My own view is that it is likely to be a huge points penalty introduced during next season or the 25/26 season. Probably enough to relegate us to the Championship but definitely sufficient to knock us out of Europe. I just don't think they will attempt to relegate us into oblivion.
Haven't been on here for some time, where has this sort of views come from ?
I just don't believe City and our sponsors have been committed full scale fraud for over a decade. What's changed ?
AnneFrank?
She's currently showing Dion Dublin around her atticAnne
Is it up some stairs?She's currently showing Dion Dublin around her attic
Was going to post something similar, cheers stopped me talking gibberish again :).Our top notch, smart arse lawyers will have absorbed Lawtons hit piece as conclusive evidence as to why we didn't cooperate. It's in THEIR handbook clubs should act in good faith to each other and it's not the first time Woolwich FC have been involved.
Never felt more confident even though the media tossers in particular the journalists are irritating.
The level of paranoia.Haven't been on here for some time, where has this sort of views come from ?
I just don't believe City and our sponsors have been committed full scale fraud for over a decade. What's changed ?
He's great in the box.More mobility than the current midfield
Not a prayer that's happeningMy own view is that it is likely to be a huge points penalty introduced during next season or the 25/26 season. Probably enough to relegate us to the Championship but definitely sufficient to knock us out of Europe. I just don't think they will attempt to relegate us into oblivion.
im not paranoid they definitely are out to get us ;)The level of paranoia.
Are you a scruffy Jim Disciple?I think people need to read and reflect rather than react. The point I made is in relation to a guilty verdict which is delivered and the punishment that is likely to result. I have as any sensible person should not reached a conclusion on the likely outcome. I hope that the Clubs blanket refusal to accept the validity of these charges and to protest innocence will result in a satisfactory outcome.
Perhaps they feel that their own appointed tribunal is the same as their biased internal Rule breaking designed for City so leaks are normal?Was going to post something similar, cheers stopped me talking gibberish again :).
The evidence is in and being appraised, but the terminology and understanding of that is also being appraised, Good Faith being as vital as non cooperation. Lawton and Woolwich did not just score an own goal, they kicked the goalie in the head and got sent off.
Was quite amusing when Woolwich plastic Piers Morgan did a show with that smug twat Lawton last year expecting his fellow Arsenal mate and former Vice Chairman Dein to twist the knife only for him to suggest their,s no smoking gun.Was going to post something similar, cheers stopped me talking gibberish again :).
The evidence is in and being appraised, but the terminology and understanding of that is also being appraised, Good Faith being as vital as non cooperation. Lawton and Woolwich did not just score an own goal, they kicked the goalie in the head and got sent off.
I'm like youHaven't been on here for some time, where has this sort of views come from ?
I just don't believe City and our sponsors have been committed full scale fraud for over a decade. What's changed ?
re Non-coperationOur top notch, smart arse lawyers will have absorbed Lawtons hit piece as conclusive evidence as to why we didn't cooperate. It's in THEIR handbook clubs should act in good faith to each other and it's not the first time Woolwich FC have been involved.
Never felt more confident even though the media tossers in particular the journalists are irritating.
Was quite amusing when Woolwich plastic Piers Morgan did a show with that smug twat Lawton last year expecting his fellow Arsenal mate and former Vice Chairman Dein to twist the knife only for him to suggest their,s no smoking gun.
Maybe he is more informed than most as co founder of the Premier League and how the red tops rigged the rules in self interest.
re Non-coperation
First and foremost, the contract between the PL and member clubs states ALL parties including the PL will act in upmost good faith at ALL times. This means there is a mutual obligation on the PL to co-operate with the clubs. Its not a one way obligation for each club to co-operate unconditionally with the PL. So if the PL send a "request" demanding to see absolutely anything and everything about a club's operations then the club has the right to ask the PL why.
If the PL does not answer why then they are not acting in good faith and are not co-operating.
Well if there isn't then that shows just how dodgy the PL rule makers areAre you sure? I haven't seen a rule that the PL has to act in good faith with the clubs, only that the clubs and its officials have to act in good faith with the PL and other clubs (rule B5) ....
There may be one, I just don't remember seeing it.
Are you sure? I haven't seen a rule that the PL has to act in good faith with the clubs, only that the clubs and its officials have to act in good faith with the PL and other clubs (rule B5) ....
There may be one, I just don't remember seeing it.
Was quite amusing when Woolwich plastic Piers Morgan did a show with that smug twat Lawton last year expecting his fellow Arsenal mate and former Vice Chairman Dein to twist the knife only for him to suggest their,s no smoking gun.
Maybe he is more informed than most as co founder of the Premier League and how the red tops rigged the rules in self interest.