PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Because he's a compulsive liar that has the ear of some large media companies ?

Than we move on to the state of these large media companies. Why would I listen to a company that employs someone who behaves like him.

OK I know what you mean but the media/press arent aimed at 'normal sensible people'. It's aimed at the knobheads with very little intelligence and a blind belief that their clubs are the best in the world.

I can do think of any other walk of life where spitting at anyone gets away with it. I suppose it could be said he wasn't working for sky at the time but . ...
 
They’ve been superseded 33 times in the last 34 years so that is some chronic long term mental illness right there.
It really is.
They grudgingly accept Manchester United, but we remember well the 'trophy-posturing' between the two.
They cannot accept a club they perceive as smaller, without the history, suddenly taking over them. It MUST be fake. It MUST be cheating. They MUST be punished.

Having said that, I asked a Liverpool supporting friend to take a look at RAWK. He was absolutely shocked and said that he will never look at it again, describing it as utterly horrible.
 
Spitty ….I’ve said it so many times that cnut should never be working on tv after that spitting incident.
Him spitting is a matter of fact.
City having the highest viewing figures in the USA is a fact.
His needle…well you can guess where that should go.

Success used to be the rod by which clubs are measured. Apparently it’s popularity now. Funny that isn’t it?

I can’t wait for his smacked arse face when City win yet again….along with all the other history clubs.

Talking of history do you know how many years it was since footy began before United amassed more top flight points than City? Have a guess before you scroll down for the answer…..























97 (1985)
 
Last edited:
I wonder if anyone ever called him out publicly for spitting in that child's face ? It seems to have been swept under the carpet.


I personally wouldn't have any issue reminding him about it, if I ever bumped into him, just to see his face. But luckily I don't move in the same circles as him.
 
I wonder if anyone ever called him out publicly for spitting in that child's face ? It seems to have been swept under the carpet.


I personally wouldn't have any issue reminding him about it, if I ever bumped into him, just to see his face. But luckily I don't move in the same circles as him.

To be honest if ever I saw him it's the first thing I would say to him
 
Carragher falls into the trap of thinking that Sky’s viewing figures are the be all and end all. I’m sure United and Liverpool do get the highest figures in this country, but the UK is an increasingly small market in a global economy. Overseas TV rights are now bigger than in the UK and the balance is only going one way. I think Carragher would be surprised at some of the viewing figures in other countries, he won’t do his research though, as it wouldn’t suit his narrative.
 
To be honest if ever I saw him it's the first thing I would say to him
Certainly needs adding to Wikipedia. An example they say !!

Carragher was awarded the Freedom of the Borough of Sefton for his local charity work and "the exceptional example he sets to the youth of today" .

1000011316.jpg

The country is fooked.
 
I wonder if anyone ever called him out publicly for spitting in that child's face ? It seems to have been swept under the carpet.


I personally wouldn't have any issue reminding him about it, if I ever bumped into him, just to see his face. But luckily I don't move in the same circles as him.
Wouldn't want to be within spitting distance of the ****.
 
He and his rat faced friend still seem unable to grasp the basic economic principle that a team that won the treble in a season (in the richest league in the world) and added the supercup and club world Cup would maximise their sponsorship income (winners bonuses), maximise their TV income (more games on the box than anybody else so more dosh) and max their trophy winners income all in the same year.
Who does he think should have earned more than City that year? Scousepool for winning the Carabou Cup because they have more fans in Malaysia? Do fuck off Jamie you thick scouse ****. They live in the fantasy land that thinks clubs earn big money from shirt sales. They don't.

This.

Is a sponsor only advertising to the club's own fans? No.

Do sponsors want their clubs to be in the Europa League (or worse!)? No, less people watch them.

Do sponsors want their clubs knocked out in the early stages of the CL? No, because it reduces publicity.

Do sponsors want viewers to see their club lifting trophies and being linked with success? Yes, more viewers for the biggest games and success attracts.

Which team has been practically guaranteed CL qualification, and reaching the latter stages of the tournament, for about the last 8 years. Us.

Which other teams don't and therefore don't give their sponsors the same level of exposure. Every other f#cker, but especially united, Chelsea, Spurs etc.

We should be getting bigger sponsorship deals than any other club now, simple.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if anyone ever called him out publicly for spitting in that child's face ? It seems to have been swept under the carpet.


I personally wouldn't have any issue reminding him about it, if I ever bumped into him, just to see his face. But luckily I don't move in the same circles as him.
This is how you know all these podcasts, all this overlap crap is carefully stage managed and edited to favour these two idiots and certain teams, most city fans could destroy these 2 and their woefully limited arguments in no time at all but quite simply arent allowed too.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top