Don't think that was an argument.Tolmie has hardly put a foot wrong with his information on the CAS and now the PL investigations. He is a very reliable source.
To post that now must have some significance. But what?Don't think that was an argument.
Simply that his post suggesting nothing.
He is 100% right, btw. It Will be one for the ages. Whichever way it goes. But beyond that doesn't hint at absolutely anything, including 'knowledge' of how it might be going.
Whatever you want it to be.To post that now must have some significance. But what?
Is this a good thing?Thank you. I have been told in recent days even the owner has gone in to bat!
Is this a good thing?
My thoughts.Is this a good thing?
My thoughts.
It don't sound to good when the gaffer has to get involved
Is this a good thing?
Didn't know that.He was involved at CAS as well. Perfectly normal.
We'd have had to say who our witnesses were going to be before the 'trial' started to make sure everyone was going to be available if needed.Didn't know that.
With all these top lawyers involved it just made me wonder why
And what information did he share with this message?
To post that now must have some significance. But what?
#75368 on page 7537Can somebody repost the Tolmie tweet about Sheikh Mansour giving evidence at the hearing. Thanks.
With you calling him a pudding I assume you mean a Spotted Dick (Head) ?Given the participation of HRH in this sham hearing, Masters and his cabal would basically have to say the Sheikh is a liar and acted fraudulently to find against us.
Good look with that, you incompetent pudding.
Or perhaps a fool?With you calling him a pudding I assume you mean a Spotted Dick ?
Their case is about to crumble!With you calling him a pudding I assume you mean a Spotted Dick ?
..., on the hill.Or perhaps a fool?
Bah rhubarb !!Their case is about to crumble!