S
S
Sale Moor Blue
Guest
I'm notSo why do keep doing that then?
It's being so cheerful that keeps you going.
I'm notSo why do keep doing that then?
Chill fellas.So why do keep doing that then?
I'm not
It's being so cheerful that keeps you going.
It's not old news tho is it? It is a hot topical political potato that the last Government effectively did nothing about and this Government will be questioned on.Withdrawing from the refugee is a stupid suggestion, which is what you seemed to be proposing. People in boats is old news, the country has moved on.
WRONGWithdrawing from the refugee is a stupid suggestion, which is what you seemed to be proposing. People in boats is old news, the country has moved on.
It's not old news tho is it? It is a hot topical political potato that the last Government effectively did nothing about and this Government will be questioned on.
WRONG
OK, I happen to dissagree, we shall see.They exaggerated the issue and then made the asylum system grind to a halt in order to get credit for solving a problem they created.
It's old news. The country decided it wasn't a big issue on July 4th.
Now then Ms Kuenssberg...heading into week 3 of a Labour Govt and I am not a millionaire - STARMER OUT
Exactly how have we been disrespectful to Rwanda?Let's face it none of the main parties have a clue about it and more to the point I don't think they care.
The Rwanda scheme was doomed to fail and it has but Labour should not have got rid of it so quick and they have been very disrespectful to Rwanda.
Successive goverments have promised us to sort it out and never have. It's the tax payers who suffer as ever.
I think Rwanda will get over being disrespected while they count their hundreds of millions of pounds given to them by the British taxpayer.Let's face it none of the main parties have a clue about it and more to the point I don't think they care.
The Rwanda scheme was doomed to fail and it has but Labour should not have got rid of it so quick and they have been very disrespectful to Rwanda.
Successive goverments have promised us to sort it out and never have. It's the tax payers who suffer as ever.
good
good
Rawanda are disrespectful motherfuckers!Disrespectful to Rwanda? Lol
They get millions of quid for doing nothing!
I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.Aside from the salmonella issue, which wasn't acceptable, I never understood what was wrong with this accommodation. I spent quite some time in similar accommodation offshore in my early career. It was fine then and it remains fine for the thousands of British workers who continue to use such facilities in the Oil and Gas industry in UK waters and further afield.
So the question is why do you think it's not good enough for asylum seekers?
I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.
If that is the case, then reducing costs and increasing the efficiencies of this operation should be relatively straight forward?I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.