PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

ancoats said:
I think that is why the board members of the Premier League need to change or challenge the head and its voting system, Are clubs getting a fair deal when United control the whole system, Far too many of the smaller clubs fear being cut off and are under pressure to back United in the voting system,

They are lied to by United and Sky about City and other clubs with wealthy backers who don't care about them and will stop the parachute payments system and go to the Super League,

Mark My Words, the SUPER LEAGUE was a United idea and the so-called elite way of stopping City, It's Funny how Skysports was leading the witch hunt and getting fans to back them and saying football is not for sale.

1992 United, Sky, did the dirty on the same clubs and football league and FA by selling clubs down the river, It was all fake and the only Club making profits was United because they were the only club being shown everyweek.

I think Manchester City are Now Big Enough to challenge them and start a revolution to upset the apple cart and put united faces out of joint, This New PSR and United Fudging the books should be taken to all the other clubs and say look they don't care about you and the rules
Click to expand...
Can you imagine the fury if Forest had been relegated?
 
I'm Blue said:
From the BBC explaining our 115 charges.
‘5x Failure to comply with Uefa's rules including Financial Fair Play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18.’
So either they’re wrong or I’m misunderstanding it.
Click to expand...
The biggest oddity is that we were cleared of breaking the rules in 1913-14. What is that charge about?
 
ancoats said:
I think that is why the board members of the Premier League need to change or challenge the head and its voting system, Are clubs getting a fair deal when United control the whole system, Far too many of the smaller clubs fear being cut off and are under pressure to back United in the voting system,

They are lied to by United and Sky about City and other clubs with wealthy backers who don't care about them and will stop the parachute payments system and go to the Super League,

Mark My Words, the SUPER LEAGUE was a United idea and the so-called elite way of stopping City, It's Funny how Skysports was leading the witch hunt and getting fans to back them and saying football is not for sale.

1992 United, Sky, did the dirty on the same clubs and football league and FA by selling clubs down the river, It was all fake and the only Club making profits was United because they were the only club being shown everyweek.

I think Manchester City are Now Big Enough to challenge them and start a revolution to upset the apple cart and put united faces out of joint, This New PSR and United Fudging the books should be taken to all the other clubs and say look they don't care about you and the rules
Click to expand...
The tide is slowly turning with stories like this, unfortunately the scum and it's little cartel have the majority voting numbers.
For now at least.
There's a reason certain clubs don't an independent regulator, it's cos they'll lose their power.
It's time clubs banded together and removed that power.
 
Just watched a Newcastle fan on YouTube who was fuming about this £40m.
He did make me chuckle with this little gem...
"Richard Masters and one of his bastards needs to come out and explain this"
He was also hoping the MSM would be shouting this from the rooftops.
Yeah good luck with that one.
 
remember arthur mann said:
Makes you think there's a few back handers going to the lower clubs.
Click to expand...

Defo
We all know the loan system is used and players go to clubs that need to play against their rivals

But this sinks and everybody else should be up in arms and wanting answers to why PSR has allowed United to use COVID to fudge £40million and then the shares sale to Jim of £35 million, Enough of this shit getting pushed under the carpet, Even in that interview on talksport Jim was trying to jump in on Stefan to shut him up
 
silva_is_gold said:
www.facebook.com

850K views · 3.5K reactions | Finance expert reveals Man United should've FAILED PSR but were given huge advantage over other sides! | talkSPORT

Finance expert reveals Man United should've FAILED PSR but were given huge advantage over other sides!
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
Definitely warrabout yernited!!!
Click to expand...

ancoats said:
Defo
We all know the loan system is used and players go to clubs that need to play against their rivals

But this sinks and everybody else should be up in arms and wanting answers to why PSR has allowed United to use COVID to fudge £40million and then the shares sale to Jim of £35 million, Enough of this shit getting pushed under the carpet, Even in that interview on talksport Jim was trying to jump in on Stefan to shut him up
Click to expand...
As a matter of interest, how much allowance did City get for Covid?
 
silva_is_gold said:
Apparently one million each for the other clubs, so united got more than the rest of the other clubs combined! wtf!
Click to expand...

Also, claiming back £35million of the shares sold to JIM instead of the Glazers paying it ???

We all know United Fudge the Books and have been doing so for years, that's why they create a smoke screen in the media and claim City are cheats, The Biggest Cheaters point the finger at somebody else to deflect what really going on at their club
 
ancoats said:
Also, claiming back £35million of the shares sold to JIM instead of the Glazers paying it ???

We all know United Fudge the Books and have been doing so for years, that's why they create a smoke screen in the media and claim City are cheats, The Biggest Cheaters point the finger at somebody else to deflect what really going on at their club
Click to expand...
That last paragraph is very very true mate!
 
ancoats said:
I think Stefan said all clubs got around £1million in allowances, Everton's Punishment Statement involved them pleading to the Premier League for more allowances because of Covid, But they turned Everton's plea down ?
Click to expand...

United was the only club to (conveniently) claim substantial losses in 22/23 for COVID. Some other clubs did, but they were small, around 1 million each, iirc. UEFA didn't fall for it, but it seems the PL did. What a surprise.

United told Maguire the 22/23 losses included an amount for bad debts on sponsorship, which Everton tried to claim for following the Russia sanctions, but the PL disallowed them (Russia/COVID are two different things, after all). They also said the losses included the impact of TV rebates from UEFA/PL, but everyone else accounted for those in 21/22 apparently. Does smell a bit bullshitty, though.

The Glazer/Ratcliffe legal costs shouldn't really have been included in the accounts (it seems to me), but if they are I think they can be legitimately excluded as non-sporting expenses. Not sure it's in the rules, but makes sense. Common sense doesn't come into the equation with City, though.
 
halfcenturyup said:
United was the only club to (conveniently) claim substantial losses in 22/23 for COVID. Some other clubs did, but they were small, around 1 million each, iirc. UEFA didn't fall for it, but it seems the PL did. What a surprise.

United told Maguire the 22/23 losses included an amount for bad debts on sponsorship, which Everton tried to claim for following the Russia sanctions, but the PL disallowed them (Russia/COVID are two different things, after all). They also said the losses included the impact of TV rebates from UEFA/PL, but everyone else accounted for those in 21/22 apparently. Does smell a bit bullshitty, though.

The Glazer/Ratcliffe legal costs shouldn't really have been included in the accounts (it seems to me), but if they are I think they can be legitimately excluded as non-sporting expenses. Not sure it's in the rules, but makes sense. Common sense doesn't come into the equation with City, though.
Click to expand...
City’s defence at UEFA and CAS was paid for by CFG. I don’t know whether the club accounted for that, but I would be wary of pointing fingers at others re legal costs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top