You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Certainly not Masters. Everything I've seen of him suggests his fleet-footed interview skills are non-existent.Went well for who, City or the PL?
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Cheers palThis was an appeal about the reporting of the case that City brought about the legality of the PL's right to ask for commercially sensitive documents, which they lost. The appeal by City to restrict reporting was supported by the PL however, the judge decided that reporting of the initial case should be allowed So, no the PL didn't win and Pannick wasn't involved at that stage
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
"City are still alive here.I would hope he gets cross examined by Pannick before Paul Harris delivers the knockout blow.
Pannick...Harrissssssss.
I swear you'll never see anything like this ever again. Two cross-examinations in injury time to snatch the verdict away from the Premier League. Stupendous!"
So, next chair of the Post Office then.Certainly not Masters. Everything I've seen of him suggests his fleet-footed interview skills are non-existent.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Just needed a middle finger to make it complete.View attachment 131707
Shitehousery of the highest order
Bet they paid a fortune for that :)View attachment 131707
Shitehousery of the highest order
Not sure I want to see Harris taking his shirt off and cavorting round the room, swinging it above his head. The pile on from Pannick, Soriano and Khoolhand defies description."City are still alive here.
Pannick...Harrissssssss.
I swear you'll never see anything like this ever again. Two cross-examinations in injury time to snatch the verdict away from the Premier League. Stupendous!"
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Not sure I want to see Harris taking his shirt off and cavorting round the room, swinging it above his head. The pile on from Pannick, Soriano and Khoolhand defies description.
Abdul Razak stood there not knowing whether to buzz or not.
Yep read "failure to comply with UEFA's rules including FF'P" as reported by the BBC, a little ambiguous but written by Roan so no surprise there.We're not being charged with failing FFP but there's a PL rule that teams playing in UEFA competitions have to provide accurate accounts to the PL (as they do the licensing).
I’ve rather it wasn’t that close PB, more a Watford FA cup final for sake of my nerves"City are still alive here.
Pannick...Harrissssssss.
I swear you'll never see anything like this ever again. Two cross-examinations in injury time to snatch the verdict away from the Premier League. Stupendous!"
55yr old teenager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2017
- Messages
- 2,160
Sorry to sound thick but I am not getting it?? Can you please explain it to me please?View attachment 131707
Shitehousery of the highest order
Just about to ask the sameSorry to sound thick but I am not getting it?? Can you please explain it to me please?
55yr old teenager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2017
- Messages
- 2,160
Not just me then!! LolJust about to ask the same
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 20,474
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Just about to ask the same
Esitsalat are meant to be involved with Etihad Airways and our sponsorship money I think ;) or I'm as confused as you lol
Clearly I won’t be sharing my sauceSource.
Blue Maverick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 25,133
Yep that’s exactly it.Esitsalat are meant to be involved with Etihad Airways and our sponsorship money I think ;) or I'm as confused as you lol
Small detail but Pannick was there for that too. Has advised the club for a long timeThis was an appeal about the reporting of the case that City brought about the legality of the PL's right to ask for commercially sensitive documents, which they lost. The appeal by City to restrict reporting was supported by the PL however, the judge decided that reporting of the initial case should be allowed So, no the PL didn't win and Pannick wasn't involved at that stage
But for whom did Master’s cross-ex go? For him or City?Clearly I won’t be sharing my sauce
City cross examined him as the PLs witness. Went well for City I heard.But for whom did Master’s cross-ex go? For him or City?