PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

wattle said:
Absolutely fucking exhausted with this! Can’t get up for any games, wasn’t arsed at the game on Wednesday and given my ticket up for today. I think they’ve finally beaten me. Someone (rag) was doing the usual ‘cheat’ chat last night and I couldn’t be arsed defending us. I’ve done it a thousand times and it’s just boring/monotonous now, especially as the fuckwhits won’t listen to any rational explanation/argument. Probably doesn’t help being autistic, but I’m totally burnt out with it. Just want it over with whatever the outcome.
Click to expand...

Mate don't let them beat you.

Ignore them all.

Don't listen or read anything from the press/media or other fans.

Honestly I only listen to City based things nowadays I couldn't give a fuck what howson or football365 want to say.

We are City the greatest club in the world let that sink in. That's why the red cartel don't like us.

Nothing is going to take away the Aguerooooooooo, Gundogan, Rodri moments nothing.

Chin up blue
 
Joe Donachie said:
I don’t bother with the guy, but when I seen a whole video about are 115 charges I just had to watch what he had to say lol,

It really does go over there heads, there very bitter the very same thing they have labelled us for years lol
Click to expand...
Any reason you didn’t describe him as a fat ****?
 
Joe Donachie said:
Has anyone seen the Stephen howson video that he did yesterday about if we get off with these charges??
Click to expand...
That fat **** obviously overlooks the £75 million bale out disguised as "allowances" to stop his pathetic 'Nited failing PSR rules.

He'll probably burst into tears like the soft fucker he is. Another muppet from the swamp like Andy Tate and Mark Goldbridge. Care in the community is definitely not working with those 3 tossers.
 
Stoned Rose said:
This non cooperation element baffles me.

If we have genuinely not provided such and such a document, or spreadsheet or witness statement, how would they be able to prove the alleged breach that relates to?
Remember the emphasis is on them to prove not us to disprove.

I get that an adverse inference could be drawn but that doesn’t necessarily amount to proof.

Also, would there be some “cut off point” for not cooperating on whatever issue? So for eg the PL say we need such and such a document by 1st May and we don’t provide it, but provide it a week later, would that still be non cooperation even though we have factually provided the document?

Would there be any criteria where not providing something is actually ok?
Click to expand...
I agree. The PL will have been on a fishing expedition and our lawyers will have advised City what they should and should not provide. That does not mean we did not cooperate. The media are assuming what happened at UEFA will happen again. I remember seeing a report from the PL that they were satisfied with City's level of cooperation early on in their investigation. I think the PL have thrown the kitchen sink at City in the hope that the IC can find something to criticise us with. Desperate stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top