with some things added as it's relevant to this.

UK sports media is stuffed, full to the brim with utd and liverpool fanzine writers. Not that most of them are from Manchester and liverpool, but they chose them as their team when they were winning stuff.

And now it's City winning, they can't stand it. Not one of these fanzine writers actually cares about ffp, the charges, sportswashing or human rights, etc. They're only crying as they aren't winning anymore. Which is why we get so much shit and our achievments are over looked.

Also why when their own skeletons are out of the closet it's largely ignored or put right down the bottom of the website page.

Not helped by City's media department being a bunch of pussies who try and be as accommodating as possible to them.
 
bigA said:
They won't do a thing to Liverpool. Wouldn't surprise me that the dippers, rags and Tarquins loving media will try to fabricate rumours that ADUG, Etihad, Sheik Mansour have got links to Al Qaeda if we get found innocent of the 115 charges.
Click to expand...

FYI a massive amount of the human rights abuses that the UAE is accused of, are towards Islamic extremists and those accused of aiding or abetting them.

Their policy is very much a "do not pass go, we don't give a shit about your rights if you're a terrorist" type policy and its something that is often ignored by people criticising the regime there.

Terrorism in the Mid East for many of the nations attempting to open themselves up to the world is a massive issue which they come down on extremely harshly, often without the full judicial process that you would get here. It's a local, national and international embarrassment to some of these countries to be linked with it and the penalties are as harsh as they get.

Terrorist attacks are rare to non-existent there and they're constantly on the look out for financing of terrorism from within their borders and deal with these in the same heavy handed way. It's also one of the reasons why the UAE et al broke off diplomatic ties with Qatar a while back after they were found to be funding Islamic terrorism.

They're actually proper cunts about it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top